MSFN Forum: alternatives to windows - MSFN Forum

Jump to content


Think before posting!

If your post is even remotely technical in nature, it probably doesn't belong here. Take another look at the forums and try to find the *right* location before posting a technical question here.
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

alternatives to windows

#21 User is offline   XxMaNsOnX 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 42
  • Joined: 24-August 01

Posted 10 February 2002 - 09:49 PM

Ah, yeah. Their priority servers are quite faster, but just use a mirror, there are hundreds. Check out http://www.redhat.com/mirrors.html


#22 User is offline   aKaFrEE 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 357
  • Joined: 21-October 01

Posted 10 February 2002 - 09:53 PM

im d/ling redhat 7.2 and i was using FlashFXP and getting like 10 kb/sec....then i installed DAP (in spit of speedbits litlle spyware) and im pulling like 40 kb/sec now....anyone recommend a D/L accelerator?

#23 User is offline   Aaron 

  • The MSFN Banana
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 5,767
  • Joined: 17-August 01
  • OS:ME
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 10 February 2002 - 10:04 PM

Flashget, makes as many simultaneous connections as you want (www.amazesoft.com - site is down at time of typing this) DAP only allows 4 connections last time I used it.

#24 User is offline   aKaFrEE 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 357
  • Joined: 21-October 01

Posted 10 February 2002 - 11:01 PM

im going to d/l flashget when im done downloading RedHat....right now DAP uses 7 connections...

#25 User is offline   XPerties 

  • MSFN OG Senior
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 2,994
  • Joined: 18-August 01
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 11 February 2002 - 08:52 AM

DAP works great for me with the right settings and the server is good Ive gotten 500kb/s downloading in the past. Yes it allows 7 connections

-XPerties

#26 User is offline   Blackwar 

  • Your Worst Nightmare
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 580
  • Joined: 21-January 02

Posted 11 February 2002 - 09:18 AM

[quote:8fc19d3e99="XPerties"]
DAP works great for me with the right settings and the server is good Ive gotten 500kb/s downloading in the past. Yes it allows 7 connections

-XPerties [/quote:8fc19d3e99]

wow sweet
are u sure u said 500kb/s?? **** thats a lot
like 100x more than me... heh, at least enjoy it until graduation from college i will say :)

#27 User is offline   Micropocalypse 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 306
  • Joined: 07-September 01

Posted 11 February 2002 - 11:17 PM

mandrake worked fine for me, and redhat wouldnt.

#28 User is offline   FthrJACK 

  • I am a PC...
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 3,394
  • Joined: 16-August 01
  • OS:Server 2008 x64

Posted 13 February 2002 - 03:02 AM

heh... lamo mandraker lol :)

#29 User is offline   Micropocalypse 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 306
  • Joined: 07-September 01

Posted 13 February 2002 - 03:09 AM

redhat wouldnt eaven recognise my scsi. also it comes with the same driver as mandrake, so it wasnt the driver.

#30 User is offline   suse lover 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 17-February 02

Posted 18 February 2002 - 11:07 PM

I used to collect OSes for a while after getting cable, so I'll tell ya:

Favorite:BeOS hands down. the whole time I ran it, it crashed one program and NOT the OS. Everthing was easy to use as hell, and you could do almost anything from the right click menu which I love.
Con: No drivers at all!!! I have never been able to get cable running on it, even after sneaking looks in the $35 BeOS bible that was at Borders.


QNX- was ok but couldn't detect half my stuff (this was almost a year ago)I might try it again.

Linuxes:
SuSe: The best (obviously! :)) 7.2 personal is sooo easy to use and you get real books not that PDF crap you get in other Linuxes.

Mandrake: 8.0 was the best of the lot. The newest ones are so slooooww. And it didn't like my soundcard either (crystal)

Redhat: a little tougher to use than mandrake, and hated my soundcard too.

Redmond: love the solitaire game! Doesn't like my network cards. And the first install screwed up my boot record.

Lindows: the preview was a piece of trash! It ran IE5 but crashed when I tried to open Internet options!! The whole system went down!!
Winamp doesn't work either,as did not half the programs I threw at it.
And they cut the balls off KDE. It isn't nearly as configurable as standard KDE. And control is just KDE control center renamed. It says it as soon as you open it up. Redmond is better, even though it doesn't have the enhanced WINE.

Corel: Don't even waste your time.


FREE BSD: I tried this once. ONCE. you have to be a hardware engineer just to install it, and a Unix admin to run it.

To learn about free BSD go to www.linuxisforbitches.com :rolleyes:

I will give QNX another try tho.


As far as a d/l manager Getright has Multisource (like fasttrack or edonkey-DONKEY forever!!!!!)

I got two mandrake ISOs from www.linuxiso.org within two hours with multisourcing on getright. That's 1.3 GB in less than 2 hours!!!!!

#31 User is offline   TurricaN 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10
  • Joined: 04-April 11
  • OS:ME
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 04 April 2011 - 01:38 PM

View PostBig Booger, on 27 January 2002 - 07:11 AM, said:

Plan 9 & Inferno

Plan 9 with better driver support is here: http://www.quanstro....atom/index.html

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2013 msfn.org
Privacy Policy