Aegis
Dec 12 2005, 08:00 PM
What's the best size for optimal hard drive performance? I couldn't understand this article that well:
http://www.overclockers.com.au/article.php?id=179581&P=2
big poppa pump
Dec 13 2005, 12:22 AM
16k/16k for benchmarks and regular day to day use.
64k/64k and 128k/128k for video editing and anything involving large files.
suryad
Dec 15 2005, 07:26 PM
So then the optimal would be 64k for benchmarks and for large files?
bledd
Dec 15 2005, 07:35 PM
hmm, interested in this too, will rebuild my raid once i get a final answer
big poppa pump
Dec 16 2005, 11:19 AM
Right now I am using 16k chunk size/16k stripe size for my windows . I have tried 16k/4k, 32k/32k, and also 64k/64k for my windows but I have come back to 16k/16k since I have found this to have the best performance. When I work with large video files I have them on a seperate raid 128k/128k partition.
suryad
Dec 16 2005, 01:08 PM
Hmm...I see what you are saying. Because I was gonna get 4 15k rpm 147 gig SCSI hard drives RAID 0 and stick the OS and app installs on that and also use it as a scratch disk for vdo editing. And then I was gonna have 2 x 500 gig 7200 rpm Seagates for storage and backups also in RAID 0 with a tape drive as a back up for the whole system. So since the vid files are going to be store on the 1 TB array but the manipulation probably done on the scratch disk array...maybe it would be better if I created another array based on a SCSI setup separate for scratchdisk purposes?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.