Sampei.Nihira

It is not insulting it is the evidence of facts,you are stupid trolls. Everyone in this forum knows that. And now I'll say goodbye because I have more to do than to be talking to a psychopath. Today I was sad and with you I had a lot of laughs,thank you.

Account #2 do you resent me because I consider you stupid? Disorders. You post a link with a thread I opened and you didn't even understand what was written in it otherwise you wouldn't be making these idiotic interventions. Get treatment.

Because they are made my account #1. Is it so hard to understand that I have various email accounts including TutaMail but the account that I consider most secure of all is NOT Tutamail or Pronton Mail. I have a colleague who used to teach elementary school if you want I will call him and have him come to this forum and explain it to you to account #2

But where did you read account #2 that I never used what I recommend? If you want I can recommend a very good psychiatrist.

I made a simple point of information. Always wrong conclusions.......... My personal emails in a more private and secure form do not use both ProtonMail and Tutanota. And of course I will not mention in this thread which email service I use because it does not interest the OP and above all it is info that will remain strictly personal.

Yes you are right,I will delete the not working test (Brave).

It is a privacy-related feature. In addition to the list of filters you mentioned @UCyborg other filter lists with these features are those of DandelionSprout (The most famous is Actually Legitimate URL Shortener Tool).

This is clearly stated in the Tuta FAQ. I recommend that you read them: Have a good evening. P.S. I don't comment on javascript injection because I still have to eat dinner and I don't want food to get stuck in my stomach. You are right @NotHereToPlayGames here users have preconceived notions that are difficult to eradicate.............

Try Tutamail. By default (but you then change) it uses password encrypted email sending. In order for the recipient to read the email and possibly open attachments, they must know the password you chose during sending. The recipient of course is informed (via client-email) that he or she has received an email. Obviously all this assumes that you have a browser (the email is read using the web-mail method) set up reasonably well from a security/privacy standpoint. In the image the email received. Without a password it cannot be read.

Yes, almost everyone uses the same e-mail they have in their smartphone (Gmail). I include 2 more secure email services: https://proton.me/mail https://tuta.com/ It is possible to register a free account.

My interest in scripts is specifically for security/privacy. So I block all HTTP website scripts in the browser. Almost all links to malwares content are HTTP. But with a simple rule in uBO you can do the same.

Check if you are in this situation: https://www.ghacks.net/2024/04/23/windows-11-24h2-wont-boot-if-the-pc-does-not-support-this-cpu-feature/ to check the CPU you can use CPU-Z which must be started from administrator account: https://www.cpuid.com/softwares/cpu-z.html

If any MSFN members want to test. Warning: The link in the image is an active phishing website (at the moment). So be careful and do not enter any data.

Correct. But even in W.10/11 in many malicious websites with (HTTPS) phishing content (this is not often the case for websites with malware content) the certificate is valid and nothing prevents the browser (at a given initial instant of time) from opening the malicious web page without any problem. P.S. In fact, I would be curious to see how your browsers (on W.XP) would treat these web pages,but the test should be done quickly after I put in the phishing link.

Although very dated might I suggest this test to evaluate the better/worse intrinsic security of Thorium vs Supermium? Perhaps the score is identical: https://browseraudit.com/