IPB

Google Frontpage Forums Unattended CD/DVD Guide
112 Pages V  « < 33 34 35 36 37 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> HFSLIP - Test releases, No testing at the moment
Tomcat76
post Jun 16 2006, 10:00 AM
Post #681


MSFN Junkie
Group Icon

Group: Software Developers
Posts: 3171
Joined: 8-August 05
From: Flanders, Belgium
Member No.: 68008
OS: 2000
Country Flag


QUOTE (NtegrA @ Jun 16 2006, 03:38 PM) *
QUOTE (Tomcat76 @ Jun 16 2006, 06:36 AM) *
Here's two options for you (all from HFSVCPACK)...
Is this built into the 060616a?
HFSLIP has always supported silent installers from HFSVCPACK (formerly HFSVPK).

BTW... I just updated MultiCompiler 2. If both .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 are detected, it asks you whether you want to merge it all into one file... woot.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NtegrA
post Jun 16 2006, 10:50 AM
Post #682


Junior
*

Group: Members
Posts: 66
Joined: 11-July 05
Member No.: 64020
Country Flag


QUOTE (Tomcat76 @ Jun 16 2006, 11:00 AM) *
QUOTE (NtegrA @ Jun 16 2006, 03:38 PM) *
QUOTE (Tomcat76 @ Jun 16 2006, 06:36 AM) *
Here's two options for you (all from HFSVCPACK)...
Is this built into the 060616a?
HFSLIP has always supported silent installers from HFSVCPACK (formerly HFSVPK).

BTW... I just updated MultiCompiler 2. If both .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 are detected, it asks you whether you want to merge it all into one file... woot.gif

I just meant because of the filenames. Should naming a certain way order the install? I think I will just continue installing at first reboot. That worked for my situation.

This post has been edited by NtegrA: Jun 16 2006, 10:52 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tomcat76
post Jun 16 2006, 12:13 PM
Post #683


MSFN Junkie
Group Icon

Group: Software Developers
Posts: 3171
Joined: 8-August 05
From: Flanders, Belgium
Member No.: 68008
OS: 2000
Country Flag


HFSLIP just copies the files from HFSVCPACK into SOURCESS\I386\SVCPACK and echoes the executable names into SVCPACK.INF alphabetically. So if the order is important change the name(s) and you're good to go. Looking at your other thread, you're already doing that.

This post has been edited by Tomcat76: Jun 16 2006, 12:15 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NtegrA
post Jun 16 2006, 12:16 PM
Post #684


Junior
*

Group: Members
Posts: 66
Joined: 11-July 05
Member No.: 64020
Country Flag


QUOTE (Tomcat76 @ Jun 16 2006, 01:13 PM) *
echoes the executable names into SVCPACK.INF alphabetically.
DUH, I wasn't paying attention Dosnet2 before netfxsp1. I really need some sleep!!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tomcat76
post Jun 16 2006, 12:20 PM
Post #685


MSFN Junkie
Group Icon

Group: Software Developers
Posts: 3171
Joined: 8-August 05
From: Flanders, Belgium
Member No.: 68008
OS: 2000
Country Flag


Whoops... It just occured to me that I'm mixing you up with someone else... There is no "other thread" from you and I didn't ask you to try MC2 before...

Looks like I'm the one who needs some sleep, hehe... laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kiki Burgh
post Jun 16 2006, 05:17 PM
Post #686


MSFN Expert
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1182
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Manila, Philippines
Member No.: 84520
OS: XP Pro x86
Country Flag


hi!
just wanted to share ... i saw these ran through my screen ...

SBP-2 drive stops responding when you try to write data in Windows XP
WindowsXP-KB885464-x86-ENU.EXE
TEMP\SP2QFE\ohci1394.sys
1 File(s) copied
0 File(s) copied

Initialization phase of a Setup program may take longer than expected to complete in Windows XP
WindowsXP-KB885898-x86-ENU.EXE
TEMP\SP2QFE\msi.dll
TEMP\SP2QFE\msiexec.exe
2 File(s) copied
0 File(s) copied

A component that runs in the same process as the Windows Time service is stopped or is disabled unexpectedly in Windows XP
WindowsXP-KB888432-x86-ENU.EXE
TEMP\SP2QFE\w32time.dll
1 File(s) copied
0 File(s) copied

MS05-020: Cumulative security update for Internet Explorer
WindowsXP-KB890923-x86-ENU.exe
TEMP\SP2GDR\browseui.dll
TEMP\SP2GDR\cdfview.dll
TEMP\SP2GDR\iepeers.dll
TEMP\SP2GDR\inseng.dll
TEMP\SP2GDR\mshtml.dll
TEMP\SP2GDR\msrating.dll
TEMP\SP2GDR\shdocvw.dll
TEMP\SP2GDR\shlwapi.dll
TEMP\SP2GDR\urlmon.dll
TEMP\SP2GDR\wininet.dll
10 File(s) copied
0 File(s) copied

Packet-writing programs for optical media recording devices run slower than expected on Windows XP Service Pack 2-based computers
WindowsXP-KB891070-x86-ENU.EXE
TEMP\SP2QFE\ntkrnlmp.exe
TEMP\SP2QFE\ntkrnlpa.exe
TEMP\SP2QFE\ntkrpamp.exe
TEMP\SP2QFE\ntoskrnl.exe
4 File(s) copied
0 File(s) copied

FIX: You may receive a "Page cannot be displayed" error message when you click a hyperlink to view a Microsoft Office document in Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1
WindowsXP-KB892056-x86-ENU.EXE
TEMP\SP2QFE\mshtml.dll
TEMP\SP2QFE\urlmon.dll
2 File(s) copied
0 File(s) copied

FIX: You may receive a "This operation has been canceled due to restrictions in effect on this computer" error message when you try to open the Internet Options dialog box in Internet Explorer 6
WindowsXP-KB894179-x86-ENU.EXE
TEMP\SP2QFE\shdocvw.dll
1 File(s) copied
0 File(s) copied

Software update 898461 installs a permanent copy of the Package Installer for Windows version 6.1.22.4
WindowsXP-KB898461-x86-ENU.exe
0 File(s) copied

The embedded resource version of the LIP MUI files is incorrect in Windows XP Starter Edition
WindowsXP-KB913808-x86-ENU.exe
0 File(s) copied

i may have to take these out or would this be script related issue? newwink.gif

incidentally, i noticed that 60615a was a bit smaller in file size (144 as compared to 145 in earlier vers) ... moreover, the slipstreaming time went down to 30-31mins again for me ... just like what i mentioned in my embarrassing post earlier, it used to last as long as 40+ mins ... considering i even added the newer updates using 60615a ...

i just hope this post is not yet too late knowing that 60616a is already out ... (which i already downloaded) newwink.gif

thanks!

This post has been edited by Kiki Burgh: Jun 16 2006, 05:26 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tomcat76
post Jun 16 2006, 07:53 PM
Post #687


MSFN Junkie
Group Icon

Group: Software Developers
Posts: 3171
Joined: 8-August 05
From: Flanders, Belgium
Member No.: 68008
OS: 2000
Country Flag


Huh, what? I've never seen this before.... unsure.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glentium
post Jun 17 2006, 01:49 AM
Post #688


SQL DBA
**

Group: Members
Posts: 183
Joined: 28-July 05
Member No.: 66411
Country Flag


Question:
Is it possible to add a feature in HFSLIP to ignore MAKENOISO in HFANSWER.INI if in MAKEISO mode?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tomcat76
post Jun 17 2006, 07:21 AM
Post #689


MSFN Junkie
Group Icon

Group: Software Developers
Posts: 3171
Joined: 8-August 05
From: Flanders, Belgium
Member No.: 68008
OS: 2000
Country Flag


The "MAKENOISO" feature was introduced in 13a and your suggestion (Super-Magician's suggestion, actually) was implemented in 13b... So no need to implement it again... smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Super-Magician
post Jun 17 2006, 07:33 AM
Post #690


Friend of MSFN
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 969
Joined: 15-January 06
Member No.: 85355
OS: Vista Ultimate x86
Country Flag


QUOTE
i just hope this post is not yet too late knowing that 60616a is already out
We're already up to 60616b now smile.gif.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glentium
post Jun 17 2006, 08:39 AM
Post #691


SQL DBA
**

Group: Members
Posts: 183
Joined: 28-July 05
Member No.: 66411
Country Flag


Oh, I'm still using 60612a... then the next time I logged in it's already 60616b! smile.gif But I already saw the MAKENOISO feature in 60612a...

Thanks for that feature anyway. Very much appreciated. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tomcat76
post Jun 17 2006, 08:29 PM
Post #692


MSFN Junkie
Group Icon

Group: Software Developers
Posts: 3171
Joined: 8-August 05
From: Flanders, Belgium
Member No.: 68008
OS: 2000
Country Flag


60617b is "the RC", people. If no new problems have been introduced over 60528, this will be released as the new final on Sunday evening. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glentium
post Jun 18 2006, 12:36 AM
Post #693


SQL DBA
**

Group: Members
Posts: 183
Joined: 28-July 05
Member No.: 66411
Country Flag


So I tried 60617b with INSTALLRC=1 and WINNTUPG folder present: an error message popped out at T-13 telling me that NETMAP.INF was not found, so I had to press OK, then another dialog box saying the "Windows XP Setup cannot continue" (something like that) and I had to click 'Finished...'
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kiki Burgh
post Jun 18 2006, 02:31 AM
Post #694


MSFN Expert
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1182
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Manila, Philippines
Member No.: 84520
OS: XP Pro x86
Country Flag


QUOTE (Tomcat76 @ Jun 17 2006, 09:53 AM) *
Huh, what? I've never seen this before.... unsure.gif
hi TC!
these were basically like what i posted before ... pls don't mind the headers (i just inserted those on top of the real messages) ... it's the same for the others ...
my apologies for the confusion ... smile.gif

A component that runs in the same process as the Windows Time service is stopped or is disabled unexpectedly in Windows XP ---> this is what i inserted
WindowsXP-KB888432-x86-ENU.EXE ---> HFSLIP shows the following lines
TEMP\SP2QFE\w32time.dll
1 File(s) copied
0 File(s) copied

Super-Magician ... i already downloaded the latest newwink.gif

thanks!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tomcat76
post Jun 18 2006, 08:48 AM
Post #695


MSFN Junkie
Group Icon

Group: Software Developers
Posts: 3171
Joined: 8-August 05
From: Flanders, Belgium
Member No.: 68008
OS: 2000
Country Flag



@Kiki: I already explained where the "0 File(s) copied" comes from....


QUOTE (glentium @ Jun 18 2006, 08:36 AM) *
So I tried 60617b with INSTALLRC=1 and WINNTUPG folder present: an error message popped out at T-13 telling me that NETMAP.INF was not found, so I had to press OK, then another dialog box saying the "Windows XP Setup cannot continue" (something like that) and I had to click 'Finished...'
The only reasons I can think of:
1) You don't have NETMAP.INF in WINNTUPG
2) WINNTUPG is not in the right place (it should be in I386)
3) You have an I386 folder in the root of a local partition (eg, C:\), and there is no NETMAP.INF in there

HFSLIP instructs Windows to execute the standard installation command, but with the /unattend switch added to it to make it silent.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tommyp
post Jun 18 2006, 09:43 AM
Post #696


MSFN Expert
Group Icon

Group: Software Developers
Posts: 1467
Joined: 9-January 04
Member No.: 12184
OS: none
Country Flag


QUOTE (Tomcat76 @ Jun 17 2006, 09:29 PM) *
60617b is "the RC", people. If no new problems have been introduced over 60528, this will be released as the new final on Sunday evening. smile.gif


T - Please allow a few more days for others to test and report back. Sit back, don't code, relax and wait for the population's feedback. Once all is fine, then go for it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Camarade_Tux
post Jun 18 2006, 12:54 PM
Post #697


MSFN Addict
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 1760
Joined: 22-May 05
From: Paris
Member No.: 57090
OS: none
Country Flag


smile.gif

French XP SP1a reports, Sir! smile.gif

QUOTE
Patch NOT Installed MS04-024 Q839645
The registry key
**Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet
Settings\ZoneMap\ProtocolDefaults\shell** does not exist. It is
required for this patch to be considered installed.
This does the trick:
CODE
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\ZoneMap\ProtocolDefaults]
"shell"=dword:00000000




Next:

QUOTE
Patch NOT Installed MS06-011 Q914798
The registry key **SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Updates\Windows
XP\SP2\KB914798** should have a value of 2. It has a value of 1.


Solution:
CODE
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Updates\Windows XP\SP2\KB914798]
"Installed"=dword:00000002





This one is a problem:

QUOTE
Patch NOT Installed MS06-021 Q916281
File C:\WIN\system32\browseui.dll has a file version [6.0.2800.1106]that is less than what is expected [6.0.2800.1692].




And now files greater than expected:

QUOTE
Warning MS05-051 Q902400
File C:\WIN\system32\txflog.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64]that is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File
C:\WIN\system32\rpcss.dll has a file version [5.1.2600.1801] that is
greater than what is expected [5.1.2600.1720]. - File
C:\WIN\system32\olecnv32.dll has a file version [5.1.2600.1801] that
is greater than what is expected [5.1.2600.1720]. - File
C:\WIN\system32\olecli32.dll has a file version [5.1.2600.1801] that
is greater than what is expected [5.1.2600.1720]. - File
C:\WIN\system32\ole32.dll has a file version [5.1.2600.1801] that is
greater than what is expected [5.1.2600.1720]. - File
C:\WIN\system32\es.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64] that is
greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File
C:\WIN\system32\comuid.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64] that
is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File
C:\WIN\system32\comsvcs.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64]
that is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File
C:\WIN\system32\comrepl.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64]
that is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File
C:\WIN\system32\com\comadmin.dll has a file version
[2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected
[2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\colbact.dll has a file
version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected
[2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\clbcatq.dll has a file
version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected
[2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\clbcatex.dll has a file
version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected
[2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\catsrvut.dll has a file
version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected
[2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\catsrv.dll has a file
version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected
[2001.12.4414.62].


* INTERNET EXPLORER 6 SP1

Warning MS05-044 Q905495
File C:\WIN\system32\msieftp.dll has a file version [6.0.2800.1724]
that is greater than what is expected [5.50.4956.500].
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tomcat76
post Jun 18 2006, 03:43 PM
Post #698


MSFN Junkie
Group Icon

Group: Software Developers
Posts: 3171
Joined: 8-August 05
From: Flanders, Belgium
Member No.: 68008
OS: 2000
Country Flag


@Camarade_Tux:

#1 is odd. HFSLIP copies the installation INF from the hotfix package, and it contains the registry entry you need. So it's strange that the key isn't created. This is the relevant line:

HKLM,"Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\ZoneMap\ProtocolDefaults","shell",0x10001,0x0

It could be that the "0x0" makes it fail but I'm not sure.


#2 is a problem. This hotfix doesn't contain any updated binaries and the installation INF has a name (update_SP1QFE.inf) which is normally associated with an installation folder called SP1QFE which isn't present. These hotfixes are given special treatment but for some reason this fails. The installation INF (which contains the necessary info) is not handled (or at least doesn't end up in SOURCESS\I386). I also see this installation INF is doing some special stuff which is beyond the scope of a "default" install. I'm going to have it installed from SVCPACK but not before I found out why the INF is not processed for such hotfixes.


I still need to check #3.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tomcat76
post Jun 18 2006, 04:55 PM
Post #699


MSFN Junkie
Group Icon

Group: Software Developers
Posts: 3171
Joined: 8-August 05
From: Flanders, Belgium
Member No.: 68008
OS: 2000
Country Flag


@Camarade_Tux:

#1... The key is being inserted if you use HFSLIP 60618a. I'm still wondering why it fails. Do you have this key at least:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Hotfix\KB839645

That's the other reg key created by the hotfix.


#2... Heh. It looks like HFSLIP already puts this hotfix in SVCPACK. Where are my thoughts?
HFSLIP lets this hotfix install itself so there's nothing that can be done (at least not easily). If I just insert a reg key from HFSLIPWU.INF it will be overwritten when the hotfix installs. It's strange that HFNetChk complains about something that the hotfix does...

#3... Fixed. The IE6 cumulative updates for XPSP1 need the RTMQFE binary versions. I forgot to update HFSLIP for the new cumulative update.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
the_guy
post Jun 18 2006, 06:23 PM
Post #700


Creator of the Windows ME Service Pack
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 899
Joined: 15-July 05
Member No.: 64572
Country Flag


From the browseui.dll issue, it appears browseui.dll wouldn't copy over from the hotfix to the sourcess folder.

the_guy
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Google Frontpage Forums Unattended CD/DVD Guide

112 Pages V  « < 33 34 35 36 37 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 10:33 PM
All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
MSFN is not affiliated with Microsoft
Copyright © 2001-2009 msfn.org
Privacy Policy