![]() ![]() |
May 4 2009, 05:46 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
xpize / Vize Project Lead Group: Normal Sponsors Posts: 430 Joined: 14-June 06 From: UK Member No.: 98900 OS: XP Pro x64
|
Here comes along xpize 5. The first xpize with full SP3 compatibility (actually, it only supports SP3. So those of you on SP1 and SP2 had better upgrade).
This beta is the first (almost) feature complete release that includes almost everything XPize 4.7 does with a few notable exceptions (but there are a few things in this release that aren't in 4.7). There's also a large chunk that's missing from the final release later this spring or summer:
I've also made a youtube video showing how relatively painless the installation process is. Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOZYWBV_s9Q Also, news on the Vize front: whilst I have three Windows Server 2008 x64 boxes churning away (one of which serves the xpize and Vize websites) I don't have any non-VM Vista environments to develop Vize 2 against. If anyone would like to assist me with developing Vize it would be greatly appreciated. Downloads: Take care, David This post has been edited by W3bbo: May 4 2009, 06:38 PM |
|
|
|
May 4 2009, 06:04 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Banned Members ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1676 Joined: 6-June 06 From: Honduras Member No.: 98200 OS: Windows 7 x86
|
i386 patching yay
|
|
|
|
May 4 2009, 06:38 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 4-December 08 Member No.: 221667 OS: XP Home
|
thanx a lot. install w/o problem. i think i would be good if u add in release of XPize some thin styles 4 netbook support.
This post has been edited by hood: May 4 2009, 06:40 PM |
|
|
|
May 4 2009, 06:50 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
xpize / Vize Project Lead Group: Normal Sponsors Posts: 430 Joined: 14-June 06 From: UK Member No.: 98900 OS: XP Pro x64
|
thanx a lot. install w/o problem. i think i would be good if u add in release of XPize some thin styles 4 netbook support. What's that? An installation of mine went by without problems? I think you're in the wrong parallel universe, hood. People complain about my software erasing their harddrives and sacrificing their kittens to the elder-god Cthulhu almost every day via the contact form on my website. This post has been edited by W3bbo: May 4 2009, 06:50 PM |
|
|
|
May 4 2009, 06:59 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Banned Members ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1676 Joined: 6-June 06 From: Honduras Member No.: 98200 OS: Windows 7 x86
|
Can I make a request?
Add the msiexec.exe icon to msi.dll to update this icon ![]() Also missed these bitmaps in shell32.dll
|
|
|
|
May 4 2009, 07:08 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 29 Joined: 15-January 08 Member No.: 171618 OS: Windows 7 x86
|
Thanks,
Was waiting for this release. |
|
|
|
May 4 2009, 07:10 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 436 Joined: 28-January 04 From: Shimla-India Member No.: 13315
|
Wonderful! Thanks.
|
|
|
|
May 4 2009, 09:58 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 4-December 08 Member No.: 221667 OS: XP Home
|
i have a BSOD 2 times after install (((
thanx a lot. install w/o problem. i think i would be good if u add in release of XPize some thin styles 4 netbook support. What's that? An installation of mine went by without problems? I think you're in the wrong parallel universe, hood. People complain about my software erasing their harddrives and sacrificing their kittens to the elder-god Cthulhu almost every day via the contact form on my website. yeah i mean that - without problems. t think that people that complain u have wrong pair of hand in they body and sick state of mind. btw thanx great Cthulhu ) This post has been edited by hood: May 4 2009, 10:14 PM |
|
|
|
May 5 2009, 03:05 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 16-November 04 Member No.: 36602 |
|
|
|
|
May 5 2009, 08:52 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
xpize / Vize Project Lead Group: Normal Sponsors Posts: 430 Joined: 14-June 06 From: UK Member No.: 98900 OS: XP Pro x64
|
Also missed these bitmaps in shell32.dll ![]() Yes i can confirm that too. For the rest it's very good! Thank you for the work I'll need to look into that. Can you confirm the bitmap is in shell32? What's the Install Language of your OS? |
|
|
|
May 5 2009, 08:59 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 119 Joined: 27-May 07 From: Albino, BG Member No.: 140748 OS: Windows 7 x86
|
Nice, downloaded and installed a few hours ago.
All seems to work properly. My first impression is absolutely positive! Nice work! |
|
|
|
May 5 2009, 09:01 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Group: Banned Members ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1676 Joined: 6-June 06 From: Honduras Member No.: 98200 OS: Windows 7 x86
|
|
|
|
|
May 5 2009, 11:51 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
xpize / Vize Project Lead Group: Normal Sponsors Posts: 430 Joined: 14-June 06 From: UK Member No.: 98900 OS: XP Pro x64
|
My install language is Spanish and the names of my bitmaps in shell32.dll (v6.0.2900.5753 - KB960253) are: CODE 14351.bmp 14353.bmp 14354.bmp 14355.bmp 14356.bmp BTW how about doing some .scr files like I requested here? Hmm, I think I missed those bitmaps out (whoops), but can you confirm that the Shutdown selection screen has the new background image? As for those *.scr icons, I'll look into it, but looks doable. |
|
|
|
May 5 2009, 01:37 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Group: Banned Members ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1676 Joined: 6-June 06 From: Honduras Member No.: 98200 OS: Windows 7 x86
|
msgina.dll bitmaps (shutdown dialog) is fine, only the shell32.dll bitmaps (wait dialog and logoff dialog) are the problem
This post has been edited by ricktendo64: May 5 2009, 01:38 PM |
|
|
|
May 5 2009, 02:34 PM
Post
#15
|
|
|
xpize / Vize Project Lead Group: Normal Sponsors Posts: 430 Joined: 14-June 06 From: UK Member No.: 98900 OS: XP Pro x64
|
msgina.dll bitmaps (shutdown dialog) is fine, only the shell32.dll bitmaps (wait dialog and logoff dialog) are the problem Gotcha. I'll see if I can come out with a later release this month. It won't be the final release but it'll be close.... in terms of resource-related features. Implementing I386 and Uninstallation support will be a long coding job. On the technical side, I think I'll copy XPero's approach of manually Shell()-invoking the expand and makecab executables included in Windows since there aren't any fully managed CAB libraries furthermore: why fix something that isn't broken? Implementing uninstallation may or may not be trivial, it depends. Implementing a backup procedure is easy, but I can't implement it until I know how I'll restore the system state afterwards. Nonetheless, spread the word around |
|
|
|
May 6 2009, 08:12 PM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 23-July 07 Member No.: 147746 OS: 98SE
|
Looking forward to the offical XPize 5 release. Just wondering if it could be possible to update the Log Off & Turn Off Computer icons in the start menu under "Windows Classic Style"? See attached image.
Start_Menu_in_Windows_Classic_Style.JPG ( 29.89K )
Number of downloads: 15 |
|
|
|
May 6 2009, 08:31 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
xpize / Vize Project Lead Group: Normal Sponsors Posts: 430 Joined: 14-June 06 From: UK Member No.: 98900 OS: XP Pro x64
|
Looking forward to the offical XPize 5 release. Just wondering if it could be possible to update the Log Off & Turn Off Computer icons in the start menu under "Windows Classic Style"? See attached image. Hmm, that's a tricky one. The images for those buttons are resources 7010 and 7011 in explorer.exe and those are replaced by xpize 5 Beta 2. Can you fire up Resourcer and open up explorer.exe and tell me of the state of bitmaps 7010 and 7011? thanks |
|
|
|
May 6 2009, 09:01 PM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 23-July 07 Member No.: 147746 OS: 98SE
|
Never mind. I was in the process of manipulating files and I guess I goobered it up. I was using the standard WinXP style at the time. I switched it to Windows Classic style, reran XPize and all is good. I blame myself for this one. Thanks for the rapid response.
Any chance of updating the Windows Defender icons to the green forward/back arrow buttons as was in XPize Darkside or do I still have a problem on my end? Thanks again. |
|
|
|
May 7 2009, 06:05 AM
Post
#19
|
|
|
xpize / Vize Project Lead Group: Normal Sponsors Posts: 430 Joined: 14-June 06 From: UK Member No.: 98900 OS: XP Pro x64
|
Any chance of updating the Windows Defender icons to the green forward/back arrow buttons as was in XPize Darkside or do I still have a problem on my end? XPize Darkside (made by Zedox, not XPero nor me) patches some more files not present in vanilla XPize 4.x. Seeming as Zedox has done all the hard work for me I can easily include it in xpize 5. Zedox hasn't updated XPize Darkside since 2007, I'll email him and ask him if I can include his stuff in xpize 5 (not that I'd need permission: most of the changes he made were XPero's "MCE Blue"-themed bitmaps replaced with black ones which is nothing I can't do myself right now, but it would be rendering his product obsolete I've long been planning to combine the Luna Element and Luna Blue XPize "mod" resources with the main product, but adding the black MCE theme (aka Darkside) would push up the size of the download by at least another 7MB or so. For those of you on broadband this isn't an issue, but I've got my own bandwidth bills to pay[1] and there are a people still on dial-up where an extra 7MB means another 40 minutes downloading. [1]xpize.net consumes about 70GB a month since I removed the links to mirrors (which were all broken) and self-hosted the files. There were 28,885 requests for XPize47F1.exe (XPize 4.7 Full, Release 1) in April 2009. But it only consumed about 44GB which means there were a maximum of 5,400 full downloads; this means roughly 18% of people who started a download actually finished it. I don't have any statistics on how many people completed an installation. I'm tempted to add a reporting feature to Anolis Installer where it would send a post-installation report to the author of a package whenever it was installed or if the installation was cancelled or failed. There are privacy implications (well, the user's IP address would be revealed) but there are a large number of people who instinctively click "Do not send information" regardless so I'd have to bury the option away somewhere, but then I'd get criticised for it. I'll have to choose my words wisely. This post has been edited by W3bbo: May 7 2009, 06:17 AM |
|
|
|
May 7 2009, 06:16 AM
Post
#20
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 4-December 08 Member No.: 221667 OS: XP Home
|
but I've got my own bandwidth bills to pay and there are a people still on dial-up where an extra 7MB means another 40 minutes downloading. sorry for offtop but... in present days in UK people still using dial-up? unbelievable sad =( dear W3bbo. it's great that you're worried about reducing the size of the package. but many people download and install a much more extensive packages (for example Vistamizer etc. or MS Service Packs). This post has been edited by hood: May 7 2009, 06:23 AM |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 12:34 PM |