I go both ways on this one. I like fat exe's for small little utility programs, the kinds I can just throw in the system32 folder and call via command prompt whenever necessary. But for full-fledge programs like Photoshop, I like installers. Whats your preference?
Jono
Apr 8 2004, 05:09 PM
i would agree with you, the smaller utilitys should be 'fat exe's' and larger programs as installers
CuBie
Apr 8 2004, 05:25 PM
QUOTE (Jono @ Apr 8 2004, 05:09 PM)
i would agree with you, the smaller utilitys should be 'fat exe's' and larger programs as installers
Yep! I agree!
Doggie
Apr 9 2004, 03:13 AM
fat exe for me.. some installers even have the balls to get the installed files from the net to install.. rather one file downloaded so u dont need to be on the net all the time (56k person here )
Dude111
Oct 2 2008, 02:59 AM
I like EXE's that you download and they just run...
They dont screw up the registry (Are less likely to add entries) and they are much better!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.