starwars battle front 1 is SLOW
#1
Posted 21 February 2009 - 06:58 AM
my comp has
386mb of sd ram pc-133
933mhz cpu l2 256KB
64mb geforce 4 mx 440 se pci
yamaha xg-ds sound card
i see that the cpu is losing by 77 mhz but i think that dont do no differents
becasue i uesd to have 766mhz and it ran bad and then 933mhz now and not much differents in this game
i see my computer is bit old but shouldent this game run fine on lowest graphics??????????
#2
Posted 21 February 2009 - 07:14 AM
It has been quite some time since I played that game but the specs you list do seem a bit low for it.
#3
Posted 21 February 2009 - 07:58 PM
yea cpu just losing BY 77 MHZ and i said that i uesd to have a 766mhz and it didit do much different when i put in the 933mhz
andi got 386mb of sd ram
so am gussing its my graphics card?
AM I RIGHT!
#4
Posted 21 February 2009 - 11:33 PM
Your graphics card is pretty slow though for this game. The MX 440 SE is one of the slowest 64mb graphics cards out there. And it doesn't support directx 9.0c which is what this game needs to run optimally.
So to play it on your system I would defrag the hard drive, uninstall un-needed programs and junk, disable background programs while playing the game, update to the latest version of the game (1.2 or 1.3 I think) turn everything on lowest detail and play at under 800x600 res, and have a look here to find out which settings to change for best performance: http://www.tweakguides.com/SWB_1.html
Just remember that even if your CPU was 1Ghz it still would not run perfect as it does recommend 2Ghz P4 which is a lot faster than your CPU. It is best to say that if your PC does not meet recommended requirements (yours doesnt even meet minimum in all areas) then it will either run slow or look no where near as good as it looks on the box.
Edit: Oh yeah and your graphics card is the PCI version which is not as quick as AGP. So your graphics card is way too slow for this game at medium-high settings.
This post has been edited by Zenskas: 21 February 2009 - 11:37 PM
#5
Posted 22 February 2009 - 05:20 AM
#6
Posted 22 February 2009 - 06:15 AM
and my card is a 64 MB 3D Card with Hardware Transform & Lighting (T&L) Capability
LOL
#7
Posted 22 February 2009 - 12:55 PM
"Complete DirectX® support, including DirectX 8.1"
No DirectX 9.0 hardware support...
#8
Posted 22 February 2009 - 10:08 PM
#9
Posted 22 February 2009 - 11:59 PM
From the Technical Sheet - nVIDIA geforce4 MX 64MB:
"Complete DirectX® support, including DirectX 8.1"
No DirectX 9.0 hardware support...
yea its just saying it supports directx 8.1
dont mean it dont work with dx 9 Lol
and all dirextx 9c games work fine on my computer lol
i just dont understan yea mabye it should run slow but not that slow
mabyes its one of those el cheapo EA a'like games just to make some money really fast
because i thought far cry wounldent work on my g card but it work great
i could amost put it on highest graphics but it was just bit to much so i put on medium and it works great so meh some games run good and some work s***ty
#10
Posted 23 February 2009 - 12:30 AM
starcraftmaster, on Feb 23 2009, 04:59 PM, said:
From the Technical Sheet - nVIDIA geforce4 MX 64MB:
"Complete DirectX® support, including DirectX 8.1"
No DirectX 9.0 hardware support...
yea its just saying it supports directx 8.1
dont mean it dont work with dx 9 Lol
So if my computer does not support a socket 775 cpu does that mean it will still fit one? Nope.
Your card will still work, but not as fast as a dx 9 card and will not look as good as it cannot process dx9 graphics very well, if at all.
starcraftmaster, on Feb 23 2009, 04:59 PM, said:
ALL DX9c games? This one doesn't obviously.
starcraftmaster, on Feb 23 2009, 04:59 PM, said:
mabyes its one of those el cheapo EA a'like games just to make some money really fast
because i thought far cry wounldent work on my g card but it work great
i could amost put it on highest graphics but it was just bit to much so i put on medium and it works great so meh some games run good and some work s***ty
Yeah some games have higher system requirements than others but run better. It is whatever they want you to believe is the min or rec. Try looking at the guide I linked in my other post. You may be able to get it to run faster if you follow that guide.
Far Cry 1 actually has lower system requirements than your star wars game. Same ram and cpu but the graphics card min is a directx 9.0B card not 9.0C. And far cry works well on lower end systems as it has a large range of hardware it can run ok on. If you crank the graphics it needs a half good system but on low-mid any mid range PC built in the last 8 years can run it ok.
#11
Posted 23 February 2009 - 02:08 AM
Zenskas
ALL DX9c games? This one doesn't obviously.
well most lol
Star Wars: Empire at War
System requirements Windows:1 GHz CPU or equivalent; 256MB RAM, 32MB graphics card with Hardware T&L, 2.5GB hard drive space, DirectX 9.0c, Windows 2000/XP.
Mac OS X: Mac OS X version 10.4.8, 1.83Hz Intel processor (2GHz recommended), 512MB of RAM (1GB recommended), 64MB video RAM (256MB recommended) 3.5GB hard disk space, DVD drive.
bam DirectX 9.0c, the games run GREAT LOL
#12
Posted 23 February 2009 - 04:04 AM
starcraftmaster, on Feb 23 2009, 07:08 PM, said:
Zenskas
ALL DX9c games? This one doesn't obviously.
well most lol
Star Wars: Empire at War
System requirements Windows:1 GHz CPU or equivalent; 256MB RAM, 32MB graphics card with Hardware T&L, 2.5GB hard drive space, DirectX 9.0c, Windows 2000/XP.
Mac OS X: Mac OS X version 10.4.8, 1.83Hz Intel processor (2GHz recommended), 512MB of RAM (1GB recommended), 64MB video RAM (256MB recommended) 3.5GB hard disk space, DVD drive.
bam DirectX 9.0c, the games run GREAT LOL
To quote, just press quote on the bottom of their post.
Yes but its a 32mb graphics card empire at war needs, not 64mb. So you could probably run it on a geforce 2 mx400 but starwars battlefront I would recommend playing on at least a geforce 4 mx 460 preferably a geforce 4 TI 4200 or better.
This post has been edited by Zenskas: 23 February 2009 - 04:05 AM
#13
Posted 23 February 2009 - 06:28 AM
Zenskas, on Feb 23 2009, 08:04 AM, said:
starcraftmaster, on Feb 23 2009, 07:08 PM, said:
Zenskas
ALL DX9c games? This one doesn't obviously.
well most lol
Star Wars: Empire at War
System requirements Windows:1 GHz CPU or equivalent; 256MB RAM, 32MB graphics card with Hardware T&L, 2.5GB hard drive space, DirectX 9.0c, Windows 2000/XP.
Mac OS X: Mac OS X version 10.4.8, 1.83Hz Intel processor (2GHz recommended), 512MB of RAM (1GB recommended), 64MB video RAM (256MB recommended) 3.5GB hard disk space, DVD drive.
bam DirectX 9.0c, the games run GREAT LOL
To quote, just press quote on the bottom of their post.
Yes but its a 32mb graphics card empire at war needs, not 64mb. So you could probably run it on a geforce 2 mx400 but starwars battlefront I would recommend playing on at least a geforce 4 mx 460 preferably a geforce 4 TI 4200 or better.
yea but it running a directx 9.0c game Lol
#14
Posted 23 February 2009 - 11:55 PM
#16
Posted 25 February 2009 - 01:57 PM
#17
Posted 26 February 2009 - 12:56 AM
#18
Posted 26 February 2009 - 02:47 AM
starcraftmaster, on Feb 25 2009, 07:16 PM, said:
What directx 8.1 graphics looks good does it? Well I guess you have never played crysis warhead
You do not need a credit card for ebay. Using paypal, you can have it taken from your account. Or send a money order. Or just dont play that game if it runs so slow.
#19
Posted 26 February 2009 - 04:23 PM
Quote
well that was a setback on me two when i was growing up dont feel so bad bro...
BUT one thing you can do is like at a pharmacy or walmart you can get a pre-paid credit card, kinda like a gift certificate but its a visa, and you can purchase online with it
#20
Posted 26 February 2009 - 07:47 PM
any thanks for making me learn a new thing aabout g cards and the directx 8.1 stuff
if i update the g card bios itself would that do any thing?
i looked at the aopen website but coundent find any thing but the bios update tool
This post has been edited by starcraftmaster: 26 February 2009 - 08:14 PM



Help


Back to top









