[CharlesF]

MDGx, on 01 December 2009 - 11:18 AM, said:

- Autoruns 9.56 for Windows 2000/XP/2003/Vista/2008/7 [577 KB]:
http://download.sysi...es/autoruns.zip

@MDGx: your link downloads version 10.02 (not 9.56).

whatever420, on 20 December 2009 - 10:14 PM, said:

Maybe this will help...?

Error message when you try to run the Sysinternals FileMon and RegMon...

Sorry, I didn't saw your message.
No, it's not my problem
...but after a few reinstall's I got them running.

egrabrych, on 01 September 2010 - 12:26 PM, said:

And why not: Autoruns 9.57

As I said in post #30,
it seems to me that all versions after 9.12 are buggy with Windows 98,
and are not giving more information.

[egrabrych]

@CharlesF:

CharlesF, on 01 September 2010 - 02:36 PM, said:

egrabrych, on 01 September 2010 - 12:26 PM, said:

And why not: Autoruns 9.57

As I said in post #30,
it seems to me that all versions after 9.12 are buggy with Windows 98,
and are not giving more information.

I asked about Autoruns v. 9.57 because I had not noticed a difference in the results of performance in comparison to Autoruns v. 9.56. However, when I looked at the displayed information more carefully, I found out that some part of it is false. The Autoruns v. 9.56 or 9.57 DOES NOT FIND PATHS TO THE CERTAIN PROGRAMS wrongly claiming that files of these programs "does not exist". I also compared the results of performance of Autoruns v. 9.12 and Autoruns v. 8.73, version 9.12 displays more results (correct ones)!

This post has been edited by egrabrych: 04 September 2010 - 01:53 PM

[CharlesF]

egrabrych, on 04 September 2010 - 01:52 PM, said:

CharlesF, on 01 September 2010 - 02:36 PM, said:

As I said in post #30, it seems to me that all versions after 9.12 are buggy with Windows 98,
and are not giving more information.

The Autoruns v. 9.56 or 9.57 DOES NOT FIND PATHS TO THE CERTAIN PROGRAMS wrongly claiming that files of these programs "does not exist".
I also compared the results of performance of Autoruns v. 9.12 and Autoruns v. 8.73, version 9.12 displays more results (correct ones)!

Thanks to confirm this .

[jds]

CharlotteTheHarlot, on 31 August 2008 - 03:56 AM, said:

- - -

So I dug into my own archives and tested each deceased version's predecessor until I successfully found older versions that run. This list is subject to change in the event that I am missing a release! Until I hear otherwise, I believe these are the last versions running on Win9x ...

- - -

Du.exe .......... 1.0 ....... 53,248 ... 02-07-05 .... 4:43p ... ok (CMD Prompt)

As far as I can tell, DU version 1.2 (40960 bytes, 2005-10-15 2:56pm) works OK.

Aside :
Reading that only 11 utilities in the current suite are OK, it seems that the current suite is becoming more and more an irrelevance. Reading about partial loss of functionality, bloat, undesirable "phone home" features and restrictive license conditions in later versions of some utilities (that otherwise still work), leads me to think that ultimately, what will be most useful, will be a list of "best version for 9X" for these utilities. (IMHO)

Joe.

This post has been edited by jds: 24 October 2010 - 08:10 AM

[CharlotteTheHarlot]

UPDATE TO POST #1

The top post has been re-written to describe the current ZIP package suite dated: 2011-02-01..

Win9x fans will notice that ONE MORE utility no longer operates. The file LISTDLLS.EXE v3.0 fails on Win9x, so users would need to use v2.25 instead.

-CTH-

[CharlotteTheHarlot]

UPDATE TO POST #1

The top post has been re-written to describe the current ZIP package suite dated: 2011-05-03..

Win9x fans will notice no functional changes among the very few remaining compatible utilities distributed in the Suite.

-CTH-

[herbalist]

Does anyone know of a 98 compatible freeware alternative to Sysinternals TDImon that has filtering ability? Filtering is disabled in the free version

[CharlotteTheHarlot]

UPDATE TO POST #1

The top post has been re-written to describe the current ZIP package suite dated: 2011-09-20..

Win9x fans will notice that ONE more utility no longer operates.

-CTH-

[CharlotteTheHarlot]

UPDATE TO POST #1

The top post has been re-written to describe the current ZIP package suite dated: 2012-04-16..

Win9x fans will notice that ONE more utility no longer operates.

-CTH-

[CharlotteTheHarlot]

UPDATE TO POST #1

The top post has been re-written to describe the current ZIP package suite dated: 2012-08-03.

Win9x fans will notice that ONE more utility no longer operates.

-CTH-

[loblo]

What about OpenList, TDIMon, VCMon and VxdMon?

[CharlotteTheHarlot]

loblo, on 06 August 2012 - 05:11 AM, said:

What about OpenList, TDIMon, VCMon and VxdMon?

They are not distributed in the Suite (nor do they appear on the All Utilitites page). The top post dates to the fall of 2008 when VS2008 was being used to recompile the utilities and they began to fail on Win9x.

If you can create a list of the missing utilities from the earlier days I will dig them up from my own archives and others, and write a little section about them. I had meant to do this eventually. Thanks for reminding me.

-CTH-

This post has been edited by CharlotteTheHarlot: 06 August 2012 - 02:33 PM

[Yushatak]

Thanks for doing the work of keeping track of this, it saves me (and I'm sure others) lots of time!

Look forward to you integrating more utilities into the list as mentioned above.

This post has been edited by Yushatak: 10 August 2012 - 08:59 PM

[CharlotteTheHarlot]

Over on the RegCompact for Win9x I have noted a possible bug in Process Explorer which I don't recall seeing before. Perhaps some others might try to reproduce it?

You will need to also have IrfanView and RegCompact present with the former, or, the former *and* the latter already running to experience the bug.

These were the result of my testing ...

; ProcExp version that never crashed ...
2005-08-22 - 13:29 ... 1,238,544 ... Procexp.exe v09.25

; ProcExp versions that crashed at launch when both IrfanView and RegCompact were already open ...
2006-02-09 - 13:53 ... 1,443,392 ... Procexp.exe v10.04
2006-02-22 - 15:31 ... 1,455,680 ... Procexp.exe v10.06
2006-05-10 - 16:28 ... 3,266,112 ... Procexp.exe v10.10
2006-05-11 - 10:38 ... 3,266,112 ... Procexp.exe v10.11
2006-07-12 - 12:59 ... 3,278,400 ... Procexp.exe v10.20
2006-11-01 - 14:07 ... 3,623,736 ... Procexp.exe v10.21

; ProcExp versions that crashed at launch when IrfanView was already open ...
2007-09-01 - 08:16 ... 3,585,408 ... Procexp.exe v11.00
2007-09-09 - 12:11 ... 3,589,160 ... Procexp.exe v11.01
2007-09-14 - 13:29 ... 3,589,160 ... Procexp.exe v11.02
2007-10-25 - 16:12 ... 3,609,640 ... Procexp.exe v11.03
2007-11-05 - 07:54 ... 3,564,584 ... Procexp.exe v11.04
2008-02-26 - 10:49 ... 3,654,696 ... Procexp.exe v11.10
2008-02-27 - 13:05 ... 3,654,696 ... Procexp.exe v11.11

So in other words, with just IrfanView running and then launching ProcExp v11.0 to 11.11 the bug occurs and ProcExp crashes.

For ProcExp versions 10.04 to 10.21 both IrfanView and RegCompact needed to be open to cause the crash. There may be more complex combinations that cause this crash as well.

[TmEE]

10.01 seems to work with Recompact and Irfanview together :
http://tiido.rocketc...SeemsToWork.png

...?

[CharlotteTheHarlot]

TmEE, on 22 September 2012 - 11:33 AM, said:

10.01 seems to work with Recompact and Irfanview together :
http://tiido.rocketc...SeemsToWork.png

...?

On Win9x?

Is there definitely a v10.01? Could you post or PM me a link because I must be missing it!

[TmEE]

Win98SE.

The file says 10.01 in properies aswell, anyway the link is here : http://tiido.rocketc...%20Explorer.exe

[CharlotteTheHarlot]

TmEE, on 22 September 2012 - 04:16 PM, said:

Win98SE.

The file says 10.01 in properies aswell, anyway the link is here : http://tiido.rocketc...%20Explorer.exe

Okay thanks! Interesting because that version I cannot locate anywhere. It nearly matches my 10.04, same size, but dated one day earlier.

So what is the skin you got there on Win9x? Looks like a cross between Royale Noir and Metallic Shades

EDIT: typo

This post has been edited by CharlotteTheHarlot: 22 September 2012 - 06:41 PM

[PROBLEMCHYLD]

Seems to be a Process Explorer 10.02. I haven't found it yet.

This post has been edited by PROBLEMCHYLD: 22 September 2012 - 07:59 PM

[CharlotteTheHarlot]

PROBLEMCHYLD, on 22 September 2012 - 07:59 PM, said:

Seems to be a Process Explorer 10.02. I haven't found it yet.

Me neither. And I have looked.

Here is the current list I have archived ( not counting a few special 64-bit versions, and maybe a couple of the latest which I didn't archive yet ) ...
2001-07-27 ... 08:10 ..... 176,128 ... ProcExp.exe_0510
2002-01-17 ... 05:40 ..... 180,224 ... ProcExp.exe_0523
2002-08-02 ... 10:16 ..... 192,512 ... ProcExp.exe_0525
2003-06-01 ... 10:12 ..... 217,088 ... ProcExp.exe_0603_(2003-06-01)
2003-06-06 ... 08:42 ..... 229,376 ... ProcExp.exe_0603_(2003-06-06)
2003-09-18 ... 08:31 ..... 237,568 ... ProcExp.exe_0702
2003-10-25 ... 06:07 ..... 299,008 ... ProcExp.exe_0800
2003-11-08 ... 16:44 ..... 303,104 ... ProcExp.exe_0803
2003-11-21 ... 15:18 ..... 340,023 ... ProcExp.exe_0810
2004-01-12 ... 22:45 ..... 487,479 ... ProcExp.exe_0820
2004-03-02 ... 09:53 ..... 512,055 ... ProcExp.exe_0832
2004-03-10 ... 17:25 ..... 520,247 ... ProcExp.exe_0833
2004-03-19 ... 06:17 ..... 520,247 ... ProcExp.exe_0834
2004-04-06 ... 07:23 ..... 520,247 ... ProcExp.exe_0835
2004-05-24 ... 23:05 ..... 536,631 ... ProcExp.exe_0840
2004-06-28 ... 09:06 ..... 536,631 ... ProcExp.exe_0841
2004-09-27 ... 11:13 ..... 548,919 ... ProcExp.exe_0850
2004-10-02 ... 12:42 ..... 548,919 ... ProcExp.exe_0852
2004-12-03 ... 16:01 ..... 561,207 ... ProcExp.exe_0860
2004-12-21 ... 15:06 ..... 561,207 ... ProcExp.exe_0861
2005-02-09 ... 06:25 ..... 456,208 ... ProcExp.exe_0900
2005-04-05 ... 09:26 ..... 456,208 ... ProcExp.exe_0903
2005-05-27 ... 20:34 ... 1,242,640 ... ProcExp.exe_0911
2005-06-15 ... 12:41 ... 1,242,640 ... ProcExp.exe_0912
2005-08-22 ... 13:29 ... 1,238,544 ... ProcExp.exe_0925
2012-09-22 ... 18:22 ... 1,443,392 ... ProcExp.exe_1001_misdated!_(2006-02-08)
2006-02-09 ... 13:53 ... 1,443,392 ... ProcExp.exe_1004
2006-02-22 ... 15:31 ... 1,455,680 ... ProcExp.exe_1006
2006-05-10 ... 16:28 ... 3,266,112 ... ProcExp.exe_1010
2006-05-11 ... 10:38 ... 3,266,112 ... ProcExp.exe_1011
2006-07-12 ... 12:59 ... 3,278,400 ... ProcExp.exe_1020
2006-11-01 ... 14:07 ... 3,623,736 ... ProcExp.exe_1021
2007-09-01 ... 08:16 ... 3,585,408 ... ProcExp.exe_1100
2007-09-09 ... 12:11 ... 3,589,160 ... ProcExp.exe_1101
2007-09-14 ... 13:29 ... 3,589,160 ... ProcExp.exe_1102
2007-10-25 ... 16:12 ... 3,609,640 ... ProcExp.exe_1103
2007-11-05 ... 07:54 ... 3,564,584 ... ProcExp.exe_1104
2008-02-26 ... 10:49 ... 3,654,696 ... ProcExp.exe_1110
2008-02-27 ... 13:05 ... 3,654,696 ... ProcExp.exe_1111_(Last-Win9x)
2008-04-04 ... 14:55 ... 3,522,072 ... ProcExp.exe_1112
2008-04-15 ... 08:09 ... 3,523,624 ... ProcExp.exe_1113
2008-05-28 ... 09:52 ... 3,522,600 ... ProcExp.exe_1120
2008-08-06 ... 17:27 ... 3,520,552 ... ProcExp.exe_1121
2008-11-18 ... 13:15 ... 3,549,552 ... ProcExp.exe_1130
2008-12-10 ... 14:40 ... 3,549,552 ... ProcExp.exe_1131
2009-01-09 ... 09:12 ... 3,550,064 ... ProcExp.exe_1132
2009-02-03 ... 10:32 ... 3,550,592 ... ProcExp.exe_1133
2010-03-24 ... 14:00 ... 3,925,880 ... ProcExp.exe_1200
2010-04-01 ... 11:26 ... 3,939,704 ... ProcExp.exe_1201
2010-04-12 ... 17:46 ... 3,905,400 ... ProcExp.exe_1202
2010-04-15 ... 08:01 ... 3,879,288 ... ProcExp.exe_1203
2010-06-07 ... 16:16 ... 3,887,480 ... ProcExp.exe_1204
2010-11-15 ... 11:45 ... 4,155,256 ... ProcExp.exe_1400
2010-11-22 ... 10:59 ... 4,177,272 ... ProcExp.exe_1401
2011-03-14 ... 12:52 ... 3,404,136 ... ProcExp.exe_1410
2011-05-02 ... 12:40 ... 3,412,856 ... ProcExp.exe_1411
2011-05-17 ... 12:48 ... 3,412,856 ... ProcExp.exe_1412
2011-07-07 ... 13:28 ... 4,754,224 ... ProcExp.exe_1500
2011-07-25 ... 12:40 ... 4,766,000 ... ProcExp.exe_1501
2011-08-15 ... 13:23 ... 4,768,032 ... ProcExp.exe_1502
2011-08-17 ... 11:35 ... 4,768,032 ... ProcExp.exe_1503
2011-08-31 ... 15:16 ... 4,846,880 ... ProcExp.exe_1504
2011-09-19 ... 10:36 ... 4,845,856 ... ProcExp.exe_1505
2011-12-02 ... 12:15 ... 4,755,768 ... ProcExp.exe_1510
2011-12-13 ... 15:54 ... 4,757,312 ... ProcExp.exe_1511
2012-01-10 ... 14:36 ... 4,763,456 ... ProcExp.exe_1512
2012-02-14 ... 14:10 ... 4,777,280 ... ProcExp.exe_1513
2012-06-05 ... 17:39 ... 2,674,800 ... ProcExp.exe_1520
2012-06-26 ... 13:01 ... 2,691,184 ... ProcExp.exe_1521
2012-07-11 ... 17:38 ... 2,691,192 ... ProcExp.exe_1522