Jump to content

Welcome to MSFN Forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account



Photo

Poll and Discuss Defragmentation Software

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
42 replies to this topic

Poll: Defragmentation Software (78 member(s) have cast votes)

Which do you reccomend?

  1. Voted Windows Default (8 votes [10.26%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.26%

  2. Diskeeper (12 votes [15.38%])

    Percentage of vote: 15.38%

  3. Raxco PerfectDisk (14 votes [17.95%])

    Percentage of vote: 17.95%

  4. O&O Defrag (7 votes [8.97%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.97%

  5. Piriform Defraggler (5 votes [6.41%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.41%

  6. Auslogics Disk Defrag (3 votes [3.85%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.85%

  7. DiskTrix UltimateDefrag (2 votes [2.56%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.56%

  8. Sysinternals Contig / PageDefrag (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  9. JkDefrag (12 votes [15.38%])

    Percentage of vote: 15.38%

  10. UltraDefrag (2 votes [2.56%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.56%

  11. mst Defrag (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  12. Other (8 votes [10.26%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.26%

  13. Voted None (5 votes [6.41%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.41%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1
DigeratiPrime

DigeratiPrime

    MSFN Junkie

  • Patrons
  • 3,550 posts
  • Joined 18-August 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
Here is the previous topic for reference: http://www.msfn.org/...showtopic=18603

Links to software in poll:
01. http://www.microsoft.com/
02. http://www.diskeeper.com/
03. http://www.perfectdisk.com/
04. http://www.oo-software.com/
05. http://www.defraggler.com/
06. http://www.auslogics.com/disk-defrag
07. http://www.disktrix.com/
08. http://technet.micro...s/bb897428.aspx
08. http://technet.micro...s/bb897426.aspx
09. http://www.kessels.com/Jkdefrag/
10. http://ultradefrag.sourceforge.net/
11. http://www.mstsoftware.com/
Recommended Software: KeePass | Microsoft ICE | VisualWget | Vitamin D Video |


How to remove advertisement from MSFN

#2
mara-

mara-

    Office Integrator Developer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,181 posts
  • Joined 19-February 07
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
For me Diskeeper is the best. I use it more then a year and it works very good. I can really notice very good performance of my disks.

Cheers ;)

#3
Access Denied

Access Denied

    Access Denied

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 239 posts
  • Joined 19-March 04
I voted for Raxco's PerfectDisk (v10). Running it on Windows 7 right now and its great. I have not ran an offline defrag yet, but I did just make a backup. I'll give it a whirl and post back results.
Q9650 w/ P5Q PRO
4 GB DDR2 OCZ 1200

#4
DigeratiPrime

DigeratiPrime

    MSFN Junkie

  • Patrons
  • 3,550 posts
  • Joined 18-August 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
I am using Defraggler occasionally, usually after initial install. I am not sure about the performance benefits, but I can notice a reduction in seek noise :)
Recommended Software: KeePass | Microsoft ICE | VisualWget | Vitamin D Video |

#5
CoffeeFiend

CoffeeFiend

    Coffee Aficionado

  • Super Moderator
  • 5,399 posts
  • Joined 14-July 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
Still voting for PerfectDisk. I've upgraded to the "for vmware" version recently (on Vista x64), which also defrags my VMs, without even having to install it in them. The Virtual Enterprise Ed is looking good too. It's still a lot better than Diskeeper and priced better too :yes:
Coffee: \ˈkȯ-fē, ˈkä-\. noun. Heaven in a cup. Life's only treasure. The meaning of life. Kaffee ist wunderbar. C8H10N4O2 FTW.

#6
MagicAndre1981

MagicAndre1981

    after Windows 7 GA still Vista lover :)

  • Patrons
  • 6,124 posts
  • Joined 28-August 05
  • OS:Vista Ultimate x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

I'm using the build in tool from Vista.
Posted Image

#7
minotaur

minotaur

    Newbie

  • Member
  • 29 posts
  • Joined 04-July 07
I voted for Diskeeper. Would have specifically selected the 2009 Pro version if that option was there. It's the best defragger I've come across..set and forget...never worry about defragging.

#8
garnet

garnet

    Newbie

  • Member
  • 18 posts
  • Joined 17-June 05
Diskeeper :thumbup

#9
Access Denied

Access Denied

    Access Denied

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 239 posts
  • Joined 19-March 04
Forgot to post back, lol. PD 10 offline defragged just perfectly on Win7 beta 1. Its safe guys and gals, lol. PD 10 is DA BEST!
Q9650 w/ P5Q PRO
4 GB DDR2 OCZ 1200

#10
ZileXa

ZileXa

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 767 posts
  • Joined 27-May 04
Is there any test or review putting the freeware defraggers against Perfectdisk and Diskeeper?

#11
Nick_White

Nick_White

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 137 posts
  • Joined 14-March 08
How about a test that shows if there is a performance gain after defragmenting?

#12
DigeratiPrime

DigeratiPrime

    MSFN Junkie

  • Patrons
  • 3,550 posts
  • Joined 18-August 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

How about a test that shows if there is a performance gain after defragmenting?


In basic theory it should definitely help with reads scattered over a disc, since the header has to physically move between tracks; the whole process of which creates an access time. Then hopefully all the data is contiguous on that track so it doesn't have to go through the expensive process again. This doesn't pertain to SSD drives where the access time is virtually wirespeed and uniform.

These days it matters less with discs being generally faster, thus reduced latency, and having better seek logic such as NCQ. Also memory is relatively cheap, and Operating Systems like Vista have SuperFetch, so we need to access the disk less often.
Recommended Software: KeePass | Microsoft ICE | VisualWget | Vitamin D Video |

#13
Zenskas

Zenskas

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 484 posts
  • Joined 07-May 08
  • OS:Windows 8.1 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
I have got to say, Windows XP's built in defragger works fine for me. It is simple, and although it can't do much really and only increases performance by a very small amount on my system, it does the job. On computers like mine which gets a registry clean, virus clean, spyware clean, driver sweep every time new drivers are installed etc, it doesn't do much but on slower PC's with a lot of junk on them it can help a bit. I have heard good thinks about diskeeper and will probably end up trying that out to get max performance.

Edited by Zenskas, 16 March 2009 - 04:56 AM.

[Passive Gamer] Silverstone TJ08-EW | Intel Core i7 3770S | Silverstone Heligon HE02 | ASUS Maximus IV Gene-Z/Gen3 | 8GB Kingston HyperX Fury 1866MHz | Samsung 840 EVO 250GB | ASUS GTX 750 Ti Strix OC 2GB | Antec Neo HE 550W |


#14
alrichdesa

alrichdesa

    Giving Windows 7 A Shot

  • Member
  • 48 posts
  • Joined 08-February 09
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
+1 Defraggler

Pros

:Free
:Low Level Defrag
:Defrag Free Space

Cons

No Page File Defrag
No Boot Defrag
No Registry Defrag

The fact that it is freeware, it makes up for all the cons. Besides it is more than sufficient for the average user!

Best paid defragmenter = Diskeeper

Edited by alrichdesa, 16 March 2009 - 07:14 AM.

No, I Don't Have A Solution, But I Certainly Admire The Problem.
-- Ashleigh Brilliant

#15
Martin H

Martin H

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 802 posts
  • Joined 24-November 06
  • OS:none specified
I'm using Jkdefrag, since it's very lightweight, fast, features several optimization strategies and is freeware/open-source :thumbup

http://www.kessels.com/Jkdefrag/

/* Moved to Linux - Thanks for a nice stay all! */
Posted Image


#16
mooms

mooms

    Hello world !

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 303 posts
  • Joined 13-October 07
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
I vote for perfect disk (10) , much better than diskeeper than i precedently used !
I have also tested defragler, good for defrgmenting single files, but not as good as perfectdisk

#17
-X-

-X-

    Member

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 2,429 posts
  • Joined 08-January 04
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

For me the default windows defragmenter does a good enough job.
I think the defrag business is all smoke an mirrors. Show me some benchmarks where I would notice a difference and I'll change my tune.

Download all Windows XP Post SP3 High-Priority Updates with a simple double click @ xdot.tk post-12166-0-42859000-1399044129.png ]
               If someone helps you fix a problem, please report back so they and others can benefit from the solution. Thanks!


#18
meowing

meowing

    XP64 is a joy forever

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 135 posts
  • Joined 24-July 08
  • OS:XP Pro x64
  • Country: Country Flag
Jeroen Kessels is king for me. JKdefrag runs at true 64 bit (in Win XP x64) and is ideal for large disks with large files. It is much faster, smarter and more thoughtful than the others. I've been using it since 2002 and the others pale in comparison.
I don't need a fancy interface, and I personally trust Jeroen. His forum speaks a thousand words of pure wisdom regarding Windows and harddisk usage. Last but not least, it's not so tough on SSD either.

#19
Maleko

Maleko

    Gold Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,111 posts
  • Joined 17-June 05
PerfectDisk for me still!
Posted Image

#20
gUiTaR_mIkE

gUiTaR_mIkE

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 107 posts
  • Joined 29-April 09
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Raxco PerfectDisk! :)
Mike :)

#21
ripken204

ripken204

    The Hardware Guy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,311 posts
  • Joined 23-December 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
i havnt defragged in years and now i have even less of a reason to do so.
i reinstall windows a cpl of times a year anyways.
all my data is stored on a linux server and its just backup.. who cares about defragging it, i dont need speed, it already transfers over 100mbps..
and my desktop just has my games/programs on it, nothing more.
and my desktop is raid0 and server raid6...


Desktop: || lappped Q6700 w/ lapped TRUE || ASUS P5Q Deluxe|| Sapphire 4870 1GB || Mushkin Ascent XP2-8500 (2x2GB) || 2 x WD6400AAKS || Corsair HX620W || Lian-Li PC-60FB || 2 x BenQ G2400WD || Vista Ultimate 64bit || Samsung SH-S223Q || Logitech MX518 || Logitech Ultra-X || SteelSeries SX || Klipsch ProMedia Ultra 5.1 || ATI TV Wonder 650 PCIe ||
Server: || E5200 w/ XIGMATEK HDT-S1283 || ASUS P5Q-EM || EVGA 8800GTS G92 w/ Accelero S1 R2 || G.SKILL 6400 2x2GB || 1 x WD6400AAKS || 4 x 1TB Samsung F1 || SeaSonic M12II SS-500GM || Antec Three Hundred || Samsung SH-203BL || Ubuntu 8.10 ||


#22
Mexxi

Mexxi

    Newbie

  • Member
  • 35 posts
  • Joined 10-January 10
I voted for Disktrix' Ultimate Defrag. It is the best defragmentation software there is and here's why: All other defraggers usually only offer pre-defined sorting modes. While UD has those too, you can define your own additionally. This makes it the most powerful software there is.

For normal users I usually recommend Raxco's Perfect Disc and O&O, however, I was disappointed with their latest packages. They're bloated and offer little in terms of efficiency. Also, they suck defragging huge files on really cluttered up hard drives. I used them on a 300GB HDD before and they just gave up on the biggest files. Even worse, they sorted the files in a totally inefficient manner without giving me the option to influence that. Whoever remembers SpeedDisk from Norton Utilities for Win95 knows that this great program already offered personal sort options, so why can't these overpriced, bloated other software packages offer that?

Anyway, Disktrix has no problem with big files on almost filled up hard drives at all. I tested it on a 500GB HDD filled with 1GB+ sized files with a fragmentation degree of 85% and with about 5% of free space. It managed to defrag the hdd completely. Only a single file was left in 2 fragments. After seeing Raxco and O&O giving up on a much easier task, I was pretty impressed.

Furthermore, UD not just allows for personal sort orders, it also allows for special file placement to make use of a hard drives slow and fast parts. This is an essential option that no other defragger that I tried offered. Using this option, I was able to boost the boot up speed of a 6 year old Notebook with WinXP on it from 2 minutes to just 25 seconds (it has a very slow HDD). Add the fact that UD is one of the smallest and sleakest defraggers and you have a great program. It also supports boot time defrag, which is a rare feature and it allows for defragging the MFT, which is even rarer. Afaik, hardly any other tool does that.

#23
Martin H

Martin H

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 802 posts
  • Joined 24-November 06
  • OS:none specified
Yes, UltimateDefrag is good, but if looking for an alternative, then the freeware MyDefrag(succesor of JkDefrag) is capable of doing nearly all the same things, e.g. optimize for the faster HDD area, defrag MFT and it even includes it's own scripting-language so as to allow the end-user to script just about anything he wants for the fileplacement operation...

Personally, then i still just use JkDefrag, as i don't have use for the new functionality and like using cmd parameters instead of inlcuding all the scriptfiles etc.

I preffer JkDefrag ower the built-in XP defragger, because JkDefrag is faster, automatic i.e. defrags all partitions and quits by default, does file-placement and can defrag big files etc.

Edited by Martin H, 19 February 2010 - 05:48 PM.

/* Moved to Linux - Thanks for a nice stay all! */
Posted Image


#24
morland

morland

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 204 posts
  • Joined 19-March 07
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag
I voted for Defraggler. It looks good but i wonder if there is something even better than that

#25
Martin H

Martin H

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 802 posts
  • Joined 24-November 06
  • OS:none specified
From looking at it's feature-list, then it dosen't appear to support file-placement optimization(but does consolidate free-space however) and so based on that, then I would personally preffer MyDefrag over defraggler, but that's just my oppenion.

/* Moved to Linux - Thanks for a nice stay all! */
Posted Image





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users