The OCZ is made by FSP. The Corsair is made by Seasonic. Two quality units.
Power on the 12V rail(s) is very similar. Corsair: 52A, OCZ: 50A.
The OCZ is rated at 25°C, whereas the Corsair is rated at 50°C, so not much difference in overall power.
Both are 80plus certified, have nice cables, good protections, clean power, built from good components, etc.
Between the two, it comes down to individual choice, if one prefers one or more 12V rails (neither one is inherently better). Multiple rails is better *if* the power is split properly (which connectors on which rail), IMO. Preference in brand names too arguably (OCZ/FSP or Corsair/Seasonic).
Out of the two, I prefer the Corsair:
-more power connectors (molex/sata) which I very much need
-I'm not real keen on how power is divided (which connectors on which rail) in the OCZ, I couldn't use much of it...
-couple more amps on the 12v rail
-not real sure how much of that 700W you'd get at a "real" operating temperature in the OCZ (and it already has less power on the 12v, and less usable being split)
-the OCZ lacks OPP and OVP protections (no varistor either), which the Corsair has
-the OCZ uses Taiwanese caps (some being rated for 85°C), whereas the Corsair uses all Japanese ones (all rated for 105°C)
-the somewhat misleading "combined power" on the OCZ label (680W isn't just for the 12v rails! it says in small type 50A max elsewhere, so it's 600W) -- I absolutely HATE that stuff
-the fan on the Corsair is quieter
-I like Seasonic a little better
Doesn't mean the OCZ isn't a good unit, it's still better than like 90% of PSUs out there... But the Corsair goes to 11
In your case though, I would basically recommend neither unless the price is quite good. It's just WAY overkill. Unless you plain on upgrading to some SLI setup with two high end cards or something... Your current box would have some overhead left on a good 350W unit. They're both great PSUs though.
This post has been edited by crahak: 28 December 2008 - 02:34 PM