Jump to content

Welcome to MSFN Forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account



Photo

Largest supported hard drive on Windows 2000 SP4

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1
clueless_furball

clueless_furball

    Newbie

  • Member
  • 34 posts
  • Joined 18-July 08
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag
I want to replace my hard drive(s) The smallest new hard drives I can find are 150 GB. Will Windows 2k SP4 support drives this big?


How to remove advertisement from MSFN

#2
Dave-H

Dave-H

    MSFN Expert

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 1,067 posts
  • Joined 04-January 06
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

I want to replace my hard drive(s) The smallest new hard drives I can find are 150 GB. Will Windows 2K SP4 support drives this big?

Yes it will.
I use a 150GB FAT32 removable IDE storage drive on my system with no problems.
If you're using NTFS there should be no problem at all.
If you're using FAT32, there is a limit to how big a drive Windows 2000 can format, I believe 32GB.
There are means to work around this though if you are using FAT32 for any reason (I have to because I have a dual boot machine with Windows 98SE).
:)

Edited by Dave-H, 12 July 2009 - 04:18 PM.

Triple boot Windows 98SE SP2.1a, Windows XP Professional SP3 32 bit, and Windows 8.1 Pro 64 bit.
Dual 3.16GHz X5460 Quad Core Xeons with 8GB RAM. Dual graphics cards ATI Radeon X850 and Nvidia Geforce 210. 1920x1080 32 Bit Colour with Large Fonts.


#3
Colonel O'Neill

Colonel O'Neill

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 255 posts
  • Joined 22-July 08
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Are there actually limitations to Windows 2000 and the size of a hard drive (not already remedied and specific to Windows 2000)?

I installed it on a partition of a 160GB hard drive with no ill effects. As long as LBA is enabled during setup (slipstream SP5) you're good to go.
T400: 7x86
X100e: 7x86, 2008R2 (in progress), 2000 (in progress).

#4
WildBill

WildBill

    Senior Member

  • Developer
  • 696 posts
  • Joined 09-August 05
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
I've got a 1Tb drive working on my Win2k box, formatted NTFS. I had to have EnableBigLBA turned on, but otherwise I've had no issues.

#5
Martin H

Martin H

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 791 posts
  • Joined 24-November 06
  • OS:none specified
Yes, adding the EnableBigLba reg-entry makes Win2k-sp4 support 48-Bit LBA adressing i.e. supporting HDDs over 137gb... If wanting to utilise this during setup, then the reg-entry needs to be added to the hive files. If using FDV's Win2k IE/Junk Removal Fileset, then this is done for you allready, and HFSLIP also does it for you if placing reg.exe(Win2kCD:\SUPPORT\TOOLS\SUPPORT.CAB) into the HFTOOLS folder...

/* Moved to Linux - Thanks for a nice stay all! */
Posted Image


#6
888

888

    Junior

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 68 posts
  • Joined 15-July 07
Same here, last week I added 1TB drive to my W2K box, no problems (as expected).

But if you are going to install fresh W2K on such drive, you have to modify your install CD.
I think original W2K CD have 137GB drive size limit (I'm not sure - I haven't use my original CD for years, but considering it came out in 1999 I think I'm correct).

Of course we're talking NTFS (except for very few scenarios there is no point to use FAT32 with any NT OS anyways lol)

#7
clueless_furball

clueless_furball

    Newbie

  • Member
  • 34 posts
  • Joined 18-July 08
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag
How about spliting a hard drive of that size into two. Would that help?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users