• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

160 Excellent

About larryb123456

  • Rank
    Confused but Happy
  • Birthday 09/13/2013

Profile Information

  • OS
    Windows 7 x64
  1. Hello, everyone: This post, made today, February 6, 2016 and my last post in this thread, made exactly one year ago, on February 6, 2015, bracket a time span of exactly one year. The union of this post and my last post, then, to me, represents something of an art performance, in that it denotes and characterizes an aspect of the nebulous -- (collectively-agreed-upon objective in nature, while being mysteriously individually experientially subjective in nature) -- concept of "time." Thank you all for being part of my art performance by not posting anything on this thread that would lead to my responding and thereby terminating my art performance before I had planned to end it, today, February 6, 2016. Sincerely, Larry, AKA larryb123456 A simple graphic I made to celebrate the completion of my one-year-long art performance: Sources for images:
  2. Sade rules !!!
  3. That's great, Trip. Love the concept, the background and text shades, the composition, and the way the figure is in front of the black border. This is just my first response, a reaction based on my own "style," and not meant to be a criticism. I like the way the "aqua" text gets brighter toward the bottom and I'm wondering if the figure might look a little better with an "aqua" outer glow, with a value roughly equal to that of the text where it intersects the figure. I think the figure would "pop out" from the blue background (and the border) better, and maybe "unify" the whole image and the text might "flow" into the figure better, as well.
  4. Thanks, bphlpt. Doin' great!
  5. Oh the Windows 7 "donut"? I thought this was the Windows 7 "donut":
  6. Thanks so much, my friend, dencorso. That means a lot to me. You have always been there for me, in so many ways, and I do so appreciate it. Happy new year to you, as well !!!
  7. I just changed my previous signature, shown first, below, to my new signature, shown below that one: " What we achieve inwardly will change outer reality." Plutarch " What we achieve inwardly will change outer reality." Plutarch Guess that shows that in the time I've been away that I have been on the ball ... the eyeball, that is. Sorry for the groaner of a pun ............................................................................................... NOT! lol
  8. Happy birthday, Kel.
  9. @jaclaz: Noted. I will if you will ... or should that be, I won't if you won't ... or should that be, I will if you won't ... or should that be, I won't if you will ... ? ? ? ? Finis
  10. Today is a new day, and, again I find myself to be a new member of MSFN, but I won't make a post to state this obvious fact, since, in my humble opinion,obviousness oxidizes onerous obloquies, overwhelming overjoyed obsequies, objecting opaquely, oftentimes, obliterating obviousness, in my humble opinion. And that's all I have to say about that. Finis
  11. Thank you, jaclaz, for your input and your K9 machine gun. But don't you realize that your statement, "Your argument is invalid", invalidates your argument that "Your argument is invalid" ???
  12. @jaclaz, The Finder: Firstly, I sincerly hope you find an acceptable avatar for yourself. Secondly, I do so appreciate your feeble attempt at elucidation and the irrelevant image in your spoiler. I see you came with your humor gun loaded to respond to my heartfelt, passionate, and very sincere introduction of myself. The proof is found in this picture of you taken this afternoon, in Italy, by the anonymous photographer, A. Nonymous: Finally, the world sees how you waste your life, immersed in frivilous play, while posting pseudo-intellectual nonsensical gibberish on MSFN, a charge of which I will never be accused. I understand the sentiment in your spoiler, "Old pros studied their way to the top", but I more so strongly feel that, possibly, my apropos previously posted precarious prose poses possibilities preempting practical professionalism, possibly.
  13. @bphlpt: Thank you so much for the warm welcome into your universe. Since today is another new day, again I find myself as a new member, but I shan't make a new post, because I am not a proponent of repetitive repeating redundancy repeating repeitiively in redundancy. But, if you wish, you may welcome me again, if you wish. And you may welcome me each and every day, if your heart desires, but that isn't necessary. Please do whatever makes you happy, and you, and you alone, are the one to make the momentous decisions, such as this one, in your own life. Since you are a responsible adult, I have complete faith in knowing that you will make the correct and appropriate decision for you. And I will be able to deduce, by your action, or non-action, which choice you have made. So, the best thing for you to do is to ignore completely everything I've written here, and go back to living in a fantasy in your own little nasty world. @dencorso: I fully realize that your post was a thinly-disguised reference to the fact that you believe that I'm blissfully ignorant of all intellectual matters, floating in a netherworld of my own creation, bobbing up and down, drifting aimlessly in my self-created sea of Nirvana. My responses: #1 -- You hit the nail on the head! #2 -- You are very perceptive! Re: It's good to have you around! Will it still be good to have me around if I become a square (?), like the rest of the geek cats at MSFN! LOL sincerely, both in "sin" and "cerely", Larry
  14. Hello, all: It's a NEW day, so I'm kind of a new member, in my bumble humble interpretation. I hope that qualifies, and allows me to make this post and not get banned for abuse of the forum, in the process. I just want to re-establish the fact that I know absolutely nothing about the internal mysteries of computers, in the way that all you other geeks do. And I do appreciate your allowing me to hang around here for the last few years, contributing absolutely nothing! Sincerely, NEW member, Larry
  15. Today, I Googled my name, Larry, just to see what would pop up. I was very gratified to see that the dictionary definition of "larry" was totally correct and 100% accurate in all the important particulars: I fully suspect that my friends fiends dencorso, bptzxbpt, and jaclaz will not accept this definition. Why? They're just jealous, that's all. Finis Terminating Finis Final Terminating Finis Final Terminating Finality Finis Ultimate Final Terminating Finality Finis Absolute Ultimate Final Terminating Finality Finis Infinite Absolute Ultimate Final Terminating Finality Finis Infinity-To-The-Infinity-Power Infinite Absolute Ultimate Final Terminating Finality Finis