![]() ![]() |
Jul 27 2007, 12:52 AM Post
#1741 | |
| Newbie Group: Members Posts: 11 Joined: 14-December 06 Member No.: 118486 |
message deleted by mod so we can keep this on topic.
|
| | |
Jul 27 2007, 08:15 PM Post
#1742 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 | hmmmm.. tested 1.6.2rc1 There's a new roots update for XP/2K3.
WU claims roots update is not installed.. :s |
| | |
Jul 30 2007, 06:14 AM Post
#1743 | |
| The voices made me do it! ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 308 Joined: 25-March 04 Member No.: 16582 OS: Windows 7 x64 | There's a new roots update for XP/2K3. Ah yes, that explains it.. tested rc2.. no problems. This post has been edited by Glowy: Jul 30 2007, 06:15 AM |
| | |
Jul 30 2007, 10:47 PM Post
#1744 | |
| An HFSLIP Guy Group: Software Developers Posts: 914 Joined: 16-July 04 From: About 3 hours from TommyP Member No.: 24731 OS: none | Windows setup doesn't like to see a modified LAYOUT.INF. System File Protection needs to be modfied/disabled for this which is what I don't want HFSLIP to do. TommyP may have a different take on this but I won't do it. I'm sorry. BTW, it has nothing to do with SFC. Here is the deal with this file. I hadn't had my coffee so I made like 5 posts explaining it. Here is the deal with LAYOUT BTW, hi all! Long time no see, etc etc. |
| | |
Jul 31 2007, 05:51 AM Post
#1745 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
Interesting... Thanks.
|
| | |
Sep 26 2007, 12:22 PM Post
#1746 | |
| Junior ![]() Group: Members Posts: 66 Joined: 11-July 05 Member No.: 64020 |
Cross posting this one. I posted to main thread by accident..... Is it me or is something wrong in SVCPACK.inf? Using 1.6.3rc1 (also same with 70814a): CODE [SetupHotfixesToRun] HFSLIP.CMD 0_RogueSpearsRuntimesCF.exe oemscan.exe VMwareTools.exe HFSLIP.CMD I'm also attempting to track down an issue where permissions are being changed on "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\policies". Could HFSLIP be the culprit? I'm not pointing fingers yet, I am still backtracking to get a good build first. Only changes that come to mind are versions of HFSLIP and versions of RogueSpear's runtimes (RogueSpearsRuntimesCF & RogueSpearsRuntimesPart2) used. AND OF COURSE any additional MS Hotfixes that I added. |
| | |
Sep 26 2007, 03:22 PM Post
#1747 | |
| Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 367 Joined: 4-May 05 From: NJ, USA Member No.: 54728 OS: Windows 7 x64 | Cross posting this one. I posted to main thread by accident..... Is it me or is something wrong in SVCPACK.inf? Using 1.6.3rc1 (also same with 70814a): CODE [SetupHotfixesToRun] HFSLIP.CMD 0_RogueSpearsRuntimesCF.exe oemscan.exe VMwareTools.exe HFSLIP.CMD I'm also attempting to track down an issue where permissions are being changed on "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\policies". Could HFSLIP be the culprit? I'm not pointing fingers yet, I am still backtracking to get a good build first. Only changes that come to mind are versions of HFSLIP and versions of RogueSpear's runtimes (RogueSpearsRuntimesCF & RogueSpearsRuntimesPart2) used. AND OF COURSE any additional MS Hotfixes that I added. Take a look at the contents of HFSLIP.CMD. In mine, I've got this line: "IF EXIST %SYSTEMROOT%\HFSLIP.TMP GOTO :PART2", which indicates that the script is supposed to be run at least once already. I think what you're seeing is normal. Also, even though I know this issue has been addressed to death, but having underscores in addon names could be causing problems. I myself use RogueSpears' runtimes, and haven't had any problems in the local policy settings. Strange. |
| | |
Sep 30 2007, 09:44 AM Post
#1748 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
@NtegrA If you're referring to the two instances of HFSLIP.CMD... that's intentional. It's the cleanest way to satisfy several requests (order of installation, .NET before MSI installers, etc.). I've observed the same permissions problem recently. It may have to do with the key that HFSLIP is adding for LegitCheckControl.dll on Windows XP SP2 but I need to test that. Thanks for posting this. |
| | |
Oct 1 2007, 06:58 AM Post
#1749 | |
| Junior ![]() Group: Members Posts: 66 Joined: 11-July 05 Member No.: 64020 | @NtegrA If you're referring to the two instances of HFSLIP.CMD... that's intentional. It's the cleanest way to satisfy several requests (order of installation, .NET before MSI installers, etc.). I've observed the same permissions problem recently. It may have to do with the key that HFSLIP is adding for LegitCheckControl.dll on Windows XP SP2 but I need to test that. Thanks for posting this. Excellent! On both counts. I had widdled down to not using any .net stuff to see where I was. Last run through no go. The last version I believe was successful for me (I should know today), was either 1.6.2 or 70616b or 70812a. |
| | |
Oct 1 2007, 10:16 AM Post
#1750 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
Don't bother; it was the LegitCheckControl.dll registry key. Or better: HFSLIP 1.6.0 and newer adding it into the registry from a registry hive during the first Windows setup stage. Version 1.6.3 fixes this problem by adding it into the registry at T-13 as in version 1.5.0 and earlier.
|
| | |
Oct 2 2007, 06:21 AM Post
#1751 | |
| Junior ![]() Group: Members Posts: 66 Joined: 11-July 05 Member No.: 64020 | Don't bother; it was the LegitCheckControl.dll registry key. Or better: HFSLIP 1.6.0 and newer adding it into the registry from a registry hive during the first Windows setup stage. Version 1.6.3 fixes this problem by adding it into the registry at T-13 as in version 1.5.0 and earlier. heh. Will try 1.6.3 right now and report back |
| | |
Oct 2 2007, 02:58 PM Post
#1752 | |
| Creator of the Windows ME Service Pack ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 899 Joined: 15-July 05 Member No.: 64572 |
The date in the main post is wrong. It says July 30th, when it should say October 1. the_guy |
| | |
Oct 2 2007, 06:32 PM Post
#1753 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
Heh... It took me half an hour to figure out what you meant. I was thinking of "main thread" and just couldn't find it... |
| | |
Oct 3 2007, 06:23 AM Post
#1754 | |
| Junior ![]() Group: Members Posts: 66 Joined: 11-July 05 Member No.: 64020 |
Happy to report 1.6.3 is working and all is right with the world once more (yeah right!) Thanks This post has been edited by NtegrA: Oct 3 2007, 06:24 AM |
| | |
Oct 6 2007, 09:54 AM Post
#1755 | |
| Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 6-October 07 Member No.: 157355 OS: XP Pro x86 |
Question: Is there support for the latest version of Internet Explorer 7 (the version without WGA; version 7.0.5730.13) in the latest version of HFSLIP? Question 2: In wich folder do i have to place the roots update package? in HF? |
| | |
Oct 6 2007, 10:56 AM Post
#1756 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
A new test release to support the new IE7 installer is in the making. I'm now testing in a VM. The roots update goes in the HF folder, yes. |
| | |
Oct 6 2007, 12:18 PM Post
#1757 | |
| Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 6-October 07 Member No.: 157355 OS: XP Pro x86 | |
| | |
Oct 6 2007, 01:32 PM Post
#1758 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
How 'bout now? |
| | |
Oct 7 2007, 03:32 AM Post
#1759 | |
| Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 6-October 07 Member No.: 157355 OS: XP Pro x86 | |
| | |
Oct 7 2007, 05:59 AM Post
#1760 | |
| MSFN Junkie Group: Software Developers Posts: 3171 Joined: 8-August 05 From: Flanders, Belgium Member No.: 68008 OS: 2000 |
I was talking about a test release. Please check the first post in this thread |
| | |
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 07:10 PM |