IPB

Google Frontpage Forums Unattended CD/DVD Guide
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> What has better drivers for a windows 98 box? Nvidia or Ati?
togermano
post Jul 7 2008, 08:02 AM
Post #1


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 45
Joined: 7-July 08
From: Springfield ,MA
Member No.: 199771
OS: 98SE
Country Flag


was just wondering.... and who was the first to stop supporting windows 98?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BATSoftware
post Jul 7 2008, 03:58 PM
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 25-July 07
Member No.: 148025
OS: 98SE
Country Flag


I have used ATI (FX7800) and NVIDIA (6800SE) within the last year. 2005 is the last NVIDIA driver update. It will support alot of the current GX cards. The ATI drivers about the same. PCI-EXPRESS is a another story. Before purchasing any GX card for a WIN98/SE system, I would check on the ATI and NVIDIA websites and verify that the chip set on the GX card is supported by the older drivers. Neither ATI or NVIDIA are updating WIN98 drivers.

BATSoftware
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
whatever420
post Jul 7 2008, 05:42 PM
Post #3


MSFN Expert
*

Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: 30-May 05
Member No.: 58269
OS: 98SE
Country Flag


QUOTE (togermano @ Jul 7 2008, 10:02 AM) *
What has better drivers for a windows 98 box? Nvidia or Ati?

I'm wondering the same thing...

Right now I'm running a Geforce2 MX 400 with the 71.84 drivers...
but...
I have a ATI RADEON 9800 PRO 128MB laying around (a used gift from my bro)...

Which ATI drivers would work best for the 9800...?

I don't need any fancy stuff, just the best working drivers...

Any suggestions?

Thanks smile.gif.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sysdll
post Jul 8 2008, 09:13 AM
Post #4


Junior
*

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 22-December 07
Member No.: 167785
OS: XP Pro x86
Country Flag


I recently replaced a GeForce MX 400 with a Radeon 9700 pro. The Catalyst 6.2 drivers are stable with Windows ME so they should be fine with 98 and 98se as well. There is a very noticeable difference in image quality with the Radeon.

This post has been edited by Sysdll: Jul 8 2008, 09:18 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
shae
post Jul 8 2008, 01:02 PM
Post #5


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 6-July 08
Member No.: 199642
OS: none
Country Flag


My experience with ATI was a Radeon DDR which I've used for a while. Other than that it's been nVidia TNT, TNT2, FX5200.

I disliked ATI's drivers. It's a mess. Unclear versioning scheme (Did you know that Catalyst 5.2 is also known as v8.03.98.3-050117a-021000e? :). Messy installer (I think I ultimately had to manually install the drivers). Standalone driver control software. I vaguely remember a problem with full screen DOS.

NV's installation is much smoother and their versioning makes more sense. (But their video support is an issue, and having to use different drivers for different games is stupid at best. But maybe ATI suffers from that too, I don't know.)

This post has been edited by shae: Jul 8 2008, 01:02 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Google Frontpage Forums Unattended CD/DVD Guide

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th January 2009 - 09:52 PM
All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
MSFN is not affiliated with Microsoft
Copyright © 2001-2008 msfn.org
Privacy Policy