MSFN Forum: Symantec endpoint protection - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



Unattended CD/DVD Guide Homepage · MSFN Forum Rules

Welcome to the Applications Installs forum. Make sure you read the forum rules before you start posting.

Links/Requests to warez and/or any illegal material (porn, cracks, serials, etc..) will not be tolerated. Discussion of circumventing WGA/activation/timebombs/keygens or any other illegal activity will also not be tolerated.

We try our best to keep this forum clean of illegal content. If you see any illegal activity use the "report" button you find in every post to report the specific post to the moderators. If you ignore any of the rules you will be banned without notice.

Read Forum Rules
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Symantec endpoint protection Symantec endpoint protection fails in unattended xp pro installation Rate Topic: -----

#21 User is offline   iamtheky 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 843
  • Joined: 11-November 08

Posted 11 June 2009 - 09:42 AM

Quote

I thought it was useless keeping gaps in the 3 digit numbers, 010 and 015, by the way those numbers are customizable i mean just simply having them numerically ordered?


Yes they run in order so 001 /v 1
								  001 /v 2
								  001 /v 3
would run prior to:		 002 /v 1
								   002 /v 2
								   002 /v 3
also:						   003 /v 1
								  003 /v 11	<-- 11 and 12 would run before 2 because it does not order values numerically, So indeed there would be a 
								  003 /v 12	<--   workaround if you needed to reorder, and did not leave spaces, that would not require an overhaul.
								  003 / 2
								  003 / 3


I believe it recommends to keep gaps that way if you find there is a hiccup and you need to drop a 'net stop msiserver' or 'shutdown -r -t 0' or a fake ping wait, or install a forgotten dependency, you dont have to reorder the whole thing. My customers are undoubtedly afk during the process, so feeling unattended is subjective. I suppose the only advantage I have is that if I want to install a 'clean' XP box (nothing in add remove except the 1.1 framework i install at T -13), I can do so with the very same disc by killing the runonceex and then deleting the contents of the key in the registry.

This post has been edited by iamtheky: 11 June 2009 - 09:52 AM



Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy