MSFN Forum: Silent .NET Maker synthesized 20100118 - W2K/XP/2K3 x86 - MSFN Forum

Jump to content


Unattended CD/DVD Guide Homepage · MSFN Forum Rules

Welcome to the Applications Installs forum. Make sure you read the forum rules before you start posting.

Links/Requests to warez and/or any illegal material (porn, cracks, serials, etc..) will not be tolerated. Discussion of circumventing WGA/activation/timebombs/keygens or any other illegal activity will also not be tolerated.

We try our best to keep this forum clean of illegal content. If you see any illegal activity use the "report" button you find in every post to report the specific post to the moderators. If you ignore any of the rules you will be banned without notice.

Read Forum Rules
  • 50 Pages +
  • « First
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Silent .NET Maker synthesized 20100118 - W2K/XP/2K3 x86 Custom .NET+hotfixes+langpacks unattended installers/add-ons Rate Topic: -----

#161 User is offline   CEoCEo 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 64
  • Joined: 20-April 05

Posted 16 March 2009 - 11:32 AM

Thanks strel for your hard work on this .NET Framework mess! A real timesaver...
But please strel....add quotes to make the changes to the registry valid.
From line 315

Quote

REG ADD HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v3.0\Setup\%OSLCID% /V InstallSuccess /T REG_DWORD /D 00000001 /F
REG ADD HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v3.0\Setup\%OSLCID% /V Version /D 3.0.04506.30 /F
REG ADD HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v3.0\Setup\Windows Presentation Foundation\%OSLNGSTR% /V Version /D 3.0.6920.0 /F
to

Quote

REG ADD "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v3.0\Setup\%OSLCID%" /V InstallSuccess /T REG_DWORD /D 00000001 /F
REG ADD "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v3.0\Setup\%OSLCID%" /V Version /D 3.0.04506.30 /F
REG ADD "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v3.0\Setup\Windows Presentation Foundation\%OSLNGSTR%" /V Version /D 3.0.6920.0 /F



#162 User is offline   strel 

  • segmentation fault
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 629
  • Joined: 24-February 08
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 16 March 2009 - 12:44 PM

Sorry I should have tested it.

Fixed now! :thumbup

Thx CEoCeo.
More than this. It needed !VARIABLES! for delayed expansion.

And there were 3 lines out of place in the previous version.

#163 User is offline   CEoCEo 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 64
  • Joined: 20-April 05

Posted 16 March 2009 - 01:37 PM

Thx strel for your quick fix!
Tested and working as intended now. The KB928416 struggle is finally over. :thumbup

#164 User is offline   oioldman 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 967
  • Joined: 16-April 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64

Posted 16 March 2009 - 01:53 PM

Have used this when on x32, but have since upgraded to x64 for learning.
Was wondering, would this work for x64?

#165 User is offline   strel 

  • segmentation fault
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 629
  • Joined: 24-February 08
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 16 March 2009 - 02:13 PM

I'm almost sure is not possible at this moment.
I don't have x64 machine to adapt it, but It's probably I can have access to one soon.

#166 User is offline   oioldman 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 967
  • Joined: 16-April 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64

Posted 16 March 2009 - 02:18 PM

ok thanks, strel.
will wait with baited breath as found it really useful for x32 machine.

#167 User is offline   pcmac 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 08-February 09

Posted 16 March 2009 - 02:57 PM

strel, in the "20090316b" version WU asking for KB829019 Pt-BR

#168 User is offline   mooms 

  • What ?
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 273
  • Joined: 13-October 07

Posted 16 March 2009 - 11:03 PM

Thank you Strel, with your updated version everything is fine.

#169 User is offline   picelec 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 26
  • Joined: 06-October 04

Posted 17 March 2009 - 02:21 AM

Thanks for this :thumbup

i have DFN11fr.exe DFN20SP2fr.exe DFN30SP2fr.exe and DFN35SP1fr.exe

how to integrate it to hfslip ?

thanks

#170 User is offline   strel 

  • segmentation fault
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 629
  • Joined: 24-February 08
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 17 March 2009 - 02:43 AM

Use HFSVCPACK folder for switchless installers.

This post has been edited by strel: 17 March 2009 - 03:12 AM


#171 User is offline   Geej 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 634
  • Joined: 01-January 08
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 17 March 2009 - 03:03 AM

View Postpicelec, on Mar 17 2009, 04:21 PM, said:

Thanks for this :thumbup

i have DFN11fr.exe DFN20SP2fr.exe DFN30SP2fr.exe and DFN35SP1fr.exe

how to integrate it to hfslip ?

thanks


I'm using HFSLIP and have .net 1.1 & 2 run at T13 via HFSVCPACK
.3 & 3.5 run via RUNONCEEX or HFGUIRUNONCE

#172 User is offline   picelec 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 26
  • Joined: 06-October 04

Posted 17 March 2009 - 03:32 AM

Thanks for the fast reply, i test it ....

#173 User is offline   Angelico_Payne 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 212
  • Joined: 15-January 06

Posted 17 March 2009 - 08:43 AM

Ok let's say I want to install all .NET Framework versions 1.1-.3.5 with all SP's and hotfixes.

If I just use .cmd file to install , everything is installed properly (installation progress), but when I look after restart, it shows that e.g. SP's didnt install and some hotfixes, beacuse restart is required after installing main .NET package e.g. .NET 1.1 main package. SP's and some hotfixes show up as not being installed in add/remove section and on windows update (probly beacuse it uses same values for establishing that)

How did you address this issue - requirement of restarts, so that everything IS installed properly and displayed properly?

This post has been edited by Angelico_Payne: 17 March 2009 - 08:44 AM


#174 User is offline   strel 

  • segmentation fault
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 629
  • Joined: 24-February 08
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 17 March 2009 - 10:20 AM

You're are taking as a fact something that is not real. This supposedly needed restarts doesn't take place when you installed .NET normally with ms original files, and doesn't happen with this installers. For your serenity, this method uses administrative install technique, that is something ms implements in its installer technollogy, .msi files, that is kind of a preinstall. This method is not inventing the wheel.

About hotfixes, with this script are not showed as installed, i.e not listed in Add Remove Programs, but are identified by MBSA and win/ms update system as installed. But as you can reach the building script code and/or installing script code, you can remove this feature in one of them manually to your liking.

And SNMsynth.cmd is not used to install but to start the SMNsynth installer(s)/add-on(s) building process.

This post has been edited by strel: 17 March 2009 - 11:25 AM


#175 User is offline   TronBoRG 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 15-May 06

Posted 17 March 2009 - 10:25 AM

Thanks very much for this excellent script

#176 User is offline   antoineL 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 07-October 05

Posted 18 March 2009 - 02:18 PM

Thanks to Strel (and TC76 and all the people involved) for this useful tool.

I was trying to use only the .NET 1.1 part, and I got small pitfalls.

First, while my targets include Win2000 and Vista stations, I was building on XP64, which is seen as NT5.2 i.e. 2003 server (they share the same kernel). Even if I use WIN2K=YES in the .ini, the logic which discovers WIN2K3 according to the VER command operates, and then prevents the 1.1 installer to be built. The fix is obviously to check about the version only if there are no explicit settings in the .ini. See attached patch to this effect Attached File  VerCheck.patch.txt (1.23K)
Number of downloads: 10 (GNU unidiff, against the version 20090316b.)
I am guessing the setting WINXP=YES will do the job to build a 1.1 installer for Vista, but I do not have checked it yet.

Second, for bare bones W2k targets (SP4 w/o IE6, which only have 2.0 Windows Installer), the /passive and /quiet and /norestart switches are not acceptable. It took me quite more time to come with a acceptable patch :blushing: , which doubles the %VERBOSITY% stuff with a %QSWITCH% (either qb or qn). It is still not perfect :unsure:, since for example it enables the Cancel button (and I do not know what /passive does, but I guess it doesn't). Also I broadly replaced throughout the script, but an educated guess is taht .NET 2.0 might require Installer 3.x at least, thus making it moot. Anyway I attach it in case anyone is interested. Attached File  VerbosityMSI2.patch.txt (12.01K)
Number of downloads: 16

Much more complex was the aim to have several 1.1 language packs (of course I am thinking about servers here, or MUI-enabled workstations). I succeded at manually building an installer which does that (by manually renaming the langpack.msi after their adminstrative installation), but I did not even try to enhance the script this way. Is there any interest?

#177 User is offline   Raoul90 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 05-February 08

Posted 18 March 2009 - 04:39 PM

Hey,

I assume that all the restricted hotfixes are multilanguage?

Something else:
.NET 3.5 full redistributable package (dotnetfx35.exe 197MB)
.NET 3.5 SP1 full redistributable (dotnetfx35.exe 231 MB)

Same file names, can't put them together in one directory withouth changing the name of 1 of them?

Or does .NET 3.5 SP1 full redistributable (dotnetfx35.exe 231 MB) include everything from .NET 3.5 full redistributable package (dotnetfx35.exe 197MB) ?

#178 User is offline   strel 

  • segmentation fault
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 629
  • Joined: 24-February 08
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 18 March 2009 - 06:15 PM

Are different SP# steps of the same #.# versions. Are incompatible.

#179 User is offline   Raoul90 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 05-February 08

Posted 19 March 2009 - 07:22 AM

I am trying to make an all in one of dotnet.

I downloaded everything except:

- .NET 3.5 full redistributable package (dotnetfx35.exe 197MB), contains 2.0 SP1, 3.0 SP1 and 3.5 frameworks. 3.# frameworks are not processed for W2K installer(s)/add-on(s).

- .NET 3.5 langpack (dotnetfx35langpack_x86XX.exe -- note it has the same filename as 3.5 SP1 langpack), contains 2.0 SP1, 3.0 SP1 and 3.5 framework langpacks. 3.# framework langpacks are not processed for W2K installer(s)/add-on(s).

-All the restricted hotfixes.

If i know make the installer , I wont get anything on MU?

#180 User is offline   strel 

  • segmentation fault
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 629
  • Joined: 24-February 08
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 19 March 2009 - 07:56 AM

Those are not last versions so you're going to see KB951847 as a high priority update (including in this case 3.5 SP1 redistributable (2.0 SP2+3.0 SP2+3.5 SP1)+ hotfixes + langpacks for these versions). KB951847 fix is not applied for these versions, it's only applied if you build updated installers.

This post has been edited by strel: 19 March 2009 - 08:03 AM


Share this topic:


  • 50 Pages +
  • « First
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2013 msfn.org
Privacy Policy