QUOTE (bearwindows @ Oct 14 2008, 01:23 AM)

QUOTE (PVU @ Oct 13 2008, 05:02 PM)

(although I can guess that maybe Intel took marching orders from Mr. Softie).
Dunno why support for
Windows 2000 Professional and
Windows 2000 Datacenter Server is not declared. But I see no difference between these editions of W2K, only different sofware packaging (client/server) and pricing, licensing. Here is a Intel Matrix Storage Manager log-file from
Windows 2000 Professional:
CODE
System Information
Kit Installed: 7.0.0.1020
Kit Install History: 7.0.0.1020
Shell Version: 7.0.0.1020
OS Name: Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional
OS Version: 5.0.2195 Service Pack 4 Build 2195
System Manufacturer: Intel Corporation
System Model: DQ963FX
Processor: IntelŪ PentiumŪ D CPU 3.00GHz
BIOS Version/Date: Intel Corp. MQ96510J.86A.1738.2008.0617.0002, 06/17/2008
Serial ATA Information
Intel Serial ATA Controller: Unknown Controller
Number of Serial ATA ports: 4
Driver Version: 7.0.0.1020
Serial ATA Plug-In Version: 7.0.0.1020
Language Resource Version of the Serial ATA Plug-In: File not found
ISDI Library Version: 7.0.0.1020
Hard Drive 0
Status: Normal
Device Port: 0
Device Port Location: Internal
Current Serial ATA Transfer Mode: Generation 2
Model: ST3320620AS
Firmware: 3.AAD
Native Command Queuing Support: Yes
Size: 298 GB
I'll gave you some other examples of such "commercial declared incompatibility":
1) Windows 2000 + Intel Chipset Graphics (945, 963, 965, 3 Series, 4 Series). There is no *official support* in this case. But the latest XP driver is working with W2K without problems. Install it through "Device Manager -> Update Driver..." Before installing this driver, as usual, install Intel's Chipsets INF Update.
2) Windows 2000 + ATI/AMD Radeon X300-X1950 Series Graphics (i.e. all pre-X2yyy Series). Use Catalyst driver version 7.4 from ATI/AMD site.
3) Windows NT 4.0 + ATI/AMD Radeon 9800-X300-X600 Series Graphics (i.e. all pre X1yyy series). Use one of drivers listed there:
http://forum.radeon.ru/viewtopic.php?p=401081#401081 .
4) Windows NT 4.0 + Intel Chipset Graphics (915, 945 Series). There is no *official support* in this case. But the Intel Embedded Graphics driver version 5.1 is working with NT4.
I can expand this list if I remember some more...

Yeah, I know. That has certainly been the case for that
7.4 ATI graphics driver for Win2K. I don't know all of the ins and outs of the core drivers, but it's worked. In that particular case, even though they don't advertise 2K support, there remained a
C2_44981.inf for Windows 2000.
As a side note, the last 7 series driver that ATI advertises for XP is 7.12. I'm not sure why...
Since the Intel SATA driver 7 worked for a version of Windows 2000, it would make sense that it would (or could easily) work for any version of 2K. The INF's don't place a restriction on the OS. But unlike the ATI 7.4 driver, there is no INF specifically labled for the OS.
Concerning the Intel Matrix Storage Manager log-file, I'm assuming that you post installed the full Intel Matrix Storage Manager after pre-installing the driver. That's bit surprising. I can see pre-installing the driver, but I'm surprised that the post install of the full storage manager worked. That's good news (assuming your BIOS and Board can handle it in the first place).
Fernando 1 is a pretty astute guy. I've worked with him before. His take that Windows 2000 really can't take advantage of the Intel AHCI (SATA) driver is interesting. On this point, I wonder if there really is a performance gain to be had using the SATA driver (as opposed to using just the base INF chipset driver) for Windows 2000.
It's also interesting that he indicates that the (latest) Intel ICH8/ICH9 SATA AHCI Controllers are not supported by any official Intel textmoding pre-install for XP. The "readme" files indicate that. He's modified the latest driver, but it looks like Mr. Softie is really pushing Vista. You got this above in your modified driver remarks.
Thanks