does vlite support windows server 2008?
#1
Posted 11 April 2008 - 07:24 AM
1. does vlite support windows server 2008?
2. is it true that again server 2008 (optimized for desktops) is better/faster than vista?
3. is server 2008 better/faster than 2003 (optimized for desktops)?
4. if yes, which 2008 version is best for desktops?
thanks
#2
Posted 11 April 2008 - 09:04 AM
colore, on Apr 11 2008, 08:24 AM, said:
1. does vlite support windows server 2008?
2. is it true that again server 2008 (optimized for desktops) is better/faster than vista?
3. is server 2008 better/faster than 2003 (optimized for desktops)?
4. if yes, which 2008 version is best for desktops?
thanks
There are other post about it.
Yes you can use vlite on 2008 server but it's not recommended.
2008 use the same kernel as Vista SP1 so it cannot be faster.
Take a look on 2008 server web site for more information
#4
Posted 13 April 2008 - 09:01 AM
hannubys, on Apr 11 2008, 10:04 AM, said:
colore, on Apr 11 2008, 08:24 AM, said:
1. does vlite support windows server 2008?
2. is it true that again server 2008 (optimized for desktops) is better/faster than vista?
3. is server 2008 better/faster than 2003 (optimized for desktops)?
4. if yes, which 2008 version is best for desktops?
thanks
There are other post about it.
Yes you can use vlite on 2008 server but it's not recommended.
2008 use the same kernel as Vista SP1 so it cannot be faster.
Take a look on 2008 server web site for more information
That is simply put wrong. Server 2008 is faster. The kernel is the same, however, the system is much more then a kernel. There is a LOT missing/disabled from server 2008 that has been loaded into vista for it to be User and DRM friendly.
I'm not going to get into a fight here - google for performance tests and look at the numbers. Here is one that comes up quickly.
http://exo-blog.blogspot.com/2008/03/windo...done-right.html
k thx bai
#5
Posted 13 April 2008 - 10:48 AM
#6
Posted 27 August 2008 - 07:42 PM
thanks
PS: also do I really need WAIK? (its 1.4 GB...)
This post has been edited by colore: 27 August 2008 - 07:48 PM
#7
Posted 27 August 2008 - 08:16 PM
colore, on Aug 27 2008, 09:42 PM, said:
thanks
PS: also do I really need WAIK? (its 1.4 GB...)
look http://www.msfn.org/board/x64-Server-2008-...te-t122061.html
#9
Posted 28 August 2008 - 10:27 PM
(If you had bothered to read a little bit you would find there is an easy, small way around it.)
http://www.msfn.org/board/850-MB-download-...te-t122425.html
This post has been edited by Kelsenellenelvian: 28 August 2008 - 10:29 PM
#10
Posted 29 August 2008 - 05:01 AM
Kelsenellenelvian, on Aug 28 2008, 11:27 PM, said:
(If you had bothered to read a little bit you would find there is an easy, small way around it.)
http://www.msfn.org/board/850-MB-download-...te-t122425.html
I would bother, but search for WAIK didn't return this result
thanks anyway
This post has been edited by colore: 29 August 2008 - 05:03 AM
#11
Posted 07 September 2008 - 06:02 AM
thanks
#12
Posted 13 September 2008 - 06:24 PM
#13
Posted 13 September 2008 - 08:29 PM
#14
Posted 29 June 2009 - 06:36 PM
bugmenott, on Jun 29 2009, 03:51 PM, said:
I plan on removing all the editions except for the enterprise core server edition to reduce the iso size.
Doesn't actually do much at all. Removing the versions only will not save much space because nearly every version has all of the same files...
#16
Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:38 AM
Attached File(s)
-
server1.2.ini (7.71K)
Number of downloads: 90
This post has been edited by aviv00: 02 July 2009 - 01:40 AM
#17
Posted 02 July 2009 - 03:39 AM
i'll try it as soon as possible



Help

Back to top









