1. This is not a warez site! Links/Requests to warez and/or illegal material (porn, cracks, serials, etc..) will not be tolerated. Discussion of circumventing WGA/activation/timebombs/keygens or any other illegal activity will also not be tolerated. You will be banned without notice.
Last warning. We will not tolerate any, i mean any illegal activity. We are very close to lock this forum. Think about it when you post your questions or requests.
![]() ![]() |
Dec 7 2008, 02:34 PM Post
#1 | |
| Newbie Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 2-August 07 Member No.: 149084 OS: none | What is this thing? This is a fun toy to have on any system. It's a little like HashTab... except with more features... and better usability... and a much less bloated footprint. HashCheck gives you a hashes tab in the file properties dialog, but it lets you hash more than one file at once (and even entire directory trees). And it can create checksum files (like the .sfv files that accompany some torrents or the .md5 files that I often use). It can load and verify checksum files. And all for a final installed size of less than 100 KB. Supports both x86-32 and x86-64 systems. Screenshots ![]() Details Website: HashCheck Shell Extension (Bugs/Suggestions) Install Location: %SystemRoot%\System32\ShellExt Uninstallable: Yes Download (version 2.1.11) Links: Download MD5: 66e838262e3b71bb567df42e2f064f33 Size: 0.05 MiB μArch: x86-32, x86-64 (single installer for both x86-32 and x86-64) Languages: en, cs, de, el, es, fr, it, ja, ko, nl, pl, pt-BR, pt-PT, ro, ru, sv, tr, uk, zh-CN, zh-TW (Translation Info) Note: This addon is compatible with both the RVM Integrator and with nLite. This post has been edited by code65536: Jul 6 2009, 11:16 PM |
| | |
Dec 9 2008, 06:47 AM Post
#2 | |
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 623 Joined: 8-February 07 Member No.: 125681 OS: XP Pro x86 |
It's better then HashTab. Hope that Kells will include this in his addon pack. Edit: Can you implement the ability to check what type of hash can we use (like in HashTab), comparing with another file and add more hashes? Thanks! This post has been edited by radix: Dec 9 2008, 07:11 AM |
| | |
Dec 12 2008, 09:38 AM Post
#3 | |
| Newbie Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 2-August 07 Member No.: 149084 OS: none | QUOTE 2008/12/12 - 2.1.0
|
| | |
Dec 12 2008, 11:45 AM Post
#4 | |
| Junior ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 76 Joined: 21-August 08 Member No.: 206393 OS: Vista Business x86 |
Great tool, works like a charm. One feature request: Ability to choose which hashes to check for like hashtab and add program version in add/remove programs entry. Thanks for the tool. |
| | |
Dec 12 2008, 12:33 PM Post
#5 | |
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 623 Joined: 8-February 07 Member No.: 125681 OS: XP Pro x86 | |
| | |
Dec 12 2008, 12:47 PM Post
#6 | |
| Junior ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 76 Joined: 21-August 08 Member No.: 206393 OS: Vista Business x86 |
I don't think you understand me. This is how it is now: ![]() And this is what I mean: ![]() It's just a minor thing, but I think it's nice to know the exact version that it's installed. This post has been edited by XhmikosR: Dec 12 2008, 12:48 PM |
| | |
Dec 12 2008, 02:20 PM Post
#7 | |
| Newbie Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 2-August 07 Member No.: 149084 OS: none | And this is what I mean: ![]() There is a version column in the add/remove programs box, but by default, Vista hides this column (XP did not hide this information). If you right-click on the column headers and select "More", you can turn on the Version column, and you'll be able to see then version numbers. |
| | |
Dec 12 2008, 07:34 PM Post
#8 | |
| Junior ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 76 Joined: 21-August 08 Member No.: 206393 OS: Vista Business x86 |
I know that I can display the version number by adding that column, but because of the fact that by default it doesn't show up, it would be nice if the version number was included in the program title. Again, thanks for your great program. |
| | |
Dec 12 2008, 08:40 PM Post
#9 | |
| Newbie Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 2-August 07 Member No.: 149084 OS: none | QUOTE 2008/12/12 - 2.1.1
|
| | |
Dec 18 2008, 02:44 PM Post
#10 | |
| Newbie Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 2-August 07 Member No.: 149084 OS: none | QUOTE 2008/12/18 - 2.1.2
|
| | |
Dec 23 2008, 09:54 PM Post
#11 | |
| Newbie Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 2-August 07 Member No.: 149084 OS: none | QUOTE 2008/12/23 - 2.1.3
|
| | |
Jan 7 2009, 09:01 PM Post
#12 | |
| Newbie Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 2-August 07 Member No.: 149084 OS: none | QUOTE 2009/01/07 - 2.1.4
|
| | |
Jan 8 2009, 12:39 AM Post
#13 | |
| Member ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 167 Joined: 27-November 08 From: INDIA Member No.: 220754 OS: Vista Ultimate x86 |
simply great888888888888
|
| | |
Jan 14 2009, 01:16 AM Post
#14 | |
| Newbie Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 2-August 07 Member No.: 149084 OS: none | QUOTE 2009/01/13 - 2.1.5
Update: 2009/01/14 - Refreshed the installer to fix a minor bug that prevented the temp files used by the installer from being cleaned up after install in certain cases. No other changes were made, and the binaries within the installer are unchanged. This post has been edited by code65536: Apr 7 2009, 08:14 PM |
| | |
Jan 20 2009, 04:53 PM Post
#15 | |
| Newbie Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 2-August 07 Member No.: 149084 OS: none | QUOTE 2009/01/22 - 2.1.7
This post has been edited by code65536: Apr 7 2009, 08:13 PM |
| | |
Mar 2 2009, 01:07 PM Post
#16 | |
| Newbie Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 2-August 07 Member No.: 149084 OS: none | QUOTE 2009/03/17 - 2.1.8.3
This post has been edited by code65536: Apr 7 2009, 08:12 PM |
| | |
Jun 8 2009, 05:13 AM Post
#17 | |
| Newbie Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 2-August 07 Member No.: 149084 OS: none | QUOTE 2009/06/07 - 2.1.9
|
| | |
Jun 22 2009, 11:50 PM Post
#18 | |
| Newbie Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 2-August 07 Member No.: 149084 OS: none | |
| | |
Jul 1 2009, 07:32 PM Post
#19 | |
| Newbie Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 2-August 07 Member No.: 149084 OS: none | QUOTE 2009/07/01 - 2.1.11
|
| | |
Jul 4 2009, 01:55 PM Post
#20 | |
| Newbie Group: Members Posts: 38 Joined: 29-April 09 Member No.: 242333 OS: XP Pro x86 |
Thank you for your efforts with HashCheck - love the utility for sure! I do wish you would change "UNREADABLE" to "MISSING" - this is more appropriate for the file state if I understand this is the only condition for "unreadable" ie; the file is "missing". Regardless, HashCheck is a great tool. Mike |
| | |
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 10:31 PM |