bigger monitor means less scroll bars?
#1
Posted 21 February 2008 - 03:22 AM
one simple question:
bigger monitor means less scroll bars?
it's the first time I will buy monitor > 15"
I suppose it depends on resolution, but roughly? is the above statement true?
thanks
PS: big monitor would mean more eyeball movements, right? is this causing eye strain?
#2
Posted 21 February 2008 - 03:54 AM
What you will find in the market will be much better (like night and day) than your 15".
#3
Posted 21 February 2008 - 04:55 AM
colore, on Feb 21 2008, 10:22 AM, said:
I suppose it depends on resolution, but roughly? is the above statement true?
Higher resolution, less scroll bar.
Bigger monitor with same resolution (like going from 17" to 19") will only get you exactly the same but slightly bigger image with exactly the same scroll bars. Of course, if your sight is not that good and you don't use the native resolution (like you'd use 1024x768 on a 17"), having a bigger monitor could allow you to be confortable with the native and higher resolution.
#4
Posted 21 February 2008 - 05:28 PM
#5
Posted 22 February 2008 - 05:12 PM
colore, on Feb 21 2008, 04:22 AM, said:
I have two 24" monitors on my desk at work, both running 1920x1200. I've had this setup for about 3 years or so now. I have never had any sort of eye strain with this setup, even when I've had multiple applications open on both monitors for hours on end.
#6
Posted 22 February 2008 - 05:21 PM
nmX.Memnoch, on Feb 22 2008, 03:12 PM, said:
I've got two 20" monitors at 1680x1050 a piece at home... no eyestrain here either... but I still hate you.
#7
Posted 22 February 2008 - 10:04 PM
#8
Posted 22 February 2008 - 10:06 PM
As to the OP, if you run a bigger monitor at it's native resolution, yes, scroll bars should be diminished because windows can be far larger, displaying more on screen at once and thus the need to scroll less.
Having a monitor that beats 2x17" without the annoying frames of the monitors in the middle of your dual-mon display is really, really nice too. Buy the biggest LCD you can afford, you won't regret it - if you get a REALLY nice monitor, it should survive a few different PC refreshes too
#9
Posted 28 February 2008 - 10:07 AM
cluberti, on Feb 22 2008, 10:06 PM, said:
cluberti, on Feb 22 2008, 10:06 PM, said:
Dell also has a new Premium Panel Guarantee:
Quote
This post has been edited by nmX.Memnoch: 28 February 2008 - 10:09 AM
#10
Posted 28 February 2008 - 01:36 PM
nmX.Memnoch, on Feb 28 2008, 11:07 AM, said:
#11
Posted 28 February 2008 - 02:49 PM
#12
Posted 29 February 2008 - 07:15 AM
But yeah...at least that can be said for Dell. Most of them will tell you to get bent no matter how persistent you are. I've been dealing with Dell for over a decade now and I can say that I've never walked away unsatisfied. Sometimes it took being a serious PITA, but it was always resolved in the end.
#13
Posted 09 March 2008 - 04:32 AM
If this doesn't switch with an LCD then I'll stick with my 3 Dell 17" flat CRT's thank you. I used to have a Sony 24" wide screen CRT ( wdm* something ) that was great and at the time all LCD's looked like crap and did for years afterwards. Anyone have one of these at work or at home and now use a new LCD at work or home and like the LCD better? Someone offered to buy me a 19" Widescreen LCD last year for birthday but I didn't want it. Do LCD's improve like CPU chips ( Moore's Law )? Actually I forgot I do have an LCD but it's an old Sony 15" one, and I did have it as my 4th monitor but it hurts my eyes too much.
Yes, I assume ( I hope ) if you have a 30" LCD with 2 $600 cards in SLI then it will look good, but I don't want SLI even if I could afford it. But have to look into that SLI and dual monitor bug thing and see what's happening with that. Planning on selling 3-5 PC's and getting a Quad Core & ....



Help

Back to top










