Mar 12 2006, 02:26 PM Post
#1 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
These versions are test builds and are pretty much stable. As usual, use them at your own risk. A new final was released on November 9, 2009. If you were referred to this thread prior to November 9, please get the final from the main thread. HFSLIP home page ********************************************************* I hope tomcat76 doesn't mind me [tommyp] editting this post to add in a beta test build. See attachment for beta testing in preparation for the next final. Bugfixes: There are no betas at the current time. ********************************************************* You can help by checking if the binary removal files (2000SP4.EXT, XPSP1.EXT and XPSP2.EXT) cover everything. Download dumpdupes.cmd and place it in the main HFSLIP folder (alongside the normal HFSLIP executable). Run this tool AFTER you ran HFSLIP (it namely requires a SOURCE and a SOURCESS folder to compare). If there are any duplicate binaries that can be removed, a file called EXCLUDE.TXT will be created. Let me know if it contains additional files to those that already exist in the current removal files. This program can be used to check Windows 2000, XP and 2003 sources. Dumpdupes.cmd has one limitation: it only checks for duplicates in the current sources. This tool would have to be run again whenever new hotfixes arrive in order to ensure the list is up to date. I'll probably make another tool that outputs a full list of any driver binary that isn't supposed to be loose in I386 once I evaluated the pros and cons of both.[attachment=25420:hfslip_beta_Mar30.zip] This post has been edited by tommyp: Nov 9 2009, 06:57 PM |
| | |
![]() |
Jun 16 2006, 10:00 AM Post
#681 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 | Here's two options for you (all from HFSVCPACK)... Is this built into the 060616a?BTW... I just updated MultiCompiler 2. If both .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 are detected, it asks you whether you want to merge it all into one file... |
| | |
Jun 16 2006, 10:50 AM Post
#682 | |
| Junior ![]() Group: Members Posts: 66 Joined: 11-July 05 Member No.: 64020 | Here's two options for you (all from HFSVCPACK)... Is this built into the 060616a?BTW... I just updated MultiCompiler 2. If both .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 are detected, it asks you whether you want to merge it all into one file... I just meant because of the filenames. Should naming a certain way order the install? I think I will just continue installing at first reboot. That worked for my situation. This post has been edited by NtegrA: Jun 16 2006, 10:52 AM |
| | |
Jun 16 2006, 12:13 PM Post
#683 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
HFSLIP just copies the files from HFSVCPACK into SOURCESS\I386\SVCPACK and echoes the executable names into SVCPACK.INF alphabetically. So if the order is important change the name(s) and you're good to go. Looking at your other thread, you're already doing that.
This post has been edited by Tomcat76: Jun 16 2006, 12:15 PM |
| | |
Jun 16 2006, 12:16 PM Post
#684 | |
| Junior ![]() Group: Members Posts: 66 Joined: 11-July 05 Member No.: 64020 | |
| | |
Jun 16 2006, 12:20 PM Post
#685 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
Whoops... It just occured to me that I'm mixing you up with someone else... There is no "other thread" from you and I didn't ask you to try MC2 before... Looks like I'm the one who needs some sleep, hehe... |
| | |
Jun 16 2006, 05:17 PM Post
#686 | |
| MSFN Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1182 Joined: 6-January 06 From: Manila, Philippines Member No.: 84520 OS: XP Pro x86 |
hi! just wanted to share ... i saw these ran through my screen ... SBP-2 drive stops responding when you try to write data in Windows XP WindowsXP-KB885464-x86-ENU.EXE TEMP\SP2QFE\ohci1394.sys 1 File(s) copied 0 File(s) copied Initialization phase of a Setup program may take longer than expected to complete in Windows XP WindowsXP-KB885898-x86-ENU.EXE TEMP\SP2QFE\msi.dll TEMP\SP2QFE\msiexec.exe 2 File(s) copied 0 File(s) copied A component that runs in the same process as the Windows Time service is stopped or is disabled unexpectedly in Windows XP WindowsXP-KB888432-x86-ENU.EXE TEMP\SP2QFE\w32time.dll 1 File(s) copied 0 File(s) copied MS05-020: Cumulative security update for Internet Explorer WindowsXP-KB890923-x86-ENU.exe TEMP\SP2GDR\browseui.dll TEMP\SP2GDR\cdfview.dll TEMP\SP2GDR\iepeers.dll TEMP\SP2GDR\inseng.dll TEMP\SP2GDR\mshtml.dll TEMP\SP2GDR\msrating.dll TEMP\SP2GDR\shdocvw.dll TEMP\SP2GDR\shlwapi.dll TEMP\SP2GDR\urlmon.dll TEMP\SP2GDR\wininet.dll 10 File(s) copied 0 File(s) copied Packet-writing programs for optical media recording devices run slower than expected on Windows XP Service Pack 2-based computers WindowsXP-KB891070-x86-ENU.EXE TEMP\SP2QFE\ntkrnlmp.exe TEMP\SP2QFE\ntkrnlpa.exe TEMP\SP2QFE\ntkrpamp.exe TEMP\SP2QFE\ntoskrnl.exe 4 File(s) copied 0 File(s) copied FIX: You may receive a "Page cannot be displayed" error message when you click a hyperlink to view a Microsoft Office document in Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1 WindowsXP-KB892056-x86-ENU.EXE TEMP\SP2QFE\mshtml.dll TEMP\SP2QFE\urlmon.dll 2 File(s) copied 0 File(s) copied FIX: You may receive a "This operation has been canceled due to restrictions in effect on this computer" error message when you try to open the Internet Options dialog box in Internet Explorer 6 WindowsXP-KB894179-x86-ENU.EXE TEMP\SP2QFE\shdocvw.dll 1 File(s) copied 0 File(s) copied Software update 898461 installs a permanent copy of the Package Installer for Windows version 6.1.22.4 WindowsXP-KB898461-x86-ENU.exe 0 File(s) copied The embedded resource version of the LIP MUI files is incorrect in Windows XP Starter Edition WindowsXP-KB913808-x86-ENU.exe 0 File(s) copied i may have to take these out or would this be script related issue? incidentally, i noticed that 60615a was a bit smaller in file size (144 as compared to 145 in earlier vers) ... moreover, the slipstreaming time went down to 30-31mins again for me ... just like what i mentioned in my embarrassing post earlier, it used to last as long as 40+ mins ... considering i even added the newer updates using 60615a ... i just hope this post is not yet too late knowing that 60616a is already out ... (which i already downloaded) thanks! This post has been edited by Kiki Burgh: Jun 16 2006, 05:26 PM |
| | |
Jun 16 2006, 07:53 PM Post
#687 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
Huh, what? I've never seen this before.... |
| | |
Jun 17 2006, 01:49 AM Post
#688 | |
| SQL DBA ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 183 Joined: 28-July 05 Member No.: 66411 |
Question: Is it possible to add a feature in HFSLIP to ignore MAKENOISO in HFANSWER.INI if in MAKEISO mode? |
| | |
Jun 17 2006, 07:21 AM Post
#689 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
The "MAKENOISO" feature was introduced in 13a and your suggestion (Super-Magician's suggestion, actually) was implemented in 13b... So no need to implement it again... |
| | |
Jun 17 2006, 07:33 AM Post
#690 | |
| Friend of MSFN ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 969 Joined: 15-January 06 Member No.: 85355 OS: Vista Ultimate x86 | QUOTE i just hope this post is not yet too late knowing that 60616a is already out We're already up to 60616b now |
| | |
Jun 17 2006, 08:39 AM Post
#691 | |
| SQL DBA ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 183 Joined: 28-July 05 Member No.: 66411 |
Oh, I'm still using 60612a... then the next time I logged in it's already 60616b! Thanks for that feature anyway. Very much appreciated. |
| | |
Jun 17 2006, 08:29 PM Post
#692 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
60617b is "the RC", people. If no new problems have been introduced over 60528, this will be released as the new final on Sunday evening. |
| | |
Jun 18 2006, 12:36 AM Post
#693 | |
| SQL DBA ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 183 Joined: 28-July 05 Member No.: 66411 |
So I tried 60617b with INSTALLRC=1 and WINNTUPG folder present: an error message popped out at T-13 telling me that NETMAP.INF was not found, so I had to press OK, then another dialog box saying the "Windows XP Setup cannot continue" (something like that) and I had to click 'Finished...'
|
| | |
Jun 18 2006, 02:31 AM Post
#694 | |
| MSFN Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1182 Joined: 6-January 06 From: Manila, Philippines Member No.: 84520 OS: XP Pro x86 | Huh, what? I've never seen this before.... hi TC!these were basically like what i posted before ... pls don't mind the headers (i just inserted those on top of the real messages) ... it's the same for the others ... my apologies for the confusion ... A component that runs in the same process as the Windows Time service is stopped or is disabled unexpectedly in Windows XP ---> this is what i inserted WindowsXP-KB888432-x86-ENU.EXE ---> HFSLIP shows the following lines TEMP\SP2QFE\w32time.dll 1 File(s) copied 0 File(s) copied Super-Magician ... i already downloaded the latest thanks! |
| | |
Jun 18 2006, 08:48 AM Post
#695 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 | @Kiki: I already explained where the "0 File(s) copied" comes from.... So I tried 60617b with INSTALLRC=1 and WINNTUPG folder present: an error message popped out at T-13 telling me that NETMAP.INF was not found, so I had to press OK, then another dialog box saying the "Windows XP Setup cannot continue" (something like that) and I had to click 'Finished...' The only reasons I can think of:1) You don't have NETMAP.INF in WINNTUPG 2) WINNTUPG is not in the right place (it should be in I386) 3) You have an I386 folder in the root of a local partition (eg, C:\), and there is no NETMAP.INF in there HFSLIP instructs Windows to execute the standard installation command, but with the /unattend switch added to it to make it silent. |
| | |
Jun 18 2006, 09:43 AM Post
#696 | |
| MSFN Expert Group: Software Developers Posts: 1467 Joined: 9-January 04 Member No.: 12184 OS: none | 60617b is "the RC", people. If no new problems have been introduced over 60528, this will be released as the new final on Sunday evening. T - Please allow a few more days for others to test and report back. Sit back, don't code, relax and wait for the population's feedback. Once all is fine, then go for it. |
| | |
Jun 18 2006, 12:54 PM Post
#697 | |
| MSFN Addict ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1760 Joined: 22-May 05 From: Paris Member No.: 57090 OS: none | French XP SP1a reports, Sir! QUOTE Patch NOT Installed MS04-024 Q839645 This does the trick:The registry key **Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\ZoneMap\ProtocolDefaults\shell** does not exist. It is required for this patch to be considered installed. CODE Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\ZoneMap\ProtocolDefaults] "shell"=dword:00000000 Next: QUOTE Patch NOT Installed MS06-011 Q914798 The registry key **SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Updates\Windows XP\SP2\KB914798** should have a value of 2. It has a value of 1. Solution: CODE Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Updates\Windows XP\SP2\KB914798] "Installed"=dword:00000002 This one is a problem: QUOTE Patch NOT Installed MS06-021 Q916281 File C:\WIN\system32\browseui.dll has a file version [6.0.2800.1106]that is less than what is expected [6.0.2800.1692]. And now files greater than expected: QUOTE Warning MS05-051 Q902400 File C:\WIN\system32\txflog.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64]that is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\rpcss.dll has a file version [5.1.2600.1801] that is greater than what is expected [5.1.2600.1720]. - File C:\WIN\system32\olecnv32.dll has a file version [5.1.2600.1801] that is greater than what is expected [5.1.2600.1720]. - File C:\WIN\system32\olecli32.dll has a file version [5.1.2600.1801] that is greater than what is expected [5.1.2600.1720]. - File C:\WIN\system32\ole32.dll has a file version [5.1.2600.1801] that is greater than what is expected [5.1.2600.1720]. - File C:\WIN\system32\es.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\comuid.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\comsvcs.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\comrepl.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\com\comadmin.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\colbact.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\clbcatq.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\clbcatex.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\catsrvut.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\catsrv.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. * INTERNET EXPLORER 6 SP1 Warning MS05-044 Q905495 File C:\WIN\system32\msieftp.dll has a file version [6.0.2800.1724] that is greater than what is expected [5.50.4956.500]. |
| | |
Jun 18 2006, 03:43 PM Post
#698 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
@Camarade_Tux: #1 is odd. HFSLIP copies the installation INF from the hotfix package, and it contains the registry entry you need. So it's strange that the key isn't created. This is the relevant line: HKLM,"Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\ZoneMap\ProtocolDefaults","shell",0x10001,0x0 It could be that the "0x0" makes it fail but I'm not sure. #2 is a problem. This hotfix doesn't contain any updated binaries and the installation INF has a name (update_SP1QFE.inf) which is normally associated with an installation folder called SP1QFE which isn't present. These hotfixes are given special treatment but for some reason this fails. The installation INF (which contains the necessary info) is not handled (or at least doesn't end up in SOURCESS\I386). I also see this installation INF is doing some special stuff which is beyond the scope of a "default" install. I'm going to have it installed from SVCPACK but not before I found out why the INF is not processed for such hotfixes. I still need to check #3. |
| | |
Jun 18 2006, 04:55 PM Post
#699 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
@Camarade_Tux: #1... The key is being inserted if you use HFSLIP 60618a. I'm still wondering why it fails. Do you have this key at least: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Hotfix\KB839645 That's the other reg key created by the hotfix. #2... Heh. It looks like HFSLIP already puts this hotfix in SVCPACK. Where are my thoughts? HFSLIP lets this hotfix install itself so there's nothing that can be done (at least not easily). If I just insert a reg key from HFSLIPWU.INF it will be overwritten when the hotfix installs. It's strange that HFNetChk complains about something that the hotfix does... #3... Fixed. The IE6 cumulative updates for XPSP1 need the RTMQFE binary versions. I forgot to update HFSLIP for the new cumulative update. |
| | |
Jun 18 2006, 06:23 PM Post
#700 | |
| Creator of the Windows ME Service Pack ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 899 Joined: 15-July 05 Member No.: 64572 |
From the browseui.dll issue, it appears browseui.dll wouldn't copy over from the hotfix to the sourcess folder. the_guy |
| | |
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 07:50 PM |