[willydejoe1234]

update root certificates
rootsupd.exe v.6.0.2600.0 september 2009
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...49-a00e01e22f17

[Tomalak]

Hello Muppet Hunter,

There is a more recent version available of muauth.cab Could you please update your list accordingly? Please note that this file in HFCABS still does not solve the issue described as item no. 10 in this post of me.

[Muppet Hunter]

@ Tomalak

Thanks for that, I'll include it when the next patch Tuesday comes around.

@ willydejoe1234

I think your link is probably the same file that is directly linked to on the hfslip updates page (which contains files from 24 August 2009).

[willydejoe1234]

Now if
when I told him no

[billtodd]

While doing a cursory (and not yet complete) cross-check against the Win2K update list that I've built up over the years I noticed that the MS09-037 ATL update in August seemed to affect 4 different components (OE, MP, ATL, and DHTML), only one patch for which (the OE one - KB973354) seems to be included in the Win2K hotfix list (i.e., KBs 973869, 973507, and 973540 don't appear in the list). Since this is my first encounter with HFSLIP and since the patches are so recent and so easy to apply manually I don't plan to include those missing three (just in case one or more should go somewhere other than in \HF), but thought I should mention it just in case the omission was inadvertent (rather than due to my misunderstanding what should have been included).

It also seems to me that KB969805 may only apply to server editions of Win2K, but I could just be confused there as well. This isn't meant to be critical: I really appreciate this tool and wish I had taken the plunge years ago.

- bill

[tommyp]

Thanks Bill. I'll roll those changes into the w2k list, expect it sometime after patch tuesday.

[Tomalak]

Hello Muppet Hunter,

Another update. I vaguely remember reporting once something very similar (only a minor difference in otherwise very similars URLs for two different files), but I cannot find that again... STUPID STUPID STUPID MICROSOFT!

Please change the link for "muweb_site.cab" from this one:
http://update.microsoft.com/microsoftupdat.../muweb_site.cab
to this one:
http://www.update.microsoft.com/microsoftu.../muweb_site.cab

Look almost identical? Only an additional "www"? Yes, that's right! But they refer totally different files. The first one is from 2008/10/17 and contains version 7.2.6001.788 of the MU ActiveX control, whereas the second is from 2009/08/07 and contains version 7.4.7600.226. Using this most recent file, MU was satisfied on first run in Internet Explorer...
I HATE THAT! DO THOSE F****** GUYS IN REDMOND KNOW WHAT THEY DO SOMETIMES?

Thanks for correcting the link in the update list!

Kind regards,
Tomalak

[fdv]

Patch Tuesday... I hear it's literally a new record for bugs addressed... Should be interesting.

[Muppet Hunter]

@ Tomalak

Thanks, I'll get the wu link changed. Good work on solving the MSI 4.5 issue, I'll update the info on that too

@ fdv

It looks like I picked the wrong day to quit smoking

[Muppet Hunter]

*** Edit - WMP9 will be included for now for those wanting a vanilla install of XP ***

If there are no objections I'm going to remove the reference to WMP9 hotfixes to make things simpler. The line will be changed to :-

If you do not slipstream the WMP11 installer, you do not need the WMP11 hotfixes

This post has been edited by Muppet Hunter: 23 October 2009 - 05:54 PM

[tommyp]

Muppet - if slipstreaming the msi v4.5, there are no other files to include other than the installer obviously. The new rev o slipstreams this now. You can thank Tomalak for testing out various betas and providing constructive criticism.

[Muppet Hunter]

TommyP - I'll add a note to the MSI entry pointing out the new beta and remove the link to that regfile.

[billtodd]

One more note that may just reflect some misunderstanding on my part: I can't find LegitCheckControl.* anywhere on my Win2K system and it runs Windows Update just fine, so that may not be required (nor is the Malicious Software Removal Tool; the Agent and - I think - the BITS updates are required, though).

I'd also feel more comfortable knowing why patches to Remote Desktop Connection like KB958470 don't appear in the list (is it just because no one in their right mind would enable it?).

Thanks (again),

- bill

This post has been edited by billtodd: 13 October 2009 - 11:01 PM

[Fudeba]

New updates from 12/ago/2009 and 13/ago/2009 for Windows 2000 Professional:

KB953297
KB974455
KB971110
KB890830
KB953300
KB973525
KB954155
KB974112
KB958869
KB969059
KB971486
KB974571
KB971108

This post has been edited by Fudeba: 14 October 2009 - 12:40 AM

[tommyp]

Billtodd - sometimes legitcheckcontrol is used to download special nonessential hotfixes/files that people think are critical and essential. Normally it would reside in the sys32 folder. But if you need it in a bind, just extract the cab to your desktop, register the dll, download your file, unregister the dll and delete the dll.

This post has been edited by tommyp: 14 October 2009 - 04:01 AM

[billtodd]

Thanks for such a prompt monthly update - now that everything is officially blessed I'll give it another shot to see if WU agrees that it's all there.

(KB973346 appears in the deleted-files section but doesn't seem to have been removed from the main list.)

- bill

[billtodd]

Is it possible that some of the newest updates didn't include whatever it takes for Windows Update to recognize that they've been applied? 954155, 968816, 973540, 971633, and 952069 are listed as missing despite the fact that I included them in my \HF input to HFSLIP.

The (optional) root certificates update (also included) came up missing as well. Is this expected behavior (I think I've seen that happen after I manually installed that update)?

Several WMP 6.4 updates are listed as missing despite the fact that I slipstreamed in WMP9. I realize that I can probably just ignore them (unless somehow WMP 6.4 is still lurking in my system somewhere and creating a latent vulnerability if I leave it defenseless), but is this expected behavior from HFSLIP (I tried to search this topic for '6.4' but for some reason just kept getting sent to the main forum page)?

I tend just to ignore updates to things like Remote Desktop Connection, Message Queue, and Active Directory that I never plan to use (or even install), which sometimes leads to strangeness (e.g., 937894 listed as missing but not the more recent 951071 which replaced it or the even more recent 971032 which replaced that). Should this be any cause for concern?

Pure curiosity question: 926122 is listed as missing - a server update which I really wouldn't expect my ancient ThinkPad 570E would require. I remember seeing that pop up missing on one other desktop system once, and never on any others: anyone have any idea why?

Thanks for any insights,

- bill

This post has been edited by billtodd: 15 October 2009 - 12:30 AM

[-X-]

I notice most of those are WMP updates. Could HFSLIP suffer from the same limitations I posted about here: http://www.msfn.org/board/nlite-bug-slipst...tml#entry881771 ?

To fix this issue, I just place the correct WMP9 version files in i386.

WMP 6.4 is not removed when you add a newer version of WMP.

[billtodd]

Thanks - I feel kind of silly for not having noticed this after noticing the WMP 6.4 pattern. But there's still the DX9 update that also didn't get found (and doesn't seem to contain multiple files), and that dates back to August. In any event, it's not hard to install the few offending updates manually now that I know which ones they are (perhaps the HFSLIP instructions and contents could change to reflect this).

Having been pestered by Windows Update about WMP 6.4 updates in the past I do understand that installing WMP 9 does not normally remove WMP 6.4, but since HFSLIP in fact does replace files in \i386 and the driver .cab file (and since the HFSLIP instructions emphasize that you should not include WMP 6.4 patches if you've slipstreamed WMP 9) I had tentatively assumed that HFSLIP removed WMP 6.4 when it installed WMP 9 (though in fact HFSLIP refers to WMP 7 rather than 6.4). Since the behavior of WMP in this area differs from that of replacement-style upgrades to IE, OE, and DX, perhaps the instructions could clarify that.

- bill

[tommyp]

WM hotfixes are troublesome. The microsoft software clowns don't seem to pack the WM hotfixes in the same manner, they like to rename folders with a unique naming scheme for no rhyme or reason. I'll have to trouble shoot these over the weekend.