QUOTE (jaclaz @ Feb 16 2007, 07:05 PM)

Sure.
Then i'm right: you're eyes are closed.
swgreed asked to fix a problem caused from the SUBSTITUTION of
the original Win98SE-defrag.exe with the defrag.exe from WinME...
QUOTE (jaclaz @ Feb 16 2007, 07:05 PM)

I am too, but I try to give links related to the topic, not general, unrelated things.
...so from MY point of view substituting original WIN98SE-defrag.exe with an open source one IS related to the topic (guess how).
QUOTE (jaclaz @ Feb 16 2007, 07:05 PM)

I used (and posted a link to) jkdefrag, besides other utilities, a rather long time ago, here:
http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showto...85812&st=47Well, i find just one 3ad -except this- with the "jkdefrag" tag...
QUOTE (jaclaz @ Feb 16 2007, 07:05 PM)

Yes.
FreeDOS defrag, on the other hand, is known to be buggy, expecially on large volumes.
Well i unsderstand the difference between me and you: you just USE open source software while i'm trying to PROMOTE (even the develop of) it.
I don't post USABLE SOFTWARE but WANNABE IDEAS, can you see the difference ?
QUOTE (jaclaz @ Feb 16 2007, 07:05 PM)

Very good idea, and while you do it, we could plan to live forever happily, together with our flying elephants, but WHAT can this be related to solving the problem swgreed has?
jaclaz
While i'm not a developer i MUST try to stimulate indipendet developers to reach the solutions.
If this is wrong, then sorry, but the "evangelism" have to go on.
(anyway note that i'm not an
alone dreamer)