ripken204

Cleartype - do you like it?

Do you like cleartype?   44 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like cleartype?

    • Yes
      41
    • No
      6

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

31 posts in this topic

Cleartype is enable by default in vista and win7.

It actually makes things harder to read for me and hurts my eyes.

How about you guys?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This e7 article (Win7 blog) says 94% of users seem to prefer cleartype (good read too).

Anyhow. I like it, text looks great. I'm assuming you already went through the cleartype tuner and all that.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yea, the tuner still does not help, the text is actually more clear with cleartype off, very odd.

must just be me then.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

im using the default font and default font size, always have.

and i have 24" lcds. even on my 1680x1050 15.4" laptop screen it looks horrible.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
must just be me then.

Looks like it's just you.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have to agree - cleartype on all my LCDs makes a huge difference (in a positive way), especially on smaller laptop screens with lower resolutions. Really cleans it up.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It does make a difference for me too. And that's on a 21" Viewsonic wide.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With me it seems to differ. On XP I can either take it or leave it depending on the monitor, it tends to look better on LCDs and worse on CRTs and since I use a CRT with XP at home I think I have it off right now. CRTs are pretty good at antialiasing text anyway. I don't really notice it in Vista because it's always there, but it seems better than XPs cleartype. More 'one size fits all'.

I had a customer phone me up once complaining about IE 7 and how she couldn't read any of the text because it was incredibly fuzzy and 'illegible'. I asked her if she was using a CRT etc and after 5 minutes I just couldn't see why the Cleartype was making everything so bad. I eventually just gave her instructions to turn off Cleartype. I guess some people just really don't like it!

BTW: Antialiasing of screen fonts on Apple Macs has been an option since Mac OS 8.6 I think, and OS X antialiases screen fonts like there is no tomorrow... yet I see no complaining there. :blink:

Edited by JustinStacey
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
it tends to look better on LCDs and worse on CRTs

It's a technology made specifically for LCDs, so that's hardly surprising. CRTs don't have subpixels.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yea, the tuner still does not help, the text is actually more clear with cleartype off, very odd.

must just be me then.

No, I'm with you all the way. I have never understood the use of cleartype. It makes my fonts blurry (whatever other people say about it, blurring *is* what happens, on every screentype), which I really detest strongly. I've created truetype fonts for a living for a couple of years in the nineties, so maybe that has something to do with it. I always like my fonts to be displayed as sharp and original as they possibly can be.

Edited by meowing
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

good to know that someone understands what i mean.

as you said, it is sharper with cleartype off. with it on it makes words stand out more but they are not sharp at all.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like Cleartype, most of the time. Not on CRT's, granted as they are fuzzy to begin with. However, I like them on LCD's, to an extent. Properly configured, it's great. Nonetheless, I prefer Cleartype more on some LCD monitors than other LCD monitors. The effect probably depends on the DPI of your LCD screen too.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I always like my fonts to be displayed as sharp and original as they possibly can be.

Then you should prefer ClearType. The intent of ClearType is just that.

Reference : http://www.microsoft.com/typography/WhatIsClearType.mspx

Someone who's familiar with the fact that vectors can't be accurately reproduced across square pixels should be able to appreciate how ClearType aliases the vector/pixel path to improve the font fidelity.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.