IPB

Google Frontpage Forums Unattended CD/DVD Guide
 Forum Rules Windows Vista Forum Rules
8 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> A year later, Vista SP1 or XP SP3
A year later, Vista SP1 or XP SP3
Is Vista Good enough yet?
I am Sticking to XP [ 82 ] ** [56.16%]
Vista is great! [ 64 ] ** [43.84%]
Total Votes: 146
Guests cannot vote 
iwod
post Jul 15 2008, 11:37 AM
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 347
Joined: 26-March 04
Member No.: 16640



I am wondering what is the general opinion on Vista now. I have been switching between for the past months. Sometime i feel XP is better sometimes i feel Vista is great and smooth.

So What do you think?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
luke.mccormick
post Jul 15 2008, 11:49 AM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 213
Joined: 16-February 06
Member No.: 88157
OS: Vista Business x64
Country Flag


I think Vista works great if you have the system for it. Just ordered a ThinkPad T61 with 2.4 GHz C2D and 4 gigs of ram, 320 gig drive, so this should be great. I have it running on a 2.0 GHz C2D with 4 gigs of ram now and it works great. A few small application compatibility issues but other than that it's great, I have ways around them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zxian
post Jul 15 2008, 12:21 PM
Post #3


Scroll up - see the Google bar?
Group Icon

Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 5315
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Vancouver, Canada
Member No.: 32464
OS: Vista Ultimate x64
Country Flag


Wrong forum. I'm moving this to the Vista forum, since it belongs there more than any other area.

Topic Moved
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ODC
post Jul 15 2008, 08:47 PM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 136
Joined: 22-June 04
Member No.: 23175



After a 6 month trial on a P4 2.8GHz with 2GB RAM and a GeForce 7800, I re-installed XP a couple of days ago. I liked Vista, but it just wasn't fast enough with my older build. And there's still something wrong with file copy, because every now and then, a very small (kb) file will take minutes to copy.

I'll install it on my next system and see if things go better with a multi-core processor.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
shahed26
post Jul 15 2008, 09:04 PM
Post #5


Windows 7 BETA Tester
***

Group: Members
Posts: 436
Joined: 7-July 07
From: U.K
Member No.: 145825
OS: none
Country Flag


am running vista and xp on a dual boot system. I still prefer xp over vista, vista is smooth and feels good, but still there are many issues, and too many Unnecessary applications, services and too many Dependencies on each services. Vlite does the trick and makes it run better than XP, but i prefere a clean out of box stable fast OS, and thats not vista, its XP
XP SP3 MY VOTE!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hannubys
post Jul 15 2008, 09:14 PM
Post #6


Am I Not Merciful
****

Group: Members
Posts: 564
Joined: 20-January 08
From: Canada
Member No.: 172411
OS: Vista Business x64
Country Flag


Guys! Move foward vista, whatever you heard vista is great
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MagicAndre1981
post Jul 15 2008, 11:15 PM
Post #7


vLite and Vista lover :)
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1051
Joined: 28-August 05
From: Germany
Member No.: 70718
OS: Vista Ultimate x86
Country Flag


[x] Vista

I agree with hannubys smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
anonymous_user
post Jul 15 2008, 11:28 PM
Post #8


͏͏͏
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1028
Joined: 25-December 05
Member No.: 83402
OS: none
Country Flag


I agree with luke.mccormick > If you have adequate hardware, then Vista is great.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nitroshift
post Jul 16 2008, 01:01 AM
Post #9


Senior Technician
********

Group: Members
Posts: 2254
Joined: 29-November 05
From: devnull
Member No.: 81039
OS: Vista Business x64
Country Flag


Been running Vista since the 4000 builds and noticed the roadmap... It became my main OS for quite a while now and after SP1 my rig is flying, so Vista gets my vote smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
crahak
post Jul 16 2008, 02:12 AM
Post #10


Coffee Aficionado
********

Group: Members
Posts: 2994
Joined: 14-July 04
From: Coffeeland
Member No.: 24596
OS: Vista Ultimate x64
Country Flag


On a dual core box that's not memory starved? Vista SP1 for sure.

Older machines are likely better off with XP (never tried loading Vista on an old box)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Atheros
post Jul 16 2008, 08:45 AM
Post #11


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 49
Joined: 1-June 04
From: Portsmouth
Member No.: 21354
OS: XP Pro x86
Country Flag


if i had the cash spare i would now move to vista ultimate x64, considering that this is the way forward.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phoneywar
post Jul 16 2008, 11:01 AM
Post #12


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 35
Joined: 15-July 08
Member No.: 201056
OS: none
Country Flag


I've assessed two different Vista products on a range of hardware, took me nearly a month, and I would have to say it's not ready for the corporate environment. Even SP1 hasn't addressed more than a fraction of the issues I found. It's also horrendously overbloated with stuff that we will never use. It's far worse than W2k or XP in that regard. We will be sticking with W2k and XP for the forseeable future. We may even skip Vista altogether and wait for 'Windows 7'. Not that I expect that to be much better no.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fizban2
post Jul 16 2008, 02:47 PM
Post #13


MSFN Addict
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 1772
Joined: 14-April 05
From: Wisconsin
Member No.: 51914
OS: Vista Enterprise x64
Country Flag


QUOTE (Phoneywar @ Jul 16 2008, 12:01 PM) *
I've assessed two different Vista products on a range of hardware, took me nearly a month, and I would have to say it's not ready for the corporate environment. Even SP1 hasn't addressed more than a fraction of the issues I found. It's also horrendously overbloated with stuff that we will never use. It's far worse than W2k or XP in that regard. We will be sticking with W2k and XP for the forseeable future. We may even skip Vista altogether and wait for 'Windows 7'. Not that I expect that to be much better no.gif



waiting for windows 7 will not help you much since it will based on vista source code anyway. Problems you have with vista may or may not still present in Windows 7 and you will run into more compatibility problems in 7 as well if you wait to upgrade application/hardware etc. playing the waiting game with technology hoping the next version will be easier to use is a double edge sword.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ceez
post Jul 16 2008, 02:56 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 542
Joined: 6-September 03
Member No.: 6264



i love my xp.

i've tried vista and i just cant get the feel for it. I find it so much harder to navigate through menus and even finding the easy stuff like network connections.

the bad thing is that I am in the IT field....so eventually i will have to get down and dirty with vista and learn all the new troubleshooting techniques that i've mastered with xp.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
redxii
post Jul 16 2008, 03:15 PM
Post #15


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 288
Joined: 18-August 05
Member No.: 69413
OS: Vista Business x86
Country Flag


XP. My games are faster, runs fine otherwise. I only have a XP 3200+ (Barton) & Nforce 2.

Although there are some little things of Vista I like, like when copying multiple files the whole thing won't stop because of an error with one file, but I don't understand why something like that isn't in XP or why they haven't' fixed the tooltip problem in XP when the problem was known well before XP's release.

This post has been edited by redxii: Jul 16 2008, 03:35 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
crahak
post Jul 16 2008, 03:43 PM
Post #16


Coffee Aficionado
********

Group: Members
Posts: 2994
Joined: 14-July 04
From: Coffeeland
Member No.: 24596
OS: Vista Ultimate x64
Country Flag


QUOTE (ceez @ Jul 16 2008, 04:56 PM) *
I find it so much harder to navigate through menus and even finding the easy stuff like network connections.

That's always a bit confusing really. Most new windows versions tend to shuffle things around like this and renaming some stuff.

The quickest thing I know of to get to network connections (not start > control panel > network and sharing center > manage network connections, nor right clicking on the systray icon > network and sharing center > manage network connections), is win+r, ncpa.cpl (but yes, you have to remember the name now)

QUOTE (ceez @ Jul 16 2008, 04:56 PM) *
the bad thing is that I am in the IT field....so eventually i will have to [snip] learn all the new [snip]

And again, that's what it comes down to. We have to stay current smile.gif It's not just a Vista thing. New desktop OS, new server OS, new Exchange, new SQL Server, new dev tools, new hardware, new technologies, new apps, new ways to do things, new everything... It's a VERY rapidly changing field, and we're all struggling to keep current with everything.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TerryFox
post Jul 16 2008, 05:46 PM
Post #17


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 12-September 05
Member No.: 72652
Country Flag


I have had XP Pro since day one . I installed Vista on a another drive 2 months ago , I can boot up with either XP or Vista . I'm using Vista all the time now . So far I haven't had any problems either . So its Vista for me .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eyeball
post Jul 17 2008, 05:28 AM
Post #18


Have you tried turning it off and on again?
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1090
Joined: 28-October 05
From: uk
Member No.: 78007
OS: Vista Ultimate x64
Country Flag


Lol when i voted it was 50/50 (and yes i voted vista ohmy.gif )
Go to the top of the page