CODE
917734 (wmp9) ... do i need this if i'm using wmp11?
886185 (firewall) ... replaced by 889527?
888302 (windows) ... replaced by 926646?
890859 (windows kernel) ... replaced by 920867, then superceded by 934161?
891781 (dhtml editing) ... replaced by 906216 v3?
900725 (windows shell) ... replaced by 909608?
904942 v2 (msoe6) ... replaced by 927880?
914389 (server msg block) ... replaced by 918334?
917422 (windows kernel) ... replaced by 924867?
917734 (wmp9) ... do i need this if i'm using wmp11?
917953 (tcp/ip) ... replaced by 916852, then superceded by 925922?
923689 (wmp9-10) ... this is blocked by HFSLIP, right?
925876 (terminal svcs client 6) ... this is in conflict with client 5, right? could i use this instead?
929969 ... there's 1 for windows & another for ie7 ... i use ie7 ver so i do not need the other 1, correct?
930916 (stop 0x8e NTFS) ... replaced by 933876?
931784 (windows kernel) ... would this still be required even if other windows kernel updates (like the 2 above) already exist?
would there be a way to already show in the list use of wmp11? 886185 (firewall) ... replaced by 889527?
888302 (windows) ... replaced by 926646?
890859 (windows kernel) ... replaced by 920867, then superceded by 934161?
891781 (dhtml editing) ... replaced by 906216 v3?
900725 (windows shell) ... replaced by 909608?
904942 v2 (msoe6) ... replaced by 927880?
914389 (server msg block) ... replaced by 918334?
917422 (windows kernel) ... replaced by 924867?
917734 (wmp9) ... do i need this if i'm using wmp11?
917953 (tcp/ip) ... replaced by 916852, then superceded by 925922?
923689 (wmp9-10) ... this is blocked by HFSLIP, right?
925876 (terminal svcs client 6) ... this is in conflict with client 5, right? could i use this instead?
929969 ... there's 1 for windows & another for ie7 ... i use ie7 ver so i do not need the other 1, correct?
930916 (stop 0x8e NTFS) ... replaced by 933876?
931784 (windows kernel) ... would this still be required even if other windows kernel updates (like the 2 above) already exist?