[133794m3r]

Ok now this may be out of order here but... When i do all that is said here and try to boot from the iso that is made or by using the files i can't boot from it. I aboslutely love nlite.

[fraquar]

johnhc, on May 2 2009, 09:24 PM, said:

[*]WMP11 is slipped via nLite by simply placing the installer into the Hot Fix section - you must have booogy's WMP11 Slipstreamer installed on your system

Isn't the point of using the WMP11 Slipstreamer so that it slipstreams it into the source to begin with?

[johnhc]

133794m3r, please attach (not paste) your Last Session.ini. Make sure to always start with a fresh copy of your CD files/folders, do all your work in one nLite session and integrate only one SP. Please report when you have a solution, so others can benefit. Enjoy, John.

Edit: Some questions:How did you burn your ISO? What is your source CD - OEM, Retail, Recovery, etc? Do you get an error? Please post it if so. Are you booting on HW or a virtual system?

fraquar,

Quote

Isn't the point of using the WMP11 Slipstreamer so that it slipstreams it into the source to begin with?

Yes, and that is what happens when you place WMP11 installer into the nLite Hot Fix section. It is detected and nLite calls booogy's slipper. Enjoy, John.

This post has been edited by johnhc: 03 May 2009 - 09:49 AM

[Kurt_Aust]

As IE8 is now being pushed out via Windows Update, Ive added a poll to give me some idea of where to focus my testing regime.

[Kurt_Aust]

Boring month, the only change was an update to the IE8 compatibility list:

Delete
RunOnce\IE8-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB968220-x64-ENU.exe

Add
% ▼ RunOnce\IE8-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB969497-x64-ENU.exe [686,464]
MD5: 512A3C08EE9F562ECFD9FB7F33B1AF4E
SHA-1: E42D3BE6D4A5E0E6A6EC3755DA79048A8149747A


There is a new version of Comodo Internet Security out but it gives me a System Service Exception BSOD, here's the link to the previous version:
http://download.comodo.com/cis/download/se...P_Vista_x64.exe

[johnhc]

Kurt_Aust, I just DLed what I thought was CIS 507, but it turned out to be 509. It installs and seems to run OK on my VM. See here.
Specifics:
Size: 73.7 MB (77,369,632 bytes) - Size on DL site is wrong!
MD5: 70db4a9cae82387c0e23cfeffe34d62b
SHA1: 82490b8dc390cc76d8a2c59581cc127ebebd516e
It's supposed to fix BSODs. Enjoy, John.

[Kurt_Aust]

JohnHC:

Yeah, I noticed that they updated it last night when I was trying to get a BSOD minidump to submit.

However I'll hold off updating the main post for now as CIS (and its predecessor CFP) has a history of being a bit wobbly after a major update, quick fire bugfix releases for the next couple of weeks are quite likely.

Also the download page still links to the *.507 version, for a company whose main business is selling web products, its website sucks (no option to download older versions, no link to the forums, forums poorly laid out with substandard search function).

[johnhc]

Kurt_Aust, I agree with your delay. I certainly will not install it on my real machine. I also agree with all your other comments! Do like their product, though. Enjoy, John.

[Kurt_Aust]

June updates, migrated guide to IE8

Deletions:
Hotfix\ 020-IE7-WindowsServer2003-x64-enu.exe\
Hotfix\180-IE7-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB938127-x64-ENU.exe
Hotfix\210-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB933729-x64-ENU.exe
Hotfix\730-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB958690-x64-ENU.exe
Hotfix\810-IE7-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB963027-x64-ENU.exe
RunOnce\IE8-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB969497-x64-ENU.exe
RunOnce\WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB960715-x64-ENU.exe

Additions:
\Hotfix
@ . . . 810-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB969898-x64-ENU.exe [672,128]
@ . . . 820-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB961501-x64-ENU.exe [1,051,520]
@ ▼ 830-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB968537-x64-ENU.exe [4,319,624]
@ . . . 840-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB970238-x64-ENU.exe [2,443,120]
@ . . . 850-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB970483-x64-ENU.exe [1,010,032]

\RunOnce, Internet Explorer 8 & updates
# ▼ IE8-WindowsServer2003-x64-ENU.exe [33,972,080]
# ▼ IE8-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB969897-x64-ENU.exe [37,902,192]
@ . . . IE8-WindowsServer2003.WindowsXP-KB971180-x64-ENU.exe [686,448]

[johnhc]

Thanks, Kurt_Aust for all your work! I am really glad you moved to IE8! Have fun, John.

EDIT: I am curious. Have you considered going to 5eraph's IE8 Real AddOn? I use it, then place all the IE8 updates into the hot fix section.

This post has been edited by johnhc: 13 June 2009 - 08:51 AM

[Kurt_Aust]

johnhc, on Jun 14 2009, 12:37 AM, said:

Thanks, Kurt_Aust for all your work! I am really glad you moved to IE8! Have fun, John.

EDIT: I am curious. Have you considered going to 5eraph's IE8 Real AddOn? I use it, then place all the IE8 updates into the hot fix section.

IE8 support has been there for the last 2 months, the only real change has been that (due to the poll results) IE8 components have been included in the 7-Zip archives and torent rather than IE7 components.

5eraph's IE8 AddOn works perfectly fine as far as I can tell, however using it involves accepting some tweaks, which inevitably won't suit everyone. As 5eraph keeps it fully up to date, you shouldn't need to add any IE8 updates to \Hotfix.

Mind you I'm still unimpressed with the fact that the cumulative update (even the very first one) is larger than the original IE8 installer, why not just release an updated installer and be done with it?

[5eraph]

I could change the addon to disable all tweaks by default if you believe it would be best, Kurt_Aust. Leaving them active was another case of laziness on my part. I've had no feedback concerning them as yet, so I don't know what anybody else thinks about them.

Most IE 7/8 tweaks must be applied per user, which requires a special method which is implemented in this addon and those made by others for other platforms. So far I've been using a simple addon to reenable the tweaks currently disabled by default in the IE8 addon. It wouldn't be difficult to change this behavior slightly for public release of the enabling addon and a revised IE8 addon.

Please, let me know what you think.

[Kurt_Aust]

5eraph, I don't think I can answer that question as I can't know what the majority of users prefer. I'd suggest adding a poll to see if there's some sort of consensus view on the subject.

[johnhc]

5eraph and Kurt_Aust, this is what I would like to see:
An IE8 AddOn with no updates. I will get my updates as I see fit from the Kurt_Aust list.
I personally like the tweaks that are currently present in your AddOn, 5eraph. But I would agree with an AddOn with only the original installer, as long as you will give us a method to include your tweaks. Perhaps a separate AddOn of your tweaks and I could add my own.
I was unaware that you, 5eraph, were including newly released updates into the AddOn. This would mean that I would need to get me a new copy of your AddOn each time updates are released. I would rather have one place for my updates (Kurt_Aust) and only update the IE8 AddOn for 5eraph's possible corrections (probably low at this time). Thanks to both of you for you work. Enjoy, John.

[5eraph]

Actually, KB969897 can be slipstreamed with nLite on top of addon v2009-05_3 (I've tested ). Any compatibility view list updates newer than KB971180 can also be slipstreamed when they're released. But there's still the matter of the tweaks, which is valid.

Give me some time to determine the most efficient method of dealing with the tweaks. In the meantime, 5erIE8.inf can be edited to change the existing tweaks or add your own by scrolling to the very end of the file and making the necessary changes anywhere after the [Tweaks.Addreg] section marker.

However, I will continue to release up-to-date IE8 addons for RVMi users. It will remain your choice to download fully updated versions or roll your own updates into a clean, untweaked version to be released shortly.

This post has been edited by 5eraph: 13 June 2009 - 03:14 PM

[johnhc]

5eraph, thanks, I really appreciate your willingness to respond to requests. Enjoy, John.

[5eraph]

Request filled, johnhc. Read the Notes section for details on modifying tweaks.

[johnhc]

5eraph, thanks much! I have DLed both the unpatched/untweaked AddOn and the .ini for your tweaks. I have a couple of questions. When I finish modify the .ini do I just compress it with 7-Zip and place it into my hot fix section? I notice that many of your tweaks are identical to mine. Mine are in the form of .reg files I run out of WPI. If I define the same search providers as you do, will that cause a problem? Thanks again. Enjoy, John.

[5eraph]

You're welcome.

There's no need to compress the INI, nLite 1.4.9.1 and RVMi will integrate it as is, but nLite sometimes has problems with uncompressed entries*.ini files. Compress the file for use with nLite.

I'd suggest choosing one set of search providers and deleting the other; whichever works best for you.

This post has been edited by 5eraph: 17 June 2009 - 04:43 AM

[johnhc]

5eraph, great, thanks. Enjoy, John.