Jump to content
Strawberry Orange Banana Lime Leaf Slate Sky Blueberry Grape Watermelon Chocolate Marble
Strawberry Orange Banana Lime Leaf Slate Sky Blueberry Grape Watermelon Chocolate Marble

MSFN is made available via donations, subscriptions and advertising revenue. The use of ad-blocking software hurts the site. Please disable ad-blocking software or set an exception for MSFN. Alternatively, register and become a site sponsor/subscriber and ads will be disabled automatically. 



cyberformer

Member
  • Content count

    148
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About cyberformer

Profile Information

  • Country
  1. Win7 post-SP1 patches

    This is going to seem crazy Luxman, but I just started using 7 just the past three months, and that infrequently so far. I have no knowledge yet of the major differences between the two! Ridiculous I know. My only guess, is that I was so shocked at witnessing the crystal clean and perfect display, go all gamma faded, almost impossible to see--panicked me! Never even thought to think about removing the updates. Usually, I am quite calm, collected, and methodical: not that time though.
  2. Win7 post-SP1 patches

    I could not find where to ask this, concerning the WannaCry patch for Win 7. I noticed that the patch or patches are in one of the up-date roll ups, either March, or May I think---but the one of those Kbs contained some kind of graphic enhancements of sorts; the last time I updated my Lenovo all in ones with all the MS up-dates (about three months back)--the screen changed to practically all gamma! Going into the graphic options, I had to set things to a very dark look, just to read anything: no thing worked. I read, that this was a common problem when that new graphic driver was installed. I restored the computer to factory condition, and do not want to go through all that again. The roll-up seems to be in the 30 or so mb range--can one remove the offending updated driver?
  3. That does not seem very encouraging heinoganda! ---by additional security gap, I take that to mean that the possibility I posited is indeed possible? I hope I've misconstrued the meaning of the info you offered!
  4. Though I know next to nothing about coding, sdfox7--The first thing I would do is to extract other kb patches, notice similiarities, and then look for something in the most recent patch to see if it was seemingly out of place, or placed there for no reasonable reason. I would look for an odd order of configuration, construct, etc.
  5. Hi Dibya! Any agency that has the legal authority, clout, to do so--for good or evil purposes. Could such a two sided patch be coded such as to be UN-discoverable even by coding experts? My knowledge of coding is nil.
  6. I feel we have let the tin-foil hat people out of this, so I am going to ask the following: Though highly improbable, what are the chances that the XP patch cannot only patch the wanna cry worm/virus vulnerability, but also create a hidden window in XP making it more accessible for Official Snoops that find XP harder to access than Win 7, 8, and 10? Has the code of the patch (can it be?) been studied by any experts knowledgeable enough and daring enough to divulge such info, if such is discoverable? Someone had to bring this up, if I've not missed it!
  7. AT&T Uverse and 9x systems?

    Thanks nostalgic98! and everyone else. Yes, I am well aware of the bloat-ware from previous internet company CDs. We shall see how it goes.
  8. AT&T Uverse and 9x systems?

    sdfox7 said " That system will work fine with U Verse " sdfox7, do you mean Win 9x. or is this in reference to something else? If so, what if things have changed since you had Uverse?
  9. AT&T Uverse and 9x systems?

    Thank you for all that info cov3rt! I've downloaded the Mcafee version of wsc gaurd 4.0 . From what I understand, Win 98Se and Win Me, should not be too much of a problem? Seems that 95 and standard 98--from your experiences--can be toilsome as well troublesome. So long as I can get on easily with XP. 98se, and Me--I can wait to work on giving 95 a go. I am wondering if it is easier to use all of them with Cox cable? I do have an old Motorola Modem (I think it has just recently been replaced from what I hear)--and the CD that has the Win 9x drivers (not sure about 95)--that might still get me on the internet if I get go cable. Lot of research to do ere time runs out!
  10. AT&T Uverse and 9x systems?

    I've received a letter from at&t telling me only 45 days are left for me to get Uverse, due to the transition from the regular DSL I've used for years; that my internet services will be interrupted completely if I do not upgrade. I called the tech chap over there (a pleasant fellow) and asked him several questions regarding getting online with Win 98versions, as well as Win 95. He said, that as long as the operating system had a TCP/IP stack and protocol--etc, that it would be no problem. When I asked him if the Uverse modem had to have drivers installed for "any" PC to recognize the modem, he said no, that it was a router--and one can just get online. It has always been my assumption that a modem needs drivers for the PC to recognize it. My current DSL modem certainly did. So far as routers go, I've no idea, having never fooled with one. Is anyone here using a 9x system with Uverse? And if so was it a chore to get it to work? Any and all info concerning this matter would be greatly appreciated. They also told me that dial up is no longer offered in my area, and that they were going to phase it out completely!
  11. Software compatible with ME only?

    Not quite sure about any software off hand, but the law of Probabilities would seem to deem it so. I do know, that an old Sound Blaster 24 Bit---states (and does) work on Win Me, but not 98 versions. I am certain that though it does not work out of the box for 9x versions below Me---the drivers could be modified to do so. I've never had any problems with Me yet (with or without IE). It has always been very stable for me and rather crash resistant. I do find though (and oddly) that the HD seems to become fragmented more often than others---needing frequent defragging.
  12. If it's someone's pet, that got away---you would have to find the owner, and ask him or her what they named it. Seriously thugh---can you take a pic of it, and upload it here? I bet someone members would know.
  13. Would it be worth upgrading from 95 to 2000?

    Thanks for that info jaclaz--! If I ever have to reinstall 2K (for me it's so stable it is scary) --I will give that method a try.
  14. Would it be worth upgrading from 95 to 2000?

    Hellow Andrew! I feel for you--coming across the same things you mention when using my own Win 95 ancient Dell. I have an old Win 2000 PC that I've removed Internet Explorer from using that IEradicator program, most use to yank it out of 9x machines. I think the IEradicator program only works if only service pack 1 or just up to SP2 has been installed.; someone would have to check out what the read-me says, And as would be expected, 2K is appreciable faster once IE has been removed!
  15. XP OS vulnerabilities after April 8, 2014

    Humpf! ....Well how do you like that!
×