MSFN Forum: PNY RAM - thoughts? - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

PNY RAM - thoughts? Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   jrf2027 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 238
  • Joined: 06-September 04

Posted 12 May 2009 - 08:02 AM

I did some searching, and I can't seem to find any recent opinions - everything I found is dated 2006 or earlier...

I want to increase my RAM in my desktop (Gateway GM5478 - Q6600, currently 3 GB PC2 667, everything stock, no OC) to 6 GB. The machine came with 2 GB (2 x 1GB), I installed an additional 1 GB (2 x 512 MB) a few months after buying it. I'm not a gamer, and I don't plan on overclocking this RAM, but I do quite a bit of video editing on the machine. My plan is to remove the 2 x 512 MB and replace them with 2 x 2 GB for a total of 6 GB, then do a clean install with Vista x64.

In the past, I've bought either Kingston or Corsair, with no problems, but while shopping this morning I discovered a great deal on a 4 GB kit from PNY. (Newegg link) My other choice is a 4 GB kit from Kingston (Newegg link). I've done the research, the specs are perfect for my motherboard, the reviews seem OK...anybody have any personal experience with PNY RAM in the last few months? Should I buy the Kingston RAM and spend the extra money, or buy the PNY RAM and a case of cheap beer? :P

Let me know your thoughts. Thanks!

This post has been edited by jrf2027: 12 May 2009 - 08:03 AM



#2 User is offline   x-Shadow-x 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 356
  • Joined: 12-February 08

Posted 12 May 2009 - 02:40 PM

I wouldn't go with 667 timings, its pretty slow (although if you add 800 or 1066, it will just go down to 667). My suggestion is to look at this page Here. Instead of going with 667, go with 4GB (just 4GB) of 1066. You will have better speed over 6GB of 667. It is also very cheap.

This post has been edited by x-Shadow-x: 12 May 2009 - 02:40 PM


#3 User is offline   jrf2027 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 238
  • Joined: 06-September 04

Posted 12 May 2009 - 03:47 PM

I thought about 1066, but my motherboard appears limited to either 667 or 800, based on my research, and it looks to be pretty finicky about what 800 modules it will accept. The motherboard is made by Intel, Gateway calls it a "Schroeder Town", but it's essentially an Intel DG33TL without a DVI output on the board.

#4 User is offline   x-Shadow-x 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 356
  • Joined: 12-February 08

Posted 12 May 2009 - 03:58 PM

I was afraid of that. 667 clock is really crappy, I don't know how anyone can live with it. From the two links you posted, I would just go with the PNY, you would save $10, and if you went with the Kingston, you wouldn't see a difference (except $10 less dollars in your wallet). But if I were you, I would get a new MoBo, something that can handle some good RAM. You would see a huge difference in speed.

#5 User is offline   puntoMX 

  • n00b of Masters and Vice Versa
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 4,686
  • Joined: 28-June 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 13 May 2009 - 01:45 PM

I don't know if you use onboard Video or not, if not I would use 6GB at 667MHz and if you use onboard Video I would take 2* 2GB PC6400 / 800MT/s RAM indeed. no use for 1066MHz as the timings will go up too. next step up will be a i7/AM3 with DDR3 any way (i5 sucks with its dual channel DDR3). I would use the system with that motherboards as it is for now ;).

#6 User is offline   jrf2027 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 238
  • Joined: 06-September 04

Posted 15 May 2009 - 01:50 PM

Thanks for the advice guys. I'm probably going to be using this system as my primary machine for at least the next three years, so I decided to go with 4 GB of DDR2 800 RAM with a CAS latency of 5; I'll add in another 4 GB down the road. For what I do, it should serve my purposes.

This post has been edited by jrf2027: 15 May 2009 - 01:51 PM


#7 User is offline   Kelsenellenelvian 

  • WPI Guru
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 7,756
  • Joined: 18-September 03
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 15 May 2009 - 02:19 PM

I have had pny ram in the past and never had a problem with it.

#8 User is offline   bonestonne 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 846
  • Joined: 27-July 05

Posted 24 May 2009 - 08:03 AM

I've only seen this happen once before, but when you install Vista x64, if you have trouble, you might try taking out all the RAM, and only putting in 1GB or less, and trying to install again.

I know someone who had that problem with a Q9550 i think, when installing Vista x64 on 8gb of RAM or something along those lines. the install would constantly fail, she took out all but 1gb, and the install went fine.

she had to install some patch to Vista from M$ before adding the rest of the RAM though...google it, i'll see if i can find the topic on another forum.

::edit::
here's the link:
http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewt...sc&start=61

first post has it all

This post has been edited by bonestonne: 24 May 2009 - 08:08 AM


#9 User is offline   starcraftmaster 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 414
  • Joined: 11-September 08

Posted 25 May 2009 - 04:28 AM

i got a old 256mb pc-133 pny ram from a old computer(probloy uesd a lot)
using it on my old win me works fine
looks like PNY are good
but i got a other 256mb Pny but it was high density and the mobo woundent work with that
so make sure its low density ram

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy