[AmdM]

Thanks john.

just 2 more questions.

How can i edit the Run1_XP-64.bat file? edit, just found out. 2 easy 2 be true

And is the addon to put in svcpack form or as exe?

This post has been edited by AmdM: 13 November 2008 - 08:27 PM

[Kurt_Aust]

November updates

Deletions:
Hotfix\190-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB936021-x64-ENU.exe
Hotfix\195-msxml4-KB936181-enu.exe
Hotfix\200-msxml6-KB933579-enu-amd64.exe


Additions:

Hotfix\
@ . . . 590-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB958644-x64-ENU.exe [1,288,568]
# ▼ 600-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB955069-x64-ENU.exe [4,885,552]
# ▼ 610-msxml4-KB954430-enu.exe [5,687,304] Optional, Microsoft XML Core Services 4.0 Service Pack 2
@ . . . 620-msxml6-KB954459-enu-amd64.exe [1,851,912] Optional, Microsoft XML Core Services 6.0 Service Pack 1, required if installing .Net 3.5
@ . . . 630-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB957097-x64-ENU.exe [1,214,000]

EDIT: Oops, forgot to mention there was a minor revision increment for the Windows update agent, far from critical though
RunOnce\# ▼ WindowsUpdateAgent30-x64.exe [7,040,352] updated 31 Oct 08


Johnhc:
Java VM installs just fine for me using the silent install switches in Run1_XP-64.bat, it shows in add/remove programs and Vuze bittorrent client will install and run. Sun's page with silent install instructions is here, but as you can see it doesn't go into great depth.

AmdM:
Unless otherwise noted, just place the original installer file at \AddOns for those applications that are supported. You can use the various addon .cab files that others have made (very useful for those programs without decent silent install options), but you will have to extract the actual executable and place that at \AddOns while adding the installation command (from entries*.ini within the .cab file) to Run*_XP-64.bat.

This post has been edited by Kurt_Aust: 15 November 2008 - 04:08 AM

[johnhc]

Kurt_Aust, thanks for the reply but it is really strange it works for you and not me. Since the install is silent, I see no error just no Java in Add/Remove or in the Control Panel.
Thanks, John.

[esipoko]

Thanks for the fablious thread.
I got error message "integration faild" from nlite after integrating IE7 for several hotfixes eg. 040,...
Why does that happen?

[johnhc]

esipoko,
We need more information. Please attach (not paste) your LastSession.ini and make sure you are not running nLite against a source that has been nLited before.
Enjoy, John.

[Kurt_Aust]

esipoko, on Nov 16 2008, 10:55 AM, said:

Thanks for the fablious thread.
I got error message "integration faild" from nlite after integrating IE7 for several hotfixes eg. 040,...
Why does that happen?

At a guess, you list XP Media Centre edition as your OS, you cannot execute this guide under XP MCE as it is a 32-bit operating system.

You need to execute it under XP Pro x64 or Vista x64.

[EvveLover]

Microsoft has released a range of other non-critical updates for all versions of Windows. You can browse through the list here, or wait for them to become available via Windows Update.

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/Browse....rtCriteria=date

[TranceEnergy]

As i'm editing my list on almost a daily basis, it's already updated. =)

[Kurt_Aust]

December updates

Deletions:
Hotfix\380-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB948590-x64-ENU.exe
Hotfix\460-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB951072-x64-ENU.exe
Hotfix\580-IE7-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB956390-x64-ENU.exe


Additions:
Hotfix\
@ . . . 640-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB954600-x64-ENU.exe [817,016]
@ . . . 650-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB956802-x64-ENU.exe [1,344,888]
@ . . . 660-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB955839-x64-ENU.exe [737,656]
# ▼ 670-IE7-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB958215-x64-ENU.exe [37,197,176]

WMP11\
@ . . . WindowsMedia11-KB952069-x64-ENU.exe [1,865,616]

This post has been edited by Kurt_Aust: 12 December 2008 - 01:46 AM

[TranceEnergy]

Could you comment on WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB954600-x64-ENU.exe ? I already had the others.
Is it necessary if one do not even use the old media player 6.4 for streaming? I dont think i've ever used it for that. Just curious here.

[Kurt_Aust]

TranceEnergy, on Dec 12 2008, 10:22 PM, said:

Could you comment on WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB954600-x64-ENU.exe ?

WMP 6.4 is part of the default installation, hence the update is viewed as required. I suspect it is there mainly for compatibility reasons, although it's possible that other components call upon it in a manner invisible to the user.

Side note: WMP 6.4 is also the basis for the popular Media Player Classic.

This post has been edited by Kurt_Aust: 12 December 2008 - 03:57 PM

[Kurt_Aust]

Well they've been busy in the week leading up to Christmas over at the Redmond campus, since patch Tuesday the following updates have become available.

At \Hotfix (critical zero day Internet Explorer remote code execution exploit fix):
# ▼ 680-IE7-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB960714-x64-ENU.exe [8,686,968]

At \RunOnce (.Net Framework 3.5 Service Pack 2 wannabe):
% ▼ NDP20SP2-KB958481-x64.exe [19,282,272]
MD5: 37CD8D927566FCABF4DFFCBBE63D16EF
SHA1: 1392380EF7BAABD531F35EE5799C255A03B0DCBE
% ▼ NDP30SP2-KB958483-x64.exe [17,262,944]
MD5: 6B08400F889D7004E705363530C83E32
SHA1: 84062CF4C3F303F3641E3F730F60FDEA51BC776F
% ▼ NDP35SP1-KB958484-x64.exe [1,472,352]
MD5: 94E97AC8F788252BFF2704859CB5C737
SHA1: E69006433C1006C53DA651914DC8162BBDD80D41

So apart from putting out a real .Net 3.5 sp2 (and for goodness sake, drop Itanium support from the package, anyone who has one should know enough to download a separate package) they also need to put out service pack 1 for:
IE7 (installer=28.2MB, patches=45.1MB) &
WMP11 (16 patches according to Boooggy's list).

[johnhc]

Kurt_Aust, is there any reason that .Net Framework and it's updates cannot be integrated with nLite. This might be faster and make the ISO smaller. Thanks, John.

[Kurt_Aust]

.Net integration is something of a holy grail, OnePiece has apparently been able to get it to work with .Net 1.1 sp1 for XP (32-bit) and 2000, but nobody has been able to do the same for .Net 2.0 or later.

There are AddOns that install .Net 2.0 from SVCPACK at T-13, but unfortunately that won't make the install significantly faster or the ISO significantly smaller.

.Net 3.0 + still has to be installed after first boot.

[johnhc]

OK, thanks Kurt_Aust, John.

[freshhh]

how to bypass the popup "File is newer than the one integrating" and answer yes by default at "Do you want to keep the newer file" ?

so bad that there isn't something like a "Yes to all" button option...

i choose gui mode (not full auto) since i dont want to make a full silent install and add my name,...

btw how comes so many files are newer on the iso than on the patches?

ty

This post has been edited by freshhh: 02 January 2009 - 02:12 PM

[freshhh]

direct integration for patches bellow is not supported, do i have to force it and use the regular integration method for those hotfixes ?
are they still needed ?

190-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB936021-x64-ENU.exe
195-msxml4-KB936181-enu.exe
200-msxml6-KB933579-enu-amd64.exe
450-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB953839-x64-ENU.exe
480-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB946648-x64-ENU.exe

[Kurt_Aust]

Please attach your "Last Session.ini" as all those hotfixes should integrate. Were you running nLite as an administrator?

EDIT: Looking back at the hotfix list, all those hotfixes except 480- are obsolete.

This post has been edited by Kurt_Aust: 02 January 2009 - 02:44 PM

[johnhc]

freshhh, I never get any of these messages, so no need to answer 'yes' always. All your listed hot fixes except 480 are no longer in Kurt_Aust's list. Please see the first page for an accurate list of the updates. Enjoy, John.

[freshhh]

thank you both for your quick reply!

yes i'm running xLite as an admin (latest build but anyway, same case before with others builds)

well the truth is that i don't use regular sp1 or sp2 build but an already more recent one own made with nLite... so i guess this is why i've many popups... ;-) but i'd like to know if there is a workaround to accept all more recent files by default please?
i dunno if there is any advantages to use a more recent iso than the sp2 but i thought it should even be better (less operations/lighter) ;-)

yes i noticed all those hotfixes are not in the list but still wonder why coz it was there before and listed at windowsupdate.com , in my theory maybe more recent hotfixes do the same things , well i'll remove them from my dir...

what about 480 ? why is this hotfix listed if it cant be auto added, should i use the regular integration method to integrate it ?

last but not least... i'm using Sandboxie x64 (not anymore supported) and i know i should not install the following fix :

160 WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB932596-x64-ENU.exe because of conflict with new Kernel Patch Protection...

but Microsoft has made another hotfix recently that causes also trouble with Sandboxie (BSOD) do u guys know what fix it is?

btw any alternative to Sandboxie that is not too big (like WMware) ? i heard of Shadow Defender but this is only available for x32 :-/

best regards

freshhh

This post has been edited by freshhh: 02 January 2009 - 07:00 PM