 I see a lot of people run the Rollup as a hotfix., Is it faster than slipstreaming then? |
  |
 Oct 30 2003, 03:05 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Advanced Member  Group: Members Posts: 463 Joined: 31-July 03 From: Where The Streets have a name, but it can't be remembered. Member No.: 5342  |
My CD is setup with a slipstreamed Update Rollup as detailed in Aaron's guide. Should I just stick with this method or switch over to The Other Side (
 )?
|
 |
 
|
|
Oct 30 2003, 03:08 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Junior Group: Members Posts: 59 Joined: 27-July 03 Member No.: 5212 |
Nice question!
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 30 2003, 03:37 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Like a big surly teddy bear. Group: Members Posts: 3181 Joined: 31-August 03 From: Philadelphia, PA Member No.: 6091 
|
I shouldn't take any longer since you're actually running the hotfix one way or another. The advantage to slipstreaming is that if you ever have to insert your XP CD to copy a file across, it won't copy over an older file, breaking the update.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 30 2003, 04:26 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Elaborate Dreamer Group: Members Posts: 1836 Joined: 25-September 03 From: Indianapolis, IN Member No.: 7388
|
I have heard all too many issues with slipstreaming the rollup. I run it unattended and don't have any issues.
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th October 2008 - 12:28 AM |
All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
MSFN is not affiliated with Microsoft
Copyright © 2001-2008 msfn.org
Privacy Policy
MSFN is not affiliated with Microsoft
Copyright © 2001-2008 msfn.org
Privacy Policy