Welcome to the Windows XP forum. If you have an error or a question make sure that you provide enough information to your fellow members in order to get a good answer, without information we cant answer you.
We try our best to keep this forum clean of illegal content. If you see any illegal activity use the "report" button you find in every post to report the specific post to the moderators.
![]() ![]() |
Dec 20 2001, 09:20 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
I am root, obey my authority! Group: Patrons Posts: 3139 Joined: 18-August 01 From: New Jersey Member No.: 12
|
Who should read this bulletin: Customers using Microsoft® Windows® ME or XP, or who have installed the Windows XP Internet Connection Sharing client on Windows 98 or 98SE.
Impact of vulnerability: Run code of attacker’s choice. Maximum Severity Rating: Critical Recommendation: Microsoft strongly urges all Windows XP customers to apply the patch immediately. Customers using Windows 98, 98SE or ME should apply the patch if the Universal Plug and Play service is installed and running. Affected Software: Microsoft Windows 98 Microsoft Windows 98SE Microsoft Windows ME Microsoft Windows XP get the patch here: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/...in/MS01-059.asp -XPerties |
|
|
|
Dec 23 2001, 06:26 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Its Time ... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2594 Joined: 23-December 01 From: Germany Member No.: 973
|
Be sure to switch off Universal Plug'n'Play as well. The patch don't really cover it all. Other words...it don't fully work! Check it out at http://www.neowin.net/comments.php?id=2111&category=main. Your best defense is to encrypt folders that contain confidential information like credit card numbers, passwords, etc. The best method is to keep confidential data on external media like zip disks, CD-R, etc. Ah, I'm tired of writing.
|
|
|
|
Dec 23 2001, 06:51 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Insane Clown Group: Administrator Posts: 14446 Joined: 16-August 01 From: Esbjerg Member No.: 1 OS: Vista Business x86
|
the best metod is to switch to linux
|
|
|
|
Dec 24 2001, 09:37 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 324 Joined: 7-September 01 Member No.: 294 |
yep.
|
|
|
|
Dec 28 2001, 04:43 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 134 Joined: 8-November 01 Member No.: 746 |
i find that the patches from xp slowed down my boot time
now i hafta wait a long time in the "load personal setting " screen what about u guys? |
|
|
|
Dec 28 2001, 07:29 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
I am root, obey my authority! Group: Patrons Posts: 3139 Joined: 18-August 01 From: New Jersey Member No.: 12
|
No promblem at all for me. Try running Bootvis to help excelerate your boot up time. It might help
-XPerties |
|
|
|
Dec 29 2001, 08:01 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 34 Joined: 5-November 01 Member No.: 709 |
Xpertise one thing I have found with bootvis is that if you use it and optimize the system it works fine for the first boot. System boots considerably faster, then after next boot it seems your back to square one again. Any reason for this. I normally run it through twice then optimize the last boot trace.
|
|
|
|
Dec 29 2001, 10:00 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
I am root, obey my authority! Group: Patrons Posts: 3139 Joined: 18-August 01 From: New Jersey Member No.: 12
|
Yah you should run it 2 times then optimize the last one, but I dont know why you would experiance it slowing down after the first boot. Havent heard that before but so many people get different results from it.
-XPerties |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th October 2008 - 04:34 AM |