![]() ![]() |
May 25 2006, 07:27 AM Post
#581 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
So how's 60523a doing IRL? |
| | |
May 25 2006, 07:27 AM Post
#582 | |
| Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 25-May 06 Member No.: 97216 | thanks alot to you, tomcat76! i am using livestate too and had problems because wmplayer10 and scriptde.exe gave me errors during the installation process (. i just tried your new test-release (HFSLIP_60523a) and now it works! during second copying phase in setup i got errors for 40 files, starting with qasf.dll scrobj.dll scrrun.dll wshcon.dll ... so if you encounter problems with livestate or winnt.exe installations - try this new release! |
| | |
May 25 2006, 11:24 AM Post
#583 | |
| MSFN Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1182 Joined: 6-January 06 From: Manila, Philippines Member No.: 84520 OS: XP Pro x86 |
i think 60523a is quite stable as there has been not much reported issues w/ it ... perhaps a final then? |
| | |
May 26 2006, 03:37 AM Post
#584 | |
| Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 24-April 06 Member No.: 94561 |
Hi all! I have question about: KB912817 KB918005 Are they handled by current HFSLIP? |
| | |
May 26 2006, 03:47 AM Post
#585 | |
| MSFN Expert Group: Software Developers Posts: 1467 Joined: 9-January 04 Member No.: 12184 OS: none | |
| | |
May 26 2006, 04:54 AM Post
#586 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
@SQ5FG: I quickly checked them and they should be supported. If no new test version will be released, the only difference between the current test version and the next final will be: added support for IUCTL.CAB in conjunction with RVM Update Pack when WindowsUpdateAgent20.exe is absent. Checked OK: - WinXP SP2 English + RVM Update Pack - WinXP SP2 Dutch + SWFLASH.CAB Still to be checked: WinXP SP1 + Win2K USP5 This post has been edited by Tomcat76: May 26 2006, 05:17 AM |
| | |
May 26 2006, 12:47 PM Post
#587 | |
| MSFN Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1182 Joined: 6-January 06 From: Manila, Philippines Member No.: 84520 OS: XP Pro x86 |
hi SQ5FG! for hotifxes supported by HFSLIP, you may always cross refer with: Windows XP updates and hotfixes (maintained by Tomcat76) http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=62177 Windows XP (all) (maintained by the guy) http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=74840 |
| | |
May 27 2006, 02:52 AM Post
#588 | |
| Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 24-April 06 Member No.: 94561 |
Thank you guys! :-) I am going to do my slipstream and finally reinstall my current faulty system. :-) |
| | |
May 27 2006, 05:01 AM Post
#589 | |
| MSFN Addict ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1760 Joined: 22-May 05 From: Paris Member No.: 57090 OS: none | Q911565 - wmpui.dll is part of WMP8 but not of WMP9 or 10. When you upgrade to WMP9 or 10, WMPUI.DLL is not updated; it isn't even used. I tried latest test release without nlite; wmpui.dll should be updated since I have WMP8 (which I usually remove with nLite). Other updates seem to be alright (though I still have to test two of them I did not have in \HF) edit: @Tomcat, 833989 seems to be needed but you do not list it. It corrects the GDI+ vulnerability. It is really confusing because lots of applications are concerned but I think I finally understood it: -KB833987 updates Windows GDI+ component -KB833989 updates IE6 SP1 GDI+ component See this page (in french) http://www.microsoft.com/france/technet/se...e/ms04-028.mspx The IE6 patch is listed at the middle of the page and contains vgx.dll. This post has been edited by Camarade_Tux: May 27 2006, 05:11 AM |
| | |
May 27 2006, 05:15 AM Post
#590 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
@Camarade_Tux: HFSLIP didn't process KB911565 because of an old restriction for KB817787. That's corrected now. Quite a coincidence... I was testing XPSP1 the last couple of hours and noticed the same thing... We're nearing in. I still need to do some stress-testing on Win2K, especially with USP5 as there seem to be some problems in that domain. |
| | |
May 27 2006, 06:25 AM Post
#591 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
I updated my XP SP1 hotfix lists (thanks Camarade_Tux). I hope everything is OK now...
This post has been edited by Tomcat76: May 27 2006, 06:26 AM |
| | |
May 27 2006, 06:27 AM Post
#592 | |
| MSFN Addict ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1760 Joined: 22-May 05 From: Paris Member No.: 57090 OS: none |
Ok. Anyway, with latest test version, everything is OK. All updates are present, tested without nLite. HFNetChk reports all WMP updates are present, MDAC update not present (normal since I don't want it), and two files version greater as expected. And just a quick note : these files are post-installed: Q914798.EXE Q840374.EXE Q832483.EXE Thanks a lot for this version. |
| | |
May 27 2006, 08:21 AM Post
#593 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
Win2K with SP4 and hotfixes went OK except that the MDAC 2.5 SP3 hotfix wasn't processed. That's fixed in 60527b. Still to go: Win2K + USP5... @Camarade_Tux: That's great. Thanks |
| | |
May 27 2006, 11:28 AM Post
#594 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
USP5 is a strange thing. Kramy already told me the other day he got file copy errors in the beginning of Windows setup and I experienced the same a few hours ago. I traced it down to the slipstreaming of the USP5 service pack itself: some binaries (413 to be exact) are not copied into the source. This can only mean two things: - my w2ksp51.exe file is corrupt - the standard MS service pack switches are not supported by USP5 I checked the FAQ on the Hotstream forum and noticed that only the /integrate method is listed as a supported slipstreaming method. So I tried that, but the result is the same. I'm now in the process of downloading the latest version... Be back in an hour or so... This post has been edited by Tomcat76: May 27 2006, 11:28 AM |
| | |
May 27 2006, 12:34 PM Post
#595 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
I'm gonna ask for support on the Hotstream forum. I download the latest version and the same thing is happening. I even slipstreamed (or attempted to slipstream) USP5 outside of HFSLIP...
|
| | |
May 27 2006, 04:26 PM Post
#596 | |
| Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 153 Joined: 3-June 05 Member No.: 58925 |
Ok, here's the lastest I've got - these screenshots show the discrepancy. The first two are of my flawelessly working HFSLIP mod ver. The second 3 are of the latest test release.
HFSLIP_60422_CMD.png ( 9.78K )
Number of downloads: 70
HFSLIP_60422_Folder.png ( 6.43K )
Number of downloads: 152Notice the filesize differences...and that even stream.sys is missing from it.
HFSLIP_60526b_CMD.png ( 10.81K )
Number of downloads: 43
HFSLIP_60526b_Folder.png ( 6.44K )
Number of downloads: 46Also, a missing file on the first line - not sure what, and haven't checked if my perfectly working ver has that or not.
HFSLIP_FirstLine.png ( 13.44K )
Number of downloads: 142I know that Tomcat rearranged a lot of slipstreaming code, and while poking around today I caught a few errors. Sadly, I didn't notice them when I originally duplicated them, so I had to fix them in my ver as well. Due to the particular order though, they had no effect in my version. It appears that "ELSE" is not a recognizable command unless it's on the same line as an IF. CODE :HFSPACK4 ECHO SLIPSTREAMING SERVICE PACK... SET HFSLIPSVPACK=1 MD SPEX\i386 IF "%VERSION%"=="2000" ( IF EXIST HF\w2ksp5*.exe (CALL :UNPACK_2KUSP) ELSE IF EXIST HF\w2ksp4*.exe (CALL :UNPACK_2KSP4) ) IF "%VERSION%"=="XP" ( IF EXIST HF\*835935*.exe (CALL :UNPACK_XPSP2) ELSE IF EXIST HF\xpsp1a*.exe (CALL :UNPACK_XPSP1A) ELSE IF EXIST HF\xpsp1*.exe (CALL :UNPACK_XPSP1) ) IF "%VERSION%"=="2003" ( ECHO SLIPSTREAMING SERVICE PACK 1 INTO WINDOWS 2003. PLEASE BE PATIENT. FOR /F %%I IN ('DIR/B HFSPACK\*889101*.exe') DO START/WAIT HFSPACK\%%I /Q /X:SPEX\ ) IF EXIST SOURCE\I386\SVCPACK.INF DEL/Q/F SOURCE\I386\SVCPACK.INF START/WAIT SPEX\i386\update\update.exe -u -n -o -q -s:"%~dp0SOURCE\" RD/Q/S SPEX ECHO FINISHED SLIPSTREAMING THE SERVICE PACK. ECHO. GOTO EOF :UNPACK_2KSP4 ECHO SLIPSTREAMING SERVICE PACK 4 INTO WINDOWS 2000. PLEASE BE PATIENT. FOR /F %%I IN ('DIR/B HF\w2ksp4*.exe') DO START/WAIT HF\%%I /Q /X:SPEX\ GOTO :EOF :UNPACK_2KUSP ECHO SLIPSTREAMING GURGELMEYER USP5 INTO WINDOWS 2000. PLEASE BE PATIENT. FOR /F %%I IN ('DIR/B HF\w2ksp5*.exe') DO START/WAIT HF\%%I /Q /X:SPEX\ GOTO :EOF :UNPACK_XPSP1 ECHO SLIPSTREAMING SERVICE PACK 1 INTO WINDOWS XP. PLEASE BE PATIENT. FOR /F %%I IN ('DIR/B HF\xpsp1*.exe') DO START/WAIT HF\%%I /Q /X:SPEX\i386\ GOTO :EOF :UNPACK_XPSP1A ECHO SLIPSTREAMING SERVICE PACK 1A INTO WINDOWS XP. PLEASE BE PATIENT. FOR /F %%I IN ('DIR/B HF\xpsp1a*.exe') DO START/WAIT HF\%%I /Q /X:SPEX\i386\ GOTO :EOF :UNPACK_XPSP2 ECHO SLIPSTREAMING SERVICE PACK 2 INTO WINDOWS XP. PLEASE BE PATIENT. FOR /F %%I IN ('DIR/B HF\*835935*.exe') DO START/WAIT HF\%%I /Q /X:SPEX\ DEL/Q/F SPEX\i386\update\setupapi.dll GOTO :EOF However, the above folder sizes were taken after applying the ELSE fix. Now I need to test if my latest ISO will install, which I doubt it will with several hundred missing files. I'll report back on if it works or not. |
| | |
May 27 2006, 07:19 PM Post
#597 | |
| Friend of MSFN ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 969 Joined: 15-January 06 Member No.: 85355 OS: Vista Ultimate x86 |
Kramy: I do not believe any ELSE fix was required. In all of the original code for the :HFSPACK4 section (60527c), the ELSE commands were on the same line as the corresponding IF commands. If the problem you are experiencing is indeed an HFSLIP script problem, I guess Tomcat must have gone too crazy with the cleanup |
| | |
May 27 2006, 08:16 PM Post
#598 | |
| Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 153 Joined: 3-June 05 Member No.: 58925 |
Ahh, he must have beat me to it then. |
| | |
May 28 2006, 02:23 AM Post
#599 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 | Ahh, he must have beat me to it then. Yep... That problem was fixed in the 27c release.Either way, the one remaining problem (414 missing files) is not an HFSLIP problem. I suggest we continue that discussion in the other thread. I've sent a new final version of HFSLIP to TommyP a couple of hours ago which is based on 60527c but has the USP5 functionality stripped out. I'll let him decide what we're gonna do... |
| | |
May 28 2006, 04:18 PM Post
#600 | |
| Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 153 Joined: 3-June 05 Member No.: 58925 |
I don't understand how it can't be an HFSLIP problem, since I have a totally fine older version of HFSLIP that outputs a working slipstreamed & nLitable SOURCESS every time. |
| | |
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 06:03 PM |