Super-Magician
Jul 23 2006, 06:48 AM
the_guy
Jul 23 2006, 06:50 AM
The first one is for SP2 and SP1 if you didn't install DX9. The second one is for SP1 if you did install DX9.
the_guy
Super-Magician
Jul 23 2006, 07:33 AM
All right, thanks.
Super-Magician
Jul 23 2006, 02:13 PM
@Tomcat, another quick note: In the preface on your basic howto page, privileges is spelled with an extra 'd'.
Tomcat76
Jul 23 2006, 04:18 PM
Uh? Your browser's cache must be way behind, then. It was last updated on the 18th and "priviledges" is written "priviledges" in both the Preface and in Step 8.
Tomalak
Jul 23 2006, 04:24 PM
QUOTE (Tomcat76 @ Jul 23 2006, 02:46 PM)

Me neither. The German version is a year old too. I think Tomalak was referring to something else.
Sorry, my fault - shouldn't have said "new", just meant "newer" (than the original that came with SP2). Yes, I was really referring to the one year old KB898461.
Regards,
Tomalak
Super-Magician
Jul 23 2006, 04:40 PM
QUOTE (Tomcat76 @ Jul 23 2006, 06:18 PM)

Uh? Your browser's cache must be way behind, then. It was last updated on the 18th and "priviledges" is written "priviledges" in both the Preface and in Step 8.
I guess I should have made my point a little clearer

. I was trying to say that 'privileges' should not be spelled with a 'd'.

Oh, did anyone notice that for some reason you don't need to be logged in anymore to view this forum?
Tomcat76
Jul 23 2006, 07:13 PM
OK. Updated. Keep the corrections coming, but please don't do it in this thread. I'll start a new one.
Tomcat76
Jul 26 2006, 12:49 PM
OK. "HFEXPERT\PROGFILES" is ready for consumption, hehe. Let the reports roll in...
tommyp
Jul 26 2006, 04:04 PM
The program files will cause countless errors from users. I would strongly recommend to delete this section of code and not rebloat hfslip.
EDIT - TC informed me that he thoroughly tested this feature. Nevermind.
Tomcat76
Jul 29 2006, 09:20 AM
We're slowly heading for a new release. I don't intend to add any more to it in this round, so... let us know if something broke. Comments on the new HFEXPERT\PROGRAMFILES feature would be nice too...
Camarade_Tux
Jul 29 2006, 12:05 PM
I'll test these test release asap, I was busy.
I had to use hfslip this morning to make an XP SP2 CD. My first iso was bad because I used a CD with SP2 sent by Microsoft and the name of the pack was "XPSP2.EXE".
I then renamed it but I think it would be better if HFSlip recognized this too.
Thanks.
the_guy
Jul 29 2006, 12:16 PM
I'm going to agree.
Maybe modify the code for XPSP2 to
CODE
if exist xpsp2.exe goto slipsp
just an idea. It might be sending it to the wrong part though.
the_guy
Tomcat76
Jul 29 2006, 03:44 PM
The XPSP2 installer can be named xpsp2*.exe from now on if MS ships it like that. The old *835935* from the MS Download Center still works, of course.
wela
Jul 30 2006, 06:25 AM
Woooooow ....... alot of changes and new features. So, i´ll have to spend some time in the next future to see and to learn.
One Question i have before i start. Theres the need for me to copy one file during syssetup or during first logon in to %windir%. Please, how is the best way to do that???

Could hfslip help???
Thx for your answer.
tommyp
Jul 30 2006, 06:59 AM
wela - please refer to the HFEXPERT page for fine details. Short answer, create a folder structure alongside your hfslip cmd file: HFEXPERT\WIN. Place your file in that folder.
wela
Jul 30 2006, 09:35 AM
@tommyp. THX for the short answer. It helped.
Made a first test install with german Xpsp2 and the new feature Progfiles.
Works great.
Very good work guys!!!

Made a final install with new features. My son is happy, WU is happy, i am happy.
Kiki Burgh
Aug 3 2006, 07:50 AM
test release has been kinda quiet recently ...

... looks like all's fine
Tomcat76
Aug 3 2006, 02:20 PM
When you the least expect it...
I'm waiting for TommyP's results. Then we can release a new one.
Super-Magician
Aug 3 2006, 02:37 PM
What was wrong with fetching the boot image?
tommyp
Aug 3 2006, 02:41 PM
I forgot to report back. I had no issues with that last file you sent me. Sorry dudes.
Tomcat76
Aug 3 2006, 03:02 PM
QUOTE (Super-Magician @ Aug 3 2006, 10:37 PM)

What was wrong with fetching the boot image?
It didn't work for me -- neither in HFSLIP, nor in another program I'm currently working on. I actually never noticed this because I don't use HFSLIP to make an ISO. When I noticed the problem in that other program, I tested it in HFSLIP and it didn't work there either.
Super-Magician
Aug 3 2006, 05:56 PM
QUOTE (Tomcat76 @ Aug 3 2006, 05:02 PM)

It didn't work for me -- neither in HFSLIP, nor in another program I'm currently working on. I actually never noticed this because I don't use HFSLIP to make an ISO. When I noticed the problem in that other program, I tested it in HFSLIP and it didn't work there either.
I see. I wonder why no one reported that problem. Maybe not many people actually use the feature?
Tomcat76
Aug 3 2006, 07:13 PM
Or they did it once a couple of months ago. There's no need to create it again if you already have it.
Kiki Burgh
Aug 4 2006, 08:32 AM
ey ... kinda got lost there ...

i'll second what Super-Magician
QUOTE (Super-Magician @ Aug 4 2006, 04:37 AM)

What was wrong with fetching the boot image?
didn't notice this all along ... i always create an ISO via HFSLIP to test it with other ISO created by another app ... maybe because i don't touch anymore my HFTOOLS folder which has it there (actually there's a .bin & .img there ... probably because i used to have mkisofs & cdimage both in the folder) ...
ah ... just the same ... i was right

... a new final!
Tomcat76
Aug 4 2006, 11:13 AM
No wonder you never noticed... You already have a boot.bin file.
Move boot.bin out of the HFTOOLS folder and then use an older version of HFSLIP. It won't make a new boot.bin.
Kiki Burgh
Aug 7 2006, 07:13 AM
hi TC!
i actually exprimented on boot.bin & boot.img over the weekend ... with these files (and/or) in HFTOOLS folder ... no ISO was created ... no wonder the cmd file finished faster ... but when i took those 2 out with bbie & mkisofs still in HFTOOLS & leaving the original source CD in the drive, boot.bin was recreated & ISO was created as well ...

as for the presence of the boot.bin there, i have never removed since i 1st used HFSLIP

... i got curious because of the posts i read prior to taking my days-off from work
oh btw, this was using 60803 ... i'll ask related questions in the appropriate thread: ISO creation fails with 60803
Super-Magician
Aug 8 2006, 04:23 PM
*silent bump*
the_guy
Aug 8 2006, 05:21 PM
Suggestion for 917008: Remove the MUI files and just treat the rest like a normal hotfix. Is this possible, or not?
the_guy
Tomcat76
Aug 8 2006, 06:13 PM
I like that better.
Done.
Camarade_Tux
Aug 9 2006, 12:00 AM
Probably agree too.

edit : I knew I had something stupid to do :

^^
Camarade_Tux
Aug 9 2006, 01:01 AM
QUOTE (Camarade_Tux @ Jul 18 2006, 10:13 PM)

Installation can not continue:
Maybe (probably) because nlite has an option to recompress ASMS files; I had one bug with that option and this is only an option because it has been reported to sometimes cause bugs-Error:
SXS.DLL : syntax error in the manifest file or strategy file "D:\I386\asms\10\msft\windows\gdiplus\GDIPLUS.CA_ at line 0 (file non-empty)
-Error:
Installation failed : D:\I386\ASMS. Error message : Analysis error of the manifest file : invalid character has been found in the text content.
-Fatal Error:
One of the component Windows needs to continue installation program could not be installed.
(of course this is translated, and btw I'm a bit tired, it's so hot here nobody can sleep)
I'm going to try to try (not a mistake

) again, without nlite's ASMS RECOMPRESSION.
... again
I copied a working i386\ASMS over the buggy one and tried again.
... would have been better if I did not forget to recreate the iso/
edit: went ok, checking HFs.
edit2: I probably woke up too early... I forgot to add Hfs. I should probably go back to bed. :/
And VirtualConsole for Avedesk is working. However, it can be CPU hungry, especially with makecab.
Camarade_Tux
Aug 9 2006, 02:17 AM
Everything seems to be OK on XP SP1a.
I'll try to find what the problem with ASMS compression is.
Thanks a lot.
Tomcat76
Aug 9 2006, 04:21 AM
@Camarade...
What I find strange is that Windows complains about an error in a manifest file, but it names a catalog file instead. Are you sure that isn't a typo?
That folder contains:
gdiplus.cat
gdiplus.dll
gdiplus.man
The manifest file is gdiplus.man.
When reducing the source, does nLite also delete files from ASMS?
Camarade_Tux
Aug 9 2006, 05:02 AM
It has already happened.
nLite's help says ASMS recompression may cause bugs.
I don't know if it is hfslip's fault or not. I'll make some new tests soon. I only learnt makecab outputs a different file, depending on where the source file is stored!
This bug is also really funny : it complains about one file. You replace this file with a working one. Then it complains about another file. You replace that one with a working one too and it complains about a third file (the 3 files are in 10\....). And once you have replaced all files in the folder, it complains about "ASMS" folder itself.
I'll see if T-39/DetachedPrograms+Filemon is of any help.
edit: now installing a non-nlited iso.
Camarade_Tux
Aug 9 2006, 05:22 AM
Ok. In fact, this is a problem with hfslip (and I think I already had it last month, CPU is stable and this happened on more than 5 isos)
-> Filemon.
Kiki Burgh
Aug 9 2006, 06:42 AM
hi Camarade Tux!

try not to recompress ASMS ...
Super-Magician
Aug 9 2006, 06:52 AM
QUOTE (Kiki Burgh @ Aug 9 2006, 08:42 AM)

hi Camarade Tux!

try not to recompress ASMS ...
I second that! I wouldn't do too much experimentation with HFSLIP + nLite if I were you

.
Camarade_Tux
Aug 9 2006, 06:58 AM
I tried without nlite and I still got the error and I think hfslip cabs the files itself.
I'm slowly debugging that. Extracting files one by one. Hopefully, I don't have to go through the whole textmode part of setup.

edit : I had to extract the content of 4 folder to get this back.
Now, I wonder what the error is. I suspect it has something to do with compression method.
PS: T-39 is later on and filemon is now running : 260.000th entry in the log has been reached. :woot:
Err.... 300.000 entry I mean. No, 310.0000...
Camarade_Tux
Aug 9 2006, 08:09 AM
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT !
I finally got it, ... thanks to Tomcat.
The worst thing is he gave me the solution immediately : *.MAN files have to remain uncompressed. That's all.
No, I have to check if hflsip cabs this file on its own. :?
Camarade_Tux
Aug 9 2006, 08:21 AM
I can confirm the error is in hfslip.
Or at least in a hotfix : my man files are CABbed.
Tomcat76
Aug 9 2006, 10:12 AM
KB917008 for Win2K is not OK. I'll revert to HFSLIP_60808a once I get my computer running again (spilled coke on the keyboard... again!). I'll then try to figure out how to have it slipstreamed properly.
@Camarade: I'll check it out.
Tomcat76
Aug 9 2006, 12:17 PM
@Camarade: Try 60809a...
Camarade_Tux
Aug 10 2006, 01:30 AM
Workign, but why not compress everything except .man files ?
Have a look at
this page for ready-to-use implementation (thanks hp38quser).
Yzöwl
Aug 10 2006, 03:21 AM
QUOTE (Camarade_Tux @ Aug 10 2006, 07:30 AM)

Workign, but why not compress everything except .man files ?
Have a look at
this page for ready-to-use implementation (thanks hp38quser).

Correction for your link
this page
Correction for the code given
CODE
FOR /F "DELIMS=" %%I IN (
'DIR/B/A-D %LOCATION%^|FINDSTR/EVIL ".CAB .CMD .INI .MAN _"') DO (
MAKECAB /D CompressionMemory=
etc.
Camarade_Tux
Aug 10 2006, 03:46 AM
Thanks for your corrections.
I wonder how I ended up with "http://page" in my link. :?
And you're incredibly fluent with BATCH, much more than I will ever be.
And why "/EVIL" ? Is it just something like foobar ?
Tomcat76
Aug 10 2006, 10:57 AM
E = end of line
V = exclude
I = case insensitive
L = literal search
L is probably used so you can do without a backslash in front of the dots in these search strings.
I was thinking of having HFSLIP compress new ASMS files anyway but just exclude *.man files. But I don't know how nLite copes with a source of which some ASMS files are already cabbed and some not so I thought it safer to just leave all files uncompressed.
Tomcat76
Aug 10 2006, 01:04 PM
On second thought, I think it isn't such a good idea to compress the new files (except .man). Either you compress both old and new ASMS binaries, or neither. There's no point in just compressing the new ones as people who'd care would prefer to do them all so they'll use a different program for it anyway.
vci
Aug 10 2006, 02:11 PM
just wanted to say:
latest test release works fine, everything is beeing slipstreamed perfectly!
Camarade_Tux
Aug 11 2006, 02:00 AM
QUOTE (Tomcat76 @ Aug 10 2006, 09:04 PM)

On second thought, I think it isn't such a good idea to compress the new files (except .man). Either you compress both old and new ASMS binaries, or neither. There's no point in just compressing the new ones as people who'd care would prefer to do them all so they'll use a different program for it anyway.
In nlite, there's an option for that and the corresponding tooltip says it may create bugs. I thought it was an old comment and asked if it could be changed. Nuhi told me some OSes would still bug if one of the file was compressed.
Better safe than sorry, in the end, it is probably better not to cab everything.
And now, I can say this test releases is working perfectly.
Thanks again.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.