MSFN Forum: Which oldest OS by Microsoft do you use? - MSFN Forum

Jump to content


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Which oldest OS by Microsoft do you use?

Poll: Which oldest OS do you use? (63 member(s) have cast votes)

Choose one answer.

  1. Windows 7 (8 votes [12.70%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.70%

  2. Windows Vista (5 votes [7.94%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.94%

  3. Windows 2008 (server) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. Windows XP (20 votes [31.75%])

    Percentage of vote: 31.75%

  5. Windows 2003 (server) (2 votes [3.17%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.17%

  6. Windows 2000 (desktop) (4 votes [6.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.35%

  7. Windows 2000 (server) (2 votes [3.17%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.17%

  8. Windows Millenium (2 votes [3.17%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.17%

  9. Windows 98/98SE (9 votes [14.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  10. Windows NT 3.x (1 votes [1.59%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.59%

  11. Windows 95 (1 votes [1.59%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.59%

  12. Windows NT 4 (1 votes [1.59%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.59%

  13. Windows 3.11/3.1 (1 votes [1.59%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.59%

  14. MS-Dos 6.22 (5 votes [7.94%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.94%

  15. Older OS (2 votes [3.17%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.17%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Offler 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 497
  • Joined: 29-October 06

Posted 23 October 2009 - 02:49 AM

Choose OS which is the oldest on functional machine you own, even if you have older filesharing server, or you keep your old 486 alive because of some games.


#2 User is offline   G8YMW 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 64
  • Joined: 20-May 08
  • OS:Windows 7 x86

Posted 23 October 2009 - 03:32 AM

I have Win98 SE2ME which since I got a new Mobo 18 months ago is used for maintaining my XP setup. I wont use NTFS because I have no use for it and besides, XP's defragger is PAINFULLY slow

#3 User is offline   Mijzelf 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 460
  • Joined: 11-April 07

Posted 23 October 2009 - 04:00 AM

I've an old 486SX running W95, which acts as printserver.

#4 User is offline   Tripredacus 

  • K-Mart-ian Legend
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 8,723
  • Joined: 28-April 06
  • OS:Server 2012
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 23 October 2009 - 11:44 AM

My OS is not listed! I have 2 notebooks running Windows NT Workstation 3.51! They are 486 Compaq Elites.

#5 User is offline   ripken204 

  • The Hardware Guy
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,311
  • Joined: 23-December 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 23 October 2009 - 12:10 PM

i use XP only because there are no drivers for the board i need to connect to for coding assembly in vista/7.

This post has been edited by ripken204: 23 October 2009 - 12:10 PM


#6 User is offline   awergh 

  • MSFN Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,059
  • Joined: 02-October 05
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 23 October 2009 - 04:09 PM

the 486 DX2 66 has MS-Dos 6.22 for one piece of software that cant run on anything else

#7 User is offline   Offler 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 497
  • Joined: 29-October 06

Posted 24 October 2009 - 05:53 AM

to Tripredacus: i know there is NT 3.x windows, but the poll answers are limited to 15 :(... Shall I merge it with windows 3.1?

#8 User is offline   cannie 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 454
  • Joined: 04-June 08
  • OS:Windows 7 x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 24 October 2009 - 08:25 AM

Even when it is wholly operative, at present I use Windows 98 only to clean, clone and rebuild Windows XP, using the dual boot screen of MS, and it's the best support I could ever imagine for it.

#9 User is offline   jaclaz 

  • The Finder
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 11,574
  • Joined: 23-July 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 10 November 2009 - 03:42 AM

View PostOffler, on Oct 24 2009, 12:53 PM, said:

to Tripredacus: i know there is NT 3.x windows, but the poll answers are limited to 15 :(... Shall I merge it with windows 3.1?


As long as you won't merge "my" Windows NT 4.0 with Windows 95 :ph34r:, it's allright. ;)
:P

jaclaz

#10 User is offline   beats 

  • Free cookies
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 344
  • Joined: 08-November 07

Posted 10 November 2009 - 04:52 AM

View PostOffler, on Oct 24 2009, 12:53 PM, said:

to Tripredacus: i know there is NT 3.x windows, but the poll answers are limited to 15 :(... Shall I merge it with windows 3.1?

Just merge the two Win98 options? You don't list all Win95 versions either.

#11 User is offline   DigeratiPrime 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 3,490
  • Joined: 18-August 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 10 November 2009 - 01:41 PM

Probably no reason to include the current OS aka Windows 7 as Server 2008 R2 is not in the poll. But then I couldn't vote as that's all I run :)

#12 User is offline   Offler 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 497
  • Joined: 29-October 06

Posted 11 November 2009 - 03:56 AM

I have a reason of putting Win7 here. Its because some people will buy new computer while selling the old one, only they migrate all data except OS. I want to see if there is a lot of these people. Also main reason of this poll is to see if people are running machines older thatn 2 or more years.

Mostly the OS support for Win 95 and its derivations were supported 11 years, althought first practically usable systems were bit newer. Also the next generation of NT 5.0 which is currently still supported will have much longer lifespan that any other windows before...

Some people which live in world of new things do not ever use anything older than 2 years no matter if it works or not. Really no offense, but i was able to work with my old Pentium III for eight years and only now i am going to make a really major upgrade.

This post has been edited by Offler: 11 November 2009 - 03:58 AM


#13 User is offline   woody.cool 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 38
  • Joined: 12-July 09
  • OS:Windows 7 x64

Posted 04 April 2010 - 12:36 PM

I'm really into retro gaming and keep a couple of old machines (a 386 and a few 486s) with MS-DOS 6.22, audio and network drivers (IPX ODI driver for IPX network multiplayer games)

I've taken these old PCs to retro gaming events for some Doom 'death match' action :thumbup

View PostTripredacus, on 23 October 2009 - 11:44 AM, said:

My OS is not listed! I have 2 notebooks running Windows NT Workstation 3.51! They are 486 Compaq Elites.

I've not seen NT Workstation 3.51 about in a LONG time.
I liked that OS at the time. 'twas great for my uses.
I upgraded to NT Workstation 4.0 not long after it became available though, as it had better Win32 support.

This post has been edited by woody.cool: 04 April 2010 - 12:37 PM


#14 User is offline   G8YMW 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 64
  • Joined: 20-May 08
  • OS:Windows 7 x86

Posted 04 April 2010 - 03:13 PM

I forgot, my old Amstrad PC1512 upgraded to 640k and 30 meg hard drive running MSDOS 3.2. OK I've not used it for a couple of years. My wife, Lucy aka M0LUY has still got her old Beeb (Acorn BBC B, twin 5.25 floppys, sideways rom board and shadow ram)

#15 User is offline   VideoRipper 

  • CSI Eastwood City
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 330
  • Joined: 11-February 10
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 04 April 2010 - 04:01 PM

I use Win98SE on an old Geode C3 based thin-client for some low level stuff (so I
don't have to use special direct-port access drivers) :rolleyes:

It is also 100% free of moving parts (running off a 2GB Compact Flash) :thumbup

#16 User is offline   woody.cool 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 38
  • Joined: 12-July 09
  • OS:Windows 7 x64

Posted 05 April 2010 - 04:27 PM

View PostG8YMW, on 04 April 2010 - 03:13 PM, said:

I forgot, my old Amstrad PC1512 upgraded to 640k and 30 meg hard drive running MSDOS 3.2. OK I've not used it for a couple of years. My wife, Lucy aka M0LUY has still got her old Beeb (Acorn BBC B, twin 5.25 floppys, sideways rom board and shadow ram)

I have quite a lot of old non-PC machines.
I too have a Beeb (Acorn BBC B, twin 5.25" drive, MMBEEB ROM & MMC card), several Amstrad CPCs (which run CP/M as the operating system outside of the Amstrad BASIC environment), several Commodore Amigas (running Amiga Workbench and my A1200 which has PC-TASK and MS-DOS 6.22 installed on it) and lots of other random old machines.

#17 User is offline   Blekthor 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 31
  • Joined: 20-June 08
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 19 August 2010 - 10:19 PM

I have a Compaq Luggable with ms-dos 3.3 on it - little bitty amber screen, 20mb hard card in a slot and 4 floppy disk drives. Cost me $20.00 and works fine.

#18 User is offline   Cyker 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 102
  • Joined: 21-June 10
  • OS:98SE

Posted 20 August 2010 - 06:36 AM

Hahaha! There are more Win98 users than Vista or 7!! :lol:

#19 User is offline   Andromeda43 

  • Retired PC Tech.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,001
  • Joined: 14-August 05
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 15 January 2011 - 02:17 PM

Is that really surprising? Not for this old tech.
After the SE upgrade and Unofficial Service Pack, 98 was one rock solid and very useful OS.
I reluctantly upgraded, years ago now, to XP because it was more compatible with the new software that was coming out.
Besides that, as a service tech, I needed to learn how to tweak and tune XP for top performance, which I've done.

I'm running XP-Pro-SP3 right now and I will be for quite some time to come.

Cheers Mates!

:thumbup

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2013 msfn.org
Privacy Policy