![]() ![]() |
Feb 27 2008, 11:38 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
VUD Pogrammer Group: Supreme Sponsors Posts: 1211 Joined: 9-February 07 From: Bridlington, North Humberside Member No.: 125866 OS: Vista Home Premium x64
|
Not sure if there is a topic already like this, but just wondering what everyone would like to see in Windows 7 (this isnt any official lol)
I would like to see:
What would you like to see? This post has been edited by LegoLiam™: Mar 6 2008, 09:34 PM |
|
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 12:33 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 646 Joined: 4-February 05 From: God's Own Country Member No.: 43021 OS: XP Pro x86
|
i fear that they might add one more VERSION for specifially for Gaming ( abt wga: due to high level of piracy for XP they designed much better protection agaist it in Vista, and is a success, if this works against piracy they just simply copy that to next ver. too. 1 & 4 may happen true with MinWin being core and add layers or apps above it |
|
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 12:44 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
VUD Pogrammer Group: Supreme Sponsors Posts: 1211 Joined: 9-February 07 From: Bridlington, North Humberside Member No.: 125866 OS: Vista Home Premium x64
|
If WGA works then they should go for it, about MinWin ive read about that... have they started it from scratch? Gaming version of windows 7, actually sounds abit better but i bet they make it expensive. whats your "wishlist" for Windows 7?
This post has been edited by LegoLiam™: Feb 27 2008, 08:32 PM |
|
|
|
Feb 28 2008, 08:56 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 646 Joined: 4-February 05 From: God's Own Country Member No.: 43021 OS: XP Pro x86
|
1. MinWin (microkernel) and component arch on x86-64 only
more like gnu/linux - run the full kernel with a console in minimal MinWin + cmd (or poweshell) so u need command expertise, shell scripting knowledge etc.. advantages: less mem.consumption by OS itself, more available 4 apps ability to add components, ie if u cant live without GUI add the component "Windows explorer" for Multimedia add components like Dx, WMP etc for browsing add component IE (no other way if they dont make console webbrowser like lynx) 2.ability to select componest b4 install (as u said and requisite for wish 1) 3.complete independence b/w IE & WE 4. Again independent WOW64, ie if u dont plan to use 32bit apps donot install it,maybe some APIs that convert x86 procedures to execute on x86-64 . 5. Can we expect so called WinFS atleast in win 7.? 6. (Hope not) some wacky idea for wga (give a magnetic card reader and a card along with the OS Disc, if it is put and authenticated and enter u PIN then u go otherwise no go(like ATM)), 7.no server/client os discrimination (install server appliance and work as server, remove it and work as workstation) and counting will post more when get some spark |
|
|
|
Feb 28 2008, 09:58 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
VUD Pogrammer Group: Supreme Sponsors Posts: 1211 Joined: 9-February 07 From: Bridlington, North Humberside Member No.: 125866 OS: Vista Home Premium x64
|
Got some nice ones up there
This post has been edited by LegoLiam™: Feb 28 2008, 09:59 AM |
|
|
|
Mar 2 2008, 07:58 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 2-March 08 From: usa wash state Member No.: 179951 OS: XP Pro x64
|
1. MinWin (microkernel) and component arch on x86-64 only more like gnu/linux - run the full kernel with a console in minimal MinWin + cmd (or poweshell) so u need command expertise, shell scripting knowledge etc.. advantages: less mem.consumption by OS itself, more available 4 apps ability to add components, ie if u cant live without GUI add the component "Windows explorer" for Multimedia add components like Dx, WMP etc for browsing add component IE (no other way if they dont make console webbrowser like lynx) 2.ability to select componest b4 install (as u said and requisite for wish 1) 3.complete independence b/w IE & WE 4. Again independent WOW64, ie if u dont plan to use 32bit apps donot install it,maybe some APIs that convert x86 procedures to execute on x86-64 . 5. Can we expect so called WinFS atleast in win 7.? 6. (Hope not) some wacky idea for wga (give a magnetic card reader and a card along with the OS Disc, if it is put and authenticated and enter u PIN then u go otherwise no go(like ATM)), 7.no server/client os discrimination (install server appliance and work as server, remove it and work as workstation) and counting will post more when get some spark the last one wont ever happen, ms makes to much off selling diffrent os versions for workstation and server use. i agree with some of what you said, and for server use a mode like windows home server where you dont need the GUI installed would be handy, mainly for remote managed servers. and to #6. for the love of god, dont give ms any ideas!!! WGA NEVER WORKS, DRM never works, within hours of an update to DRM/WGA somebodys found a fix, at most its days and a fix/crack is found, as the first post says, ms needs to just GIVE UP the antipiracy war, sell their os at a price that geeks can afford or are willing to pay. my vision of this as i have said b4 is thus. offer an "geek edition" of the os's that dosnt come with ANY support other then windows updates, no phone or email support(but email bug reporting ofcorse) and offer it of ALL editions of windows, charge a nomonal fee, 30-40-50-60-75 for diffrent editions,(server not included in that price list) if somebody who buys that edition of windows needs to call ms for support, charge by the minute or call for support, sell ms support prepayed cards at bestbuy and the like. as to the 32 vs 64 bit argument, i agree there shouldnt be a 32bit version of the os, BUT it should support older games and apps that are made to work on nt5 and up, i have ALOT of games that i play that i wouldnt want to loose just because some foolish people dont see the value in supporting older apps. some fetures i would like to see. 1. minwin or simlar kernal, strip out the lagacy code, use plugins/exct to support apps that need lagacy code support, allow that to be added when/if an app needs it and not be loaded other then to support those apps, like a compat libery. 2. better startup/shutdown tuning tools built into the os, msconfig isnt neerly as powerfull as i would like to see, allow the same work to be done by editing files. 3. move away from the current regestry design, move to a beos like file system that supports attributes to files that can do the same jobs as many reg settings for apps, this would make removing spicific software easyer, tho with the way windows works it would still need some kind of reg equivlant for some things. 4. like said above a mode/option to choose manualy all the stuff you want to install and dont want to install. 5. combine with above, no services enabled by default that arent needed, set them to manual like mode for services that are commonly used insted of auto, if somebody uses something alot they can choose to set it to auto OR use a wizzard(eww) to choose to set it to auto(like people who need windows image aquisition loaded on boot) 6. support for alternate gui's native, build a fraimwork that allows people to design custom gui's for windows that give the same fetures as default gui but can look totaly diffrent. now this one is a nice idea, BUT would need some basics some people here would complain about, it would need a default REQUIERED gui like basic explorer for remotedesktop from OEM's like Dell when helping noobs(like my father), this wouldnt need to be large, infact it could be quite small and compact and could be used as a base for other gui's to sit over (like windowblinds) 7. better driver fraimwork and install/remove management, todays drivers dont remove all their CRAP when they uninstall, this causes problems, i think if ms changed how the install/remove managment is done it would help, have the manager monotor all changes the installers do so it can reverce them insted of relying on install shield, if done properly this could be a boon to all users, because it could also allow easy updates without the need to run an uninstall then clean then restart and install new drivers, updating files would be fast and simple with the proper driver manager. thats most of my current wishes, i also would like to see better abstraction to prevent system lockups and crashes, and b4 any linux nut says that linux is imune to that, bs, i run linus/bsd on a couple systems, sometimes an app can force u to do a hard restart because when it buggers up, it takes the systemdown with it. Oh thought of another one!!! 8. better memory managment system that can detect app memory leaks and stop/prevent them from getting worse, also would be nice if you could limmit via rclick menus how much ram an app is allowed to use |
|
|
|
Mar 5 2008, 04:34 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 189 Joined: 10-May 05 Member No.: 55408
|
Make the destroy cross finally work like one.
In other words normal shutdown should be alt+f4 or menu and destroy should be just destroy. Just wipe the entire memoryspace of the app right away. Make it a ring 0 or hypervisor funktion so an app or driver can't interrupt this action. After all, it worked well on Solaris in the 90:s so it's time that we get it right too. |
|
|
|
Mar 6 2008, 03:19 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 3-November 07 Member No.: 160893 OS: Vista Ultimate x86
|
why not plug and play os like linux you will insert sd card and you pc will boot direct in to windows 7
it will be better than wga and the sd card will not store any thing your setting will be store on your HDD or SSD (solid state drives) so if your pc gets infected by virus your windows wont get infected and there wont be activation they will have user name and password (like eset nod) also the motherboard will have a slot for sd cards like you insert an graphics card then there wont be any piracy at all what do you think ? do you like my ideas |
|
|
|
Mar 6 2008, 05:27 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
VUD Pogrammer Group: Supreme Sponsors Posts: 1211 Joined: 9-February 07 From: Bridlington, North Humberside Member No.: 125866 OS: Vista Home Premium x64
|
I've alwyas thought of something like that
This post has been edited by LegoLiam™: Mar 6 2008, 05:28 PM |
|
|
|
Mar 6 2008, 09:24 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
I'm a few hundred PCs Group: Super Moderator Posts: 1070 Joined: 13-October 07 From: Oklahoma Member No.: 158212 OS: Vista Enterprise x86
|
1. 'unsigned' theme support out of the box. (ideally this would be like the gallery for sidebar clutter)
2. logon screen and boot screen customization (ability to bundle with the theme would be nice too) 3. ability to modify flip3d/minimize/maximize effects (bundling with themes/online gallery would be a nice touch) 4. native ability to change shortcut arrow for all shortcuts and ability to disable either per shortcut or all 5. always display the largest icon available for every icon. icons should never be scaled up always scaled down. implementing a gallery for this would be awesome (image if you could search online icon libraries natively) 6. better dual monitor support (MS should just buy the company that makes ultramon and roll it into 7) 7. remove every single 'access denied' prompt and replace it with an escalation prompt (UAC-like for home users, Username/password for domain) 8. allow an option for the 'All programs" menu to pop out of the start frame without haing to revert to the win2k style menu 9. make webdav work like it did in XP (wait i take that back i would prefer that it work properly) 10. ok Microsoft, blue is your thing. I understand that. just because you enjoy parading around in baby blue everything doesn't mean everyone else does. the only thing that youve skinned in the last 10 years that doesnt look like the boys section of a Babies 'R' Us exploded all over it is WMP11. Aero was a step in the right direction but i still have to hack 100 freakin' .dlls to rid myself of all the **** baby blue. Awesome. like most 'give your idea' threads I respond to, I started off constructive and end up ranting like a lunatic by the end of the post. Im making a note here: HUGE SUCCESS. |
|
|
|
Mar 7 2008, 02:29 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Junior ![]() Group: Members Posts: 58 Joined: 12-December 06 Member No.: 118362
|
That's all I can think of for now. I can't remember if Vista does all of point 7 or just some of it. I'm sure it's better than the XP, 2000 etc installer but don't recall it basing everything on it. |
|
|
|
Mar 7 2008, 05:16 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Bugmenot rules! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 991 Joined: 25-December 05 Member No.: 83402 OS: Vista Business x86
|
I want smaller system requirements.
|
|
|
|
Mar 11 2008, 04:05 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Senior Technician ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2221 Joined: 29-November 05 From: devnull Member No.: 81039 OS: Vista Ultimate x64
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 11 2008, 08:17 AM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 646 Joined: 4-February 05 From: God's Own Country Member No.: 43021 OS: XP Pro x86
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 11 2008, 08:55 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Trouble Starter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 725 Joined: 16-December 04 From: Rochester, NY Member No.: 38671 OS: none
|
* No backwards compatiblity - So just new software will work on it. But obviously old hardware too. Do you always contradict yourself? Windows supports old hardware because they include a ton of drivers on the disc for old hardware. Considering how diverse the PC industry is, this is a great thing. And all these legacy drivers work great too.Perhaps what you really want is to break backwards compatibility with old Windows applications, ala Mac OS10. Then when you try to execute an old program, it makes use of VirtualPC to run a Win95/98/ME session in a Window (minus the bootup and such). This would be a great thing for people that only use new programs as they'd have a leaner and meaner Windows, but a curse to those who run old programs because it means you need to tack on an extra 32mb block of ram for each legacy program. MS just won't go this route, because the Win9x support is free, all the old DLLs are still here, Windows 2000, XP, Vista merely build on top of them. So it would take LOTS of work to remove something that isn't broken for a very small gain. Heck, even .NET builds upon old parts of Windows uses various abstraction layers, so even new apps are legacy apps. Removing the Win9x stuff would break EVERYTHING. * Less Versions, no Home Basic, Home Premium, Ultimate, etc... Ok so then you only want to pay deluxe prices? Although what I don't like is the fact that Home Basic doesn't include the 3d UI which was suppose to be (and isn't) a big deal and it was the core part of their WOW advertising & tv commercial.* No WGA or activation - I don't use illegal software but within a week someone always figured out a way to get passed it, so id rather microsoft spent time/money on something useful! If it works then go for it WGA prevents mom & pop thieves that don't know any better, which probably account for 90% of piracy. At the very least, it stops corner store PC shops from installing the same copy of Windows on every PC they sell. So while it won't stop intelligent thieves, it still works great.* Gaming Mode - No need to explain that one DirectX10 and Vista already do this, I recall reading that Vista will suspend certain services when in full screen DX mode.Now for my list:
This post has been edited by TravisO: M |