Opera 10 Have you tried it yet?
#1
Posted 18 December 2008 - 07:31 PM
Thanks.
#2
Posted 19 December 2008 - 03:06 AM
But it runs fine. So far the only problem I have seen is a font problem in the Transfers window. All numbers (download size, -speed) are just greek.
(Take that, Mozilla, OpenOffice.org and AbiWord!)
This post has been edited by Mijzelf: 19 December 2008 - 03:08 AM
#3
Posted 19 December 2008 - 09:12 AM
I am planning to install Windows 98 OEM on my old computer and with Opera 10 passing the ACID3 test (100%) I do not need to bother with Firefox as an alternative anymore when browsing Ebay.
#4
Posted 20 December 2008 - 07:00 AM
#5
Posted 20 December 2008 - 05:20 PM
BenoitRen, on Dec 20 2008, 08:00 AM, said:
Opera has been my primary browser since 2001. The only reason I kept Firefox this long was due to Opera having difficulty organizing pictures properly on Ebay. Whether Acid 3 plays a factor or not, I am happy Opera remedied the problem.
#6
Posted 21 December 2008 - 01:59 AM
This isn't much of a big deal since I can use Firefox to upload media. Myspace's no-frills uploader tends to crap out/time out and isn't all that consistent at times. There are more sites that are starting to employ these java parts to pages and I'm hoping Opera can work out the issue.
#7
Posted 21 December 2008 - 09:03 AM
#8
Posted 22 December 2008 - 03:38 AM
#9
Posted 22 December 2008 - 04:36 AM
only problem was with the webpage service.futuremark.com.
try to find some 3dmark results and you will see, but the page itself is a nightmare. also opera requires new installation of Java if you want to use javascripted pages... IE6 with Slimbrowser prevailed because its java support is older but better than new one. newer java seemed to me as big trouble - i had to remove it from system...
i guess i will try Opera 10 but i am skeptic since i had no trouble with slimbrowser.
#10
Posted 22 December 2008 - 04:42 AM
#11
Posted 22 December 2008 - 05:21 AM
"Offler" said:
Java is not the same thing as JavaScript!
#12
Posted 22 December 2008 - 05:27 AM
Shan_blender, on Dec 22 2008, 11:42 AM, said:
Care to share some data?
Are there more recent tests?
http://nontroppo.org.../kestrel_tests/
http://celtickane.co...peedarchive.php
Or are you talking of "pure" javascript speed?
http://ejohn.org/blo...rmance-rundown/
http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/09/03/google...-js-speed-test/
It seems like latest 10 Alpha is much faster in them too:
http://www.download....0113913-12.html
However, I guess that the small differences in tests cannot really be appreciated in "real life" use, and choosing one over the other should be made over a "personal feeling" rather than on benchmark data....
jaclaz
#13
Posted 22 December 2008 - 05:49 AM
jaclaz, on Dec 22 2008, 06:27 AM, said:
Shan_blender, on Dec 22 2008, 11:42 AM, said:
Care to share some data?
Are there more recent tests?
http://nontroppo.org.../kestrel_tests/
http://celtickane.co...peedarchive.php
Or are you talking of "pure" javascript speed?
http://ejohn.org/blo...rmance-rundown/
http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/09/03/google...-js-speed-test/
It seems like latest 10 Alpha is much faster in them too:
http://www.download....0113913-12.html
However, I guess that the small differences in tests cannot really be appreciated in "real life" use, and choosing one over the other should be made over a "personal feeling" rather than on benchmark data....
jaclaz
No , I mean in every things. Take the exemple of loading a Flash Component! To see the flash controls, you must click on the Animation! This is crapy. FIREFOX POWA, PLUS...I have some experience in Browser..Opera is 50% slow than IE and FIrefox..trust me. And to finish, see the title of your Download.com document ! Just the title
This post has been edited by Shan_blender: 22 December 2008 - 05:53 AM
#14
Posted 22 December 2008 - 05:57 AM
#15
Posted 22 December 2008 - 06:07 AM
EDIT: Yes, it is!
Quote
While a Pentium level processor is recommended, K-Meleon can run on 486 systems that meet the minimum RAM requirements. Please consult the release notes for particular versions of K-Meleon.
Users of Windows 2000 may experience problems due to the absence of msvcp60.dll. Install the Windows 2000 Support Tools from your setup CD or consult the Windows Update website.
Users of Windows 95, Windows 98 and Windows NT 4.0 may have to install Vcredist.exe to get the latest run-time components for Visual C++ applications.
Users of Windows 95 may also have to install shlwapi.dll (part of Internet Explorer).
This post has been edited by e-berlin: 22 December 2008 - 06:10 AM
#16
Posted 22 December 2008 - 06:15 AM
Shan_blender, on Dec 22 2008, 12:49 PM, said:
Sorry for being not able to fulfill your wishes
When I'll see some data I may.
Of course, as long it is your personal opinion on the matter, I will hold it in the greatest consideration.
Blade Runner said:
kind of innuendo.
jaclaz
#17
Posted 22 December 2008 - 08:31 AM
jaclaz, on Dec 22 2008, 06:15 AM, said:
Shan_blender, on Dec 22 2008, 12:49 PM, said:
Sorry for being not able to fulfill your wishes
When I'll see some data I may.
Of course, as long it is your personal opinion on the matter, I will hold it in the greatest consideration.
Blade Runner said:
kind of innuendo.
jaclaz
You know, I don't care if you don't "trust"me. I don't think i'm important in your life. But, I'm a pc user since I was 5. So please, do not tell me those cr**@
#18
Posted 22 December 2008 - 08:44 AM
Shan_blender, on Dec 22 2008, 03:31 PM, said:
Take it easy
I now see
jaclaz
#19
Posted 22 December 2008 - 09:17 AM
jaclaz, on Dec 22 2008, 09:44 AM, said:
jaclaz
I don't know what happen to the Windows 98/95 forum lately. The hostility I've seen these days when others choose not to follow the trend and set their own goes against the whole meaning of using Windows 1998 much less 95 in 2008.
Is it that hard for them to understand that everyone has their own needs when surfing the Internet thus, opinions will vary as well?
#20
Posted 23 December 2008 - 01:08 AM
Mijzelf, on Dec 22 2008, 04:38 AM, said:
This is good advice (but what a PITA that default arrangement is!) One of the best and easiest suggestions for Opera users is to have the Browser user agent box visible at all times. Try this if you haven't already, it is well worth the 5 seconds it takes to do it.
(1) Make sure you have the Status Bar enabled (the Status Bar is the line at the bottom of the Opera window which does things like display the URL pointed to when the mouse is held over a link). If it is missing: Tools | Appearance | Toolbars and then check the box for Status Bar.
(2) Now go to: Tools | Appearance | Buttons and in the left column click Preferences.
(3) With the mouse drag the box shown as "Identify as Internet Explorer" onto the Status Bar and release. It is a dropdown box that shows the current user agent tag (browser identification) and lets you quickly change (F5 refresh whatever page you're on of course!).
Webpage slingers (aka programmers) often tie content to the browser the visitor is presumably using. For example there is a very useful site at http://www.yellowpages.com/maps which allows you to enter address/city/state/zip and see Birdseye POV maps using technology from Microsoft's Virtual Earth.
When using the default Identify as Opera this webslinger arbitrarily decided to just allow you the plain old illustrated maps with no access to the good stuff! When the user agent says: Identify as Internet Explorer, the navigational toolbar containing the compass and buttons for Aerial, Bird's Eye, etc., are present and available. I have not tried, but this may also hold true for other Microsoft Virtual Earth sites.
Memo to self: remember to berate YellowPages later for hiring a nitwit to code their site. On second thought, 5 bucks says Microsoft shipped them a template for implementing the map engine.



Help


Back to top









