[Muppet Hunter]

Sorry for the delay, see the attachment for the October changes until fdv puts up the new page.

Attached File(s)

•  Oct_hotfixes.txt (3.53K)
  Number of downloads: 65

[willydejoe1234]

KB958869 for GDI+ replaces kb938464v.2
KB975467
KB971486 replaces kb956572
kb969059
KB974571
kb973525 ActiveX Killbits - replaces KB973346
kb974455 replaces 972260 (i.e versions 7 and 8 independent)
kb974112 replaces kb954600
kb975025
kb954155
kb890830 v3.0


I think they are these

please update the post from October 2009 to xp

This post has been edited by willydejoe1234: 27 October 2009 - 07:28 PM

[fdv]

MH, did you email this to me? I dont have the file...

[bfc_xxx]

On october 28 I got 2 new updates on windows update:

IE8-WindowsXP-KB975364-x86
WindowsXP-KB971513-x86

but I cannot find them on Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary. Can anyone help if I have to delete older updates?

[wela]

KB971513 this is an optional Update, nothing to delete.

[gluon]

KB976749 for IE8 is up to fix previous cumulative update. From the description it seems like the previous cumulative update kb974455 need to be installed first otherwise there could be issues.

I'm trying it now, putting it in HF folder.... hopefully everything is OK.

[bfc_xxx]

I tried with latest beta and WU seems satisfied. No problems.

edit: how can I see if an update has been really installed and there is no conflict with other update?

This post has been edited by bfc_xxx: 05 November 2009 - 05:52 AM

[fdv]

I guess I need a new contributor for the XP list...

No hard feelings if you're reading this, Mup, but we've gotta keep moving forward... any takers?

Tom and I will help any new taker until they get on their feet.

The faster someone steps forward, the easier this will be.

[Mim0]

New (2009-11-10):
Windows® Malicious Software Removal Tool (KB890830)
MS09-065 (969947) replaces MS09-025 (968537)
MS09-066 (973309) replaces MS09-018 (971055)

fdv, on Nov 10 2009, 04:28 AM, said:

I guess I need a new contributor for the XP list...

I can offer my XP-List.

Mimo

This post has been edited by Mim0: 10 November 2009 - 03:28 PM

[tommyp]

Wow! That was fast. FDV, looks like we got a taker, and we have German precision to make it perfect too. Thanks for stepping up to the plate Mimo!

FDV, can you link to this list? Or host it for Mimo? Either way is fine with me. I'll update the hfslip site so that it points to the right place for XP lists once it's all settled.

Sorry muppet , but a one time update of a list doesn't cut it.

[fdv]

Perfection.

List linked.

BTW Hi TommyP! long time no talk to

[Kiki Burgh]

thanks for the list mimo ... i am trying to get back to slipstreaming after quite sometime ... just some items that i need clarification on:

(1) WindowsXP-KB971276-v3-x86-ENU.exe links to german update
(2) UPHClean-Setup.msi already has a beta (but is tagged as ver 2)
(3) WindowsMedia11-KB939683-x86-ENU & WindowsXP-KB914440-v12-x86-ENU show in kb articles as for XP SP2 only
(4) do i need both RDCs: KB958469 & KB956744?
(5) is WindowsXP-WindowsMedia-KB973540-x86-ENU not needed anymore?
(6) would the last column in table 7 suggest downloading some that superseded those in the 1st column? (my apologies but i have not cross-checked possible duplicate among the listed files yet)

any feedback will be greatly appreciated.

hello to everyone!

This post has been edited by Kiki Burgh: 11 November 2009 - 08:05 AM

[Kiki Burgh]

willydejoe1234, on Oct 24 2009, 08:08 AM, said:

KB971486 replaces kb956572

hello willydejoe! just wanted to clarify this ... i checked on the ms-bulletin & it shows 959454 as the update replaced instead. i might have missed something though. thanks!

[Mim0]

@Kiki Burgh

Thank you reporting errors and things which are not clear enough!!!

> (1) WindowsXP-KB971276-v3-x86-ENU.exe links to german update
THX, i will correct it!

> (2) UPHClean-Setup.msi already has a beta (but is tagged as ver 2)
Don't understand... I took that info but I don't use it by myself. I thought it was 1.6d.

> (3) WindowsMedia11-KB939683-x86-ENU & WindowsXP-KB914440-v12-x86-ENU show in kb articles as for XP SP2 only
For KB939683 you found that info on the download-page not in the KB article. The download-page is from 2007. So don't be confused that there was SP2. But mainly WMP11 is important!
For KB914440 it's th same. This tool is from 2006.

> (4) do i need both RDCs: KB958469 & KB956744?
No! If you don't update RDC you take 5.2, otherwise the other one!

> (5) is WindowsXP-WindowsMedia-KB973540-x86-ENU not needed anymore?
It is needed. It's listed in table 2 (sec upd) 2009-08/MS09-037

> (6) would the last column in table 7 suggest downloading some that superseded those in the 1st column? (my apologies but i have not cross-checked possible duplicate among the listed files yet)
table 7 is only information. All what is necessary do download is listed above!

I will correct the list this evening...

CU, Mimo

---- EDIT ----
(1) is corrected
(4) theres now an extra hint between tables 1 and 2 for RDC. Also where to take care (in table 2), the hints are now bold.

This post has been edited by Mim0: 11 November 2009 - 01:20 PM

[Kiki Burgh]

great! thanks for the clarification Mim0 ... this list will truly help me get back on track.
btw, is mdac 2.8 not needed (& if so where does it reside)?

This post has been edited by Kiki Burgh: 11 November 2009 - 11:12 PM

[Mim0]

Kiki Burgh, on Nov 12 2009, 03:35 AM, said:

great! thanks for the clarification Mim0 ... this list will truly help me get back on track.
btw, is mdac 2.8 not needed (& if so where does it reside)?

MDAC 2.8 is not needed as separate setup because MDAC 2.8 SP1 is included in SP2 and SP3 for XP (I think MDAC 2.8 SP2 is not available for XP). You can use this Component Checker to verífy what MDAC is installed (of course it should be 2.8 SP1).

Regards, Mimo

[Ambassador]

Hey Mimo. You have Windows Genuine "Annoyance" Notifications listed under "Required to access Windows Update". It isn't needed (and concerning the controversal nature of this update, the less people accidentally install the update, the better).

[Lilla]

RE: Mimo's Windows XP Service Pack 3 update-list
Last Check: 2009, November, 11; Last Update: 2009, November, 11; HFSLIP 1.7.9 (final)

Table 2.
QUESTION: I downloaded file WindowsXP-KB968389-x86-ENU.exe to include in HFSLIP. I checked and found that it is currently installed on my computer; this was done by Windows Updates.

But, should I: 1) use WindowsXP_KB968389_x86.reg, or 2) should I modify it to match my current reg entries, or 3) don't include a .reg file at all? I am a home user.

WindowsXP_KB968389_x86.reg (linked to by MiMo)
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa]
"LmCompatibilityLevel"=dword:00000003
"SuppressExtendedProtection"=dword:00000000

My current registry entries:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa]
"LmCompatibilityLevel"=dword:00000000
<the Suppress... entry is not listed>


Table 6. There is no download link for CDIMAGE.exe. I read that CDIMAGE is an internal Microsoft Tool. In any event, I was able to download CDIMAGE v2.52 from http://elitezoom.com/8-step-to-make-bootab...-vista-dvd.html

Table 11. MuCatalogWebControl.cab is listed twice. Once with description Microsoft Update Engine, and again with description Office Update Engine. Is this as intended?

Thank you very much for all of your hard work! I think you did an amazing job of organizing and linking all of these updates. I really appreciate it. I'm pretty technical, but figuring out these updates and what replaces what is beyond me. I've been using HFSLIP for several years now to use on family/friend installs. I love HFSLIP.

Lilla

This post has been edited by Lilla: 16 November 2009 - 10:20 PM

[Mim0]

Lilla, on Nov 17 2009, 04:57 AM, said:

Table 2.
QUESTION: I downloaded file WindowsXP-KB968389-x86-ENU.exe to include in HFSLIP. I checked and found that it is currently installed on my computer; this was done by Windows Updates.

But, should I: 1) use WindowsXP_KB968389_x86.reg, or 2) should I modify it to match my current reg entries, or 3) don't include a .reg file at all? I am a home user.

I don't no I read the KB-article and think it cannot be wrong to have it activated. But I'm not sure if it's really necessary... And how to set the registry-entries? You find the info in the KB-article. I have a batch which I start manually after installation to set many registry-values for my personal needs. Sorry, that I can't give you a better hint.

Quote

Table 6. There is no download link for CDIMAGE.exe. I read that CDIMAGE is an internal Microsoft Tool. In any event, I was able to download CDIMAGE v2.52 from http://elitezoom.com...-vista-dvd.html

Cool! THX for the link!!!

Quote

Table 11. MuCatalogWebControl.cab is listed twice. Once with description Microsoft Update Engine, and again with description Office Update Engine. Is this as intended?

I took these lists from the Windows XP Service Pack 3 Hotfixes. I don't use these updates, I haven't verified them. Hopefully someone other can answer you.

Regards, Mimo

(page-upload will follow this evening.)

This post has been edited by Mim0: 17 November 2009 - 12:11 AM

[Muppet Hunter]

Lilla, on Nov 17 2009, 03:57 AM, said:

QUESTION: I downloaded file WindowsXP-KB968389-x86-ENU.exe to include in HFSLIP. I checked and found that it is currently installed on my computer; this was done by Windows Updates.

But, should I: 1) use WindowsXP_KB968389_x86.reg, or 2) should I modify it to match my current reg entries, or 3) don't include a .reg file at all?

Since you don't have an entry for SuppressExtendedProtection then you need to apply the regfile if you want to enable Extended Protection for Authentication; your LmCompatibilityLevel should be 3 anyway from a security perspective, regardless of whether you enable Extended Protection.

This update looks like it was backported from Windows 7 and to me looks like it's worth installing as it's strongly recommended.

http://blogs.technet.com/msrc/pages/monthl...ugust-2009.aspx

Q: KB968389 was listed as a critical update from within Windows Server Update Service (WSUS). However, the article states that it is a "security update". Just wondering if there are any vulnerabilities if this update is NOT applied?

A: This is a non-security update which does not directly address any vulnerabilities. Not installing this update does not leave your system unprotected against a specific vulnerability. However, this update will allow applications to make use of Extended Protection for Authentication, which is a new functionality that offers more robust protection of authentication credentials. While there is no immediate difference after installing the update, we strongly recommend installing this update so third party applications and Windows components will be able to make use of this strengthened authentication technology. To learn more about Extended Protection for Authentication, we recommend reviewing Security Advisory 973811 for more information on this technology.