Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Church website. Opinions needed and suggestions
MSFN Forums > Coding, Scripting and Servers > Web Development (HTML, Java, PHP, ASP, XML, etc.)

   
Google Internet Forums Unattended CD/DVD Guide
hougtimo
Hi,

I have been commissioned to create a website for my Church. You can see the old site at : Here

The site I have been working on is currently hosted Here and will eventually be transferred to the "proper" church domain.

I am looking for opinions on the design of the site and the information contained within it. Any suggestions are welcome, as well as constructive critism

Thanks

HougTimo
ripken204
very nice! i love how that looks.
IcemanND
Looks nice, much better than the original.

Two things I noticed, the scrolling marquee on the home page either need to be longer, or needs to continuously scroll rather then reset to the beginning when the end is reached. And the slideshow brought up a missing link, this may have been due to the site being worked on but I thought I would mention it.
tain
Great work! Simple, classic and understated. Perfect for a church site.
hougtimo
QUOTE (IcemanND @ Jun 19 2007, 03:34 PM) *
Looks nice, much better than the original.

Two things I noticed, the scrolling marquee on the home page either need to be longer, or needs to continuously scroll rather then reset to the beginning when the end is reached. And the slideshow brought up a missing link, this may have been due to the site being worked on but I thought I would mention it.

Yeah, can you let me know what browser you are using? I know there is an issue with the scrooling marquee in Firefox which I am not sure how to fix ... (anyone have any ideas?)

Also I know about the link. We're currently re-writing the slideshow in Movie Maker, so it should be up soon. Maybe I should point that out on the site.

Thanks very much for all your comments biggrin.gif

Tim
IcemanND
FF 2.0.0.4.

Just llok at it in IE6, works much better there.
mau-yong
The newer version looks much better than the original yes.gif !

The thing that caught my eye however, is the line Holy Trinity Church is not responsible for the content of external websites on the Online Media Page. In my humble opinion, this is like telling me not to go to these sites, and a little more painful to the eyes. Try to consider to understate it a little bit, or since your background color is white, use a little more grey color or something less than black or #000000 - #C0C0C0 would be nice.
hougtimo
QUOTE (mau-yong @ Jun 20 2007, 12:00 AM) *
The newer version looks much better than the original yes.gif !

The thing that caught my eye however, is the line Holy Trinity Church is not responsible for the content of external websites on the Online Media Page. In my humble opinion, this is like telling me not to go to these sites, and a little more painful to the eyes. Try to consider to understate it a little bit, or since your background color is white, use a little more grey color or something less than black or #000000 - #C0C0C0 would be nice.

Thanks for that smile.gif I will certainly look into changing that smile.gif

thanks for your input!

HougTimo
Idontwantspam
My goodness! 56 errors! VALIDATE!!

OK then. Other than that, it looks pretty good, though I agree about having the marquee go all the way.
ripken204
haha, looks like he will need to get use to CSS.
tain
QUOTE (ripken204 @ Jun 20 2007, 12:11 PM) *
haha, looks like he will need to get use to CSS.
I see more (X)HTML errors than CSS errors.
ripken204
well its both of them. to validate you cant use all of those attributes inside of the tags.
TomcaT
The site has a nice look and feel to it, the only things I would change about the layout, is the main content area creates another set of scroll bars, even on my 19 inch monitor the main browser pages scrolls (1280 x1024), I feel having 2 sets of scrollbars is unneccessary as the user has to scroll anyway with the amount of content, so I would change the class .overflow in your CSS to this:

CODE
.overflow
{
width: 825px;
height: 619px;
}


Also the validation from W3C is worth doing.

Other than that you should be proud of your design. thumbup.gif

Edit... woke up this morning and thought you could get rid the overflow class completely and take the corresponding <div></div> tags out the html pages.
kooler
oh yeah looks great

very good job!!
hougtimo
QUOTE (ripken204 @ Jun 20 2007, 07:11 PM) *
haha, looks like he will need to get use to CSS.

Sorry but I'm new to web design, so instead of slide comments, how about how i can go about fixing them?
ripken204
QUOTE (hougtimo @ Jun 21 2007, 06:31 PM) *
QUOTE (ripken204 @ Jun 20 2007, 07:11 PM) *
haha, looks like he will need to get use to CSS.

Sorry but I'm new to web design, so instead of slide comments, how about how i can go about fixing them?

im not trying to be rude at all. instead of using attributes like bgcolor or tags like underline/bold, you will have to use CSS.
Idontwantspam
Apparently you must know at least some CSS, or at least some one does, because there's a link to a stylesheet. But none the less, I do agree that learning a bit more CSS would be a good idea. A good place to start, very useful, is w3schools. Click on CSS on the navbar at the left. Lots of good info.
iceangel89
ya , very good, nice although not validated well, it works for me.
tjhart85
Even an atheist agrees that the new site looks great (especially when compared to the original).

That scrolling is a little jerky though in FF 2.0.0.4.
I have no idea how to help.

I'm looking to get into CSS & PHP to redesign my works web page, so I know how daunting it can be when people yell that stuff is broken but won't help at all (not that anyone here fits that bill).

Keep up the good work.
Google Internet Forums Unattended CD/DVD Guide
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.