Exactly, I believe in the US justice system just as I would the UK justice system and if it has found him not guilty then to me he is not guilty.
As for this guy:
QUOTE
Although I think he's guilty (waving a baby thro a window, holding hands with that kid, that's plain insane and stupid) and find it a **** same he's set free, I don't know the truth. Nobody does. So you can't say "he's innocent" or "he's guilty" just like that (especially like in the post above me, how teh *beep* would you know? tongue.gif). One thing's certain, it's over. I don't think we'll hear a lot from him again (glad, his last cd sucked smile.gif), so stop bickering. I'm friggin' glad the guy's face doesn't appear anymore in the papers and tv. biggrin.gif
What are you on? You can't assume he is guilty of molestation and paedophilia because of another totally unrelated.....and I believed unprosecuted incident? Yeh he shouldn't have dangled the baby off the balcony....but it doesn't make him any more of a paedophile than anyone else.....possibly less when you think about it

As for holding hands with a child....sorry? When was that made illegal? Holding someone's hand does not mean you want to have sex with them! It is much MORE a sign of platonic love in my eyes than sexual love anyway.
I'm glad you have no authority where the law is concerned because that is far from fair. You can say he is innocent, he has had a perfectly fair trial and been found so.
I don't particularly like the guy and I don't really wanna see his face all over TV.....quite frankly I find it quite scary

but that's irrelevant, because that's not a crime and so it isn't to be considered when condeming the poor guy.