QUOTE (#rootworm @ May 15 2007, 04:09 AM)

i built my system years ago and i've always been able to boot from usb/flash drives.
Lucky you, because it doesn't work on my PIII-450. I don't expect it to either, but I do expect it to work on my more recent IBM Centrino ThinkPad - but it doesn't. I've tried with three different brands and types of drives, with different bootloaders and programs and I've given up, atleast on this system. Basically, I know that even if I create a proper bootable USB drive, there's absolutely no guarentee that it'll work on all systems. I'm an admin, and I often use bootable CDs/DVDs for various purposes across many systems. I thought the popularity and the fall in prices of flash drives would see me shifting entirely over to USB drives - but it never happened.
Ask Microsoft to give you a straightforward method to install XP from a bootable USB drive, and you'll get a straightforward answer - it's not possible.
QUOTE (#rootworm @ May 15 2007, 04:09 AM)

also, it takes me 5 minutes to install an app/game and then run it these days. back in DOS days i'd have to spend an hour making a custom config.sys and autoexec.bat for the stuff i wanted to run depending on if they used EMS or not and how much conventional memory they demanded. it sucked.
I guess I was luckier back then

. I know of the dreaded EMS/HIMEM/TSR problems but it was never really a big issue for me - all I needed to do was pick the right floppy disk and boot from it. Eventually I learned enough to modify my config.sys so that I had choices of whether to use a memory manager or not, if so, which one to use, which BLASTER and STACKS settings, and so on. I just had to spend a couple of mins going through the manual of a game to find out the best settings.
These days, games come on multiple CDs or even multiple DVDs (eg: FSX). Did you try installing NFS Carbon or Flight Simulator X? I assure you, it takes much more than than 5 minutes. Even if I have to install an older game like Diablo II (which requires 4 CDs) I'd have to spend a considerable amount of time. But back then, the only installation that was required was extracting from the archive which would take max about a couple of mins.
Ok, so even if you do not consider the installation time, I still require an equal amount of time, if not more, to tweak the resolution, AntiAliasing, Anisotropic filtering, etc with various permutations and combinations to get the game to work at the FPS and graphic detail I'm comfortable at. In the DOS days, you never had to mess with the display settings - you just had to decide between CGA/EGA/VGA and most games automatically chose the best that was available.
QUOTE (#rootworm @ May 15 2007, 04:09 AM)

so basically i disagree, i'm more productive now than i was back then.
So basically, I still stand by my earlier point. I was more productive back then.
I mean imagine this- if I had to type a document, the time it took for the PC to boot till WordPerfect was ready - less than a minute. Today, while the PC boot time is more or less the same, the OS takes quite a long time to boot. Even with hibernation, it isn't as fast as how it was in the DOS days.
QUOTE (#rootworm @ May 15 2007, 04:09 AM)

and i don't have to keep 3 different floppy sets of OS installation disks for when a random disk goes bad. (yah, remember that?)
Yes, I do remember that. :/ I used to treat those disks more preciously than gold. I packed them with silica gel in airtight boxes and and made sure it was in a cool, dry, dark place. But I'd still end up corrupting a few - I think they get demagnetized over a period of time.

.
But once again, I never had much problems with the OS itself, save a few instances of boot sector virii, which was easily solved by FDISK /MBR and SYS C: . If the rest of the OS files also got corrupted, I'd restore them from my backup archive on the HDD itself. Basically, I never had to do a full format+reinstall.