MSFN Forum: Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions for Windows XP (KB94372 - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions for Windows XP (KB94372 Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   zedox 

  • XPize Darkside Author
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 706
  • Joined: 25-August 05

Posted 27 March 2008 - 11:02 AM

This seems to appear in the log after running HFSLIP but windows update is still asking for it.
It was released on the 25th March. I know it's new.

TY


#2 User is offline   Tomcat76 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 27 March 2008 - 12:23 PM

This shouldn't be too hard. The .mfl file is misplaced (it can be dealt with without hardcoding) and some processes need to be run post-installation (hopefully they work at T-13).

I'll check it out.

This post has been edited by Tomcat76: 27 March 2008 - 12:24 PM


#3 User is offline   Tomcat76 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 30 March 2008 - 07:58 PM

It's supported with test release 80331a, but you need to use this version because the one on the Download Center is too old.


*Edit*

Forgot to mention... When not slipstreaming IE7, you should also include WindowsXP-KB915865-v11-x86-ENU.exe (xmllite.dll). This is required.

This post has been edited by Tomcat76: 30 March 2008 - 09:42 PM


#4 User is offline   zedox 

  • XPize Darkside Author
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 706
  • Joined: 25-August 05

Posted 31 March 2008 - 04:15 AM

Thanks Tom, testing now :)

#5 User is offline   johndoe74 

  • MSFN Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,435
  • Joined: 12-March 06

Posted 31 March 2008 - 09:06 AM

appears to be a nonstandard filename. rename from Windows-en-US-KB943729-x86_efdad33e5b24ed93be980465bbf02e766ba329e3.exe or will hfslip accept it as is ?

#6 User is offline   zedox 

  • XPize Darkside Author
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 706
  • Joined: 25-August 05

Posted 31 March 2008 - 09:32 AM

hfslip accepts it as is...

#7 User is offline   Tomcat76 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 31 March 2008 - 09:56 AM

It doesn't really matter. Executables in HF with "Windows" in their name are treated as Type 1 hotfixes, apart from a few that are blocked or filtered out as Type 2 hotfixes.

This post has been edited by Tomcat76: 31 March 2008 - 09:58 AM


#8 User is offline   James_A 

  •  
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 152
  • Joined: 23-December 07

Posted 05 November 2008 - 03:00 PM

Now the situation is reversed. Now the file at the Download Centre http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...;displaylang=en is newer thatn the one referenced by Tomcat76.

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy