MSFN Forum: New ultra-fast processor unveiled

Jump to content






Icon Latest News Comments


Icon MSFN Statistics

  • Total Posts 804258
  • Total Members 102877
  • Newest Member GlopGlop31 
  • Online At Once Record 17869
  • Online Now: 3003



    Icon Recommended Sites

    AskVG.com Bink Filehorse FreewareFiles IT Magazine lunarsoft Where unprofessional journalism looks better OSNN TechLog The Windows Club WinBeta

New ultra-fast processor unveiled -----

Posted on Dec 28 2010 09:01 AM by xper  in Hardware | Viewed 4474 Times

Scientists have created an ultra-fast 1,000 core computer processor which could speed up machines and make them greener. Originally, computers were developed with only one core processor, the part of a computer's central processing unit (CPU) which reads and executes instructions.

Nowadays processors with two, four or even 16 cores are commonplace. However, Dr Wim Vanderbauwhede, of the University of Glasgow, and colleagues at the University of Massachusetts Lowell have now created a processor which effectively contains more than a thousand cores on a single chip.

To do this, the scientists used a chip called a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) which like all microchips contains millions of transistors - the tiny on-off switches which are the foundation of any electronic circuit.

FPGAs can be configured into specific circuits by the user, rather than their function being set at a factory, which enabled Dr Vanderbauwhede to divide up the transistors within the chip into small groups and ask each to perform a different task.

By creating more than 1,000 mini-circuits within the FPGA chip, the researchers effectively turned the chip into a 1,000-core processor - each core working on its own instructions.

Dr Vanderbauwhede said: "FPGAs are not used within standard computers because they are fairly difficult to program but their processing power is huge while their energy consumption is very small because they are so much quicker - so they are also a greener option."

The researchers then used the chip to process an algorithm which is central to the MPEG movie format - used in YouTube videos - at a speed of five gigabytes per second, around 20 times faster than current top-end desktop computers.

While most computers sold now contain more than one processing core, which allows them to carry out different processes simultaneously, traditional multi-core processors must share access to one memory source, which slows the system down. The research scientists were able to make the processor faster by giving each core a certain amount of dedicated memory.

Dr Vanderbauwhede hopes to present his research at the International Symposium on Applied Reconfigurable Computing in March next year.

Source: Yahoo! News




2 Comments

Page 1 of 1

CoffeeFiend 

28 December 2010 - 10:10 AM
I hate to say this, but this is really bad journalism -- the kind that's written by someone who doesn't quite understand what he's writing about.

It's NOT an ultra-fast processor. At least, not in the "general purpose processor" sense that most people use. Even the most expensive FPGAs don't have enough gates to have 1000 non-trivial soft CPUs. You couldn't run an OS on such a "processor" as-is. . This is very, very much like the GPGPU solutions out there (based on CUDA or OpenCL), and there are already some video tools out there who even use it (e.g. badaboom) but all these solutions sacrifice quality for speed and the results are usually not so impressive. FPGAs and ASICs have been used for this for quite some time, and many such designs are available commercially, made precisely for this (this one for example). Either ways, I don't expect to see FPGAs dedicated to video-encoding (they're basically a one trick pony) in any "standard" computer anytime soon, doubly so when we now have GPGPU solutions for this. At best, I see something like this going into specialized equipment like super really-high-end tandberg codecs, and that's if it's actually any good...

jds 

05 January 2011 - 01:17 AM
Yeah, CoffeeFiend is right.

In fact, even the very first word of the article is almost certainly wrong. Scientists usually concern themselves with fundamental work such as physics, mathematics, and astronomy, whatever. The application of these fundamentals is usually the work of engineers, so with say, a 99% likelihood, the word Engineer should be substituted for Scientist throughout this article. Finally, microchips do NOT commonly contain millions of transistors, just a very small percentage of all the different microchips currently in production.

Joe.
You do not have permission to leave comments on this article
Page 1 of 1



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2013 msfn.org
Privacy Policy