N1K
Jan 13 2006, 05:18 AM
XPero
Jan 13 2006, 05:24 AM
I cant wait!!
Jeremy
Jan 13 2006, 05:56 AM
That guy's armor looks like it could withstand a nuclear blast.
N1K
Jan 13 2006, 06:11 AM
QUOTE (XPero @ Jan 13 2006, 12:24 PM)

I cant wait!!

Likevise mate, but my hardware is probably obsolete for this game
Check this out
QUOTE
UT2007 Hardware Requirements Reports suggest a pretty high benchmark to play the next Unreal Tournament. According to a German PC hardware magazine the minimum processor you'll need is a 2.8 GHz CPU.
Here are some of the details revealed:
Minimum: - 2.8GHz, 512MB RAM, Geforce 6
For high detail: - 3-4GHz, 1GB RAM, Nvidia 6800GT-Ultra or 7800GT-GTX SLI
- Dual-core Processor use: Multi-Threading is supported and should
- provide much better performance.
- 64 Bit version available with better textures
- Renderers: Shader-3.0, Fallback-Mode for Shader 2.0 maybe a DX8
- renderer.
- HDR: yes
- Physics: Novodex-Physik-Engine.
- Ageias PhysX Processor supported.
Source: Beyond Unreal
DigeratiPrime
Jan 13 2006, 11:41 AM
HOLY SH*T!!!
good comparison pic.
suryad
Jan 13 2006, 12:58 PM
This pic has been out for a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG time!
TravisO
Jan 13 2006, 01:10 PM
QUOTE (suryad @ Jan 13 2006, 12:58 PM)

This pic has been out for a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG time!
Perhaps, but I haven't seen it and it looks like nobody else that has posted here has either. Ok I've seen the picture of the guy but not the comparison shot.
I use to be a die-hard Unreal fan, unfortunately I'm sick of spending a small fortune on my PC keeping it gamer friendly and haven't upgraded since 2001 (ok I upgraded 512ram to 768ram but only because my wife and I use user switching in XP). A good video card alone costs as much as a gaming console, and then you still have to worry about CPU, RAM, HD and Mobo upgrades.
I'd love to play Unreal 2007, but I don't have any plans to upgrade my PC (XP1700) unless Vista forces me to. I'm a console gamer now
N1K
Jan 13 2006, 01:54 PM
QUOTE (travisowens @ Jan 13 2006, 08:10 PM)

I'd love to play Unreal 2007, but I don't have any plans to upgrade my PC (XP1700) unless Vista forces me to. I'm a console gamer now

My machine will fulfil minimal requirements of Unreal Tournament 2007, but I wouldn't like to play it on low detail, seems that I'll have to buy myself a new graphic card.
I have P4 3,2 GHz HT, 1GB of Kingston HyperX DDR400 RAM, GeForce 6600 GT. The good thing is that HT will be supported and should give a better performance.
Mocht4R
Jan 13 2006, 04:18 PM
Wow! Amazing graphics. Luckily im getting a new computer, and on top of that 512 mb ddr RAM. YESSS. I hope i will be able to play this game on full settings when i get my computer.
XPero
Jan 13 2006, 04:28 PM
I saw also the video...this UT will be amazing
suryad
Jan 13 2006, 04:31 PM
Yeah it is ridiculous the amount of money one needs to spend to keep up. Consoles are great for noobs I think but not for pure gamers. Consoles dont have the element of reality too much in them. For example Ravenshield was horrible on PS2. I also like the flexibility of a keyboard/mouse combination better. Also it goes without saying PC graphics are way better. Now the Cell setup is different however, if the reviews and the rumors are true of its capabilities. That machine will remain a badass console for a looooong time.
Mocht4R
Jan 13 2006, 11:47 PM
QUOTE (travisowens @ Jan 13 2006, 01:10 PM)

A good video card alone costs as much as a gaming console
Actually, you can get a decent video card for 100$ if you live where i live. 256 mb vid card for 70-90$ 128mb vid card for 50-60$.
ripken204
Jan 14 2006, 12:20 AM
QUOTE (bms @ Jan 14 2006, 12:47 AM)

QUOTE (travisowens @ Jan 13 2006, 01:10 PM)

A good video card alone costs as much as a gaming console
Actually, you can get a decent video card for 100$ if you live where i live. 256 mb vid card for 70-90$ 128mb vid card for 50-60$.
i think he is talking about the 7800gt like what i have. it will play all games on high settings and 8xAA 4xAF 1280x1024 and somehow FEAR can even go 16xAA 4xAF for me. last week i decided to try out my xbox again and wow do those graphics suck, not to mention im playing on a 20yr old tv! lol
Mocht4R
Jan 14 2006, 11:48 AM
SAPHIRE ATI RADEON 9600 PRO 256MB AGP
Thats what im talking about ripken. Its only 119$.
and this
SAPPHIRE 256MB DDR RADEON 9250 SE ATLANTIS
For only 89$
ripken204
Jan 14 2006, 12:41 PM
well just b/c its 256mb , it doesnt mean that is good. for todays games you need a minimum of a 6600gt. my 7800gt is the same price as an xbox360.
suryad
Jan 14 2006, 01:07 PM
What ripken said. There is no way the 9600 is going to run FEAR at playable graphics and framerates.
gentoobox
Jan 14 2006, 01:26 PM
any word on a Linux version yet ?
suryad
Jan 15 2006, 12:51 PM
Not that I know of.
CoRoNe
Jan 16 2006, 08:27 AM
QUOTE (suryad)

What ripken said. There is no way the 9600 is going to run FEAR at playable graphics and framerates.
Let alone UT2007. Hell, I even think my X800 XT will have a hard time render all this advanced stuff.
"UT2007 - what to expect"
> A new computer!
N1K
Jan 16 2006, 08:38 AM
QUOTE (CoRoNe @ Jan 16 2006, 03:27 PM)

"UT2007 - what to expect"
> A new computer!
True!
ripken204
Jan 16 2006, 10:18 AM
that card will be able to play it but prolly not on all high settings, no one will know for sure tho.
suryad
Jan 16 2006, 01:01 PM
Well I read that the UE3 engine was targetting only DX 9 class hardware from the oldes tot he latest greatest. So I think x800s should run decent maybe not at 1600 x 1200 with 16x af and 8 x aa but it will work.
Maleko
Jan 17 2006, 03:23 AM
that guy looks totally bad a**! I wanna see the Skarji!
suryad
Jan 17 2006, 01:19 PM
Yeah the rendering and the look on Malcolm's face in that pic should make his opponents think twice before taking him on!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.