Jump to content

Welcome to MSFN Forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account


Photo

UDF-formatted hard disk drives under Windows 98

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
71 replies to this topic

#1
Multibooter

Multibooter

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 896 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag
UDF is known as a file system for DVDs. But very few people know that hard disk drives can also be formatted as UDF. A UDF- formatted HDD can be read by Windows 98 and Windows XP without any special drivers, Windows Explorer seems to work fine with it.

A special file system driver by SAI allows to read and write UDF-formatted HDDs under Win98 and WinXP.

The UDF file system allows theoretically very large file sizes, and it is not Microsoft, but open. A UDF-formatted HDD can be set from read-write to read-only by turning off the special file system driver.

I have attached 3 screenshots of the properties sheet of a UDF-formatted 80 GB HDD, under Win98 and WinXP. Under Win98 the UDF-formatted HDD has 2 drive letter (one is not accessible) when the special file system driver is active, but only 1 drive letter when the MS read-only driver is active. Under WinXP a UDF-formatted HDD has always a single drive letter, regardless of the driver.

SAI refers in their documentation to CDs and DVDs, not to HDDs. UDF-formatted HDDs seem to be uncharted territory under Win98. There are very few software tools for UDF-formatted HDDs. Acronis Disk Director Suite 10.0, for example, displays "File system error: Invalid format", Norton Disk Doctor displays "Unable to read from drive J:" and ScanDisk "cannot check this drive because there is no disk in it, it is not formatted or a disk utility has locked it".

Are there tools to handle UDF-formatted HDDs? Are there any horror stories about them? Does anybody have any experience with them? What are the benefits or disadvantages of a UDF-formatted HDD vs NTFS or FAT32? Could there be any special uses? Win98 Explorer has a major problem with file deletes when IE6 is installed - but maybe there is no such problem on a UDF-formatted HDD? Maybe some bugs of Win98 occur only on FAT/FAT32 partitions, but not on a UDF-formatted HDD? I seem to come across multiple-drive-letter problems quite regularly, do they occur also with a UDF-formatted HDD, which can have only one partition? Can USB sticks and SDHC card be formatted as UDF and be read and written to under Win98? Any ideas and suggestions about UDF-formatted HDDs are welcome.

Attached Files


Edited by Multibooter, 08 June 2013 - 01:48 PM.



How to remove advertisement from MSFN

#2
Multibooter

Multibooter

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 896 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag
(left free for an index of postings)

#3
Offler

Offler

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 497 posts
http://en.wikipedia....sal_Disk_Format

Advantages over NTFS:
- No journaling - better performance
- no trouble with permissions
- Acessible with multiple operating systems

Advantages over FAT32:
- Can handle bigger files

Windows 98 can work with version 1.02.

Since its behaviour is something that has not been tested yet with harddisks it might be interesting. I use UDF for DVDs and videocapturing. It is just a question how can other applications handle different filesystem. Generally there should be no trouble.

Is there any disk tool available, such as scandisk or chkdsk to scan the drive for errors?
And what exact method you have used for formatting?

http://homepage.mac....myhome/udf.html

Edited by Offler, 04 November 2009 - 06:12 AM.


#4
Multibooter

Multibooter

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 896 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag
Reading from a 2TiB HDD under Win98
I have formatted a 2TB HDD to UDF v1.02. The UDF-formatted 2TB HDD is accessible, without special software, as read-only under both Win98SE and WinXP SP2. The Sata rev3.0 2TB HDD (6.0 Gb/s, 64MB cache, 72000 RP/M) was inserted in a Kingwin USB 2.0 EZ-Dock2 docking station (2 slots for altogether 2 HDDs) and connected to a USB 2.0 PCCard in my 11-year-old Inspiron laptop. The EZ-Dock2 was using nusb v3.3.

I am still experimenting, but it looks like the whole 2TBs of the HDD are accessible under Win98SE, without any special software. There is no 137GB limit for UDF-formatted HDDs connected via USB under Win98. The 2TB UDF-formatted HDD was accessed Ok via USB on a near-virgin Win98SE system, on which no 137GB patch (ESDI_506.PDR) was installed [this patch is not needed for HDDs connected via USB]. Under Win98 the 2TB HDD had been set in Device Manager as Removable so that it gets assigned a drive letter, under WinXP the 2TB HDD is recognized immediately as "Local Disk".

wikipedia http://en.wikipedia....of_file_systems states as limit of the UDF filesystem "2 TiB (hard disk), 8 TiB (optical disc) (2^^32 times blocksize)". Maybe larger HDDs (up to 16TiB?), with 4kB sectors, can be formatted to UDF and read under Win98 without special software, in the USB enclosures with the JMicron chip http://www.msfn.org/...post__p__997914 But right now I am happy that the 2TB UDF-formatted HDD seems to work Ok under Win98SE and WinXP.

Here an excellent review of the UDF filesystem: http://www.diskinter...ossary/udf.html
The article "Wenguang's Introduction to Universal Disk Format (UDF)" is not available anymore at the link indicated by Offler in posting #3, but can be found at http://web.archive.o...myhome/udf.html

I am attaching a screen shot of the Properties sheet of the 2TB HDD under Win98SE.

In the screen shot "0 bytes Free space" shows that the 2TB HDD is read-only, similar to a huge DVD-+R. Read-only media cannot be overwritten by mistake or infected by e.g. exe infectors. 2 years ago the Tenga exe-infector infected one of my 1TB archive HDDs, with FAT32 and NTFS partitions, which demonstrated the vulnerability of regular HDD archives. With some special software on another operating system I can write to the 2TB UDF-formatted HDD (i.e. add/delete stuff in the UDF archive), but not under the normal Win98SE and WinXP operating system selections on my computer.

Attached Files


Edited by Multibooter, 21 July 2012 - 03:57 PM.


#5
dencorso

dencorso

    Adiuvat plus qui nihil obstat

  • Super Moderator
  • 5,756 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

And what exact method have you used for formatting?

Ditto! As far as I know WriteUDF! is no longer available and, BTW, the Software Architects, Inc. is no more, AFAIK.
Did you find an alternative? Posted Image

#6
rloew

rloew

    MSFN Expert

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,083 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag
I'm not sure what the point of using UDF with Windows 9X is.
Even if the File System can handle larger files, Windows 9x will not handle them. You need my Large File Emulator to do that.
The Read-Only limitation can be bypassed by doing raw Disk I/O so it is not secure.
FAT-32 can be definitely be extended to 16TiB with 4K Sectors. This can be done with or without USB.
Ye who enter my domain. Beware! Lest you become educated in the mysteries of the universe and suffer forever from the desire to know more.

#7
dencorso

dencorso

    Adiuvat plus qui nihil obstat

  • Super Moderator
  • 5,756 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

FAT-32 can be definitely be extended to 16TiB with 4K Sectors. This can be done with or without USB.

Getting Win9x/ME and 2k/XP to understand and use 4 kiB sectors, in a manufacturer agnostic way, seems to me one of the most pressing projects, ATM, since 3 TB HDDs are already out there. :yes:

#8
Multibooter

Multibooter

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 896 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

And what exact method have you used for formatting?

Ditto! As far as I know WriteUDF! is no longer available and, BTW, the Software Architects, Inc. is no more, AFAIK.
Did you find an alternative? Posted Image

I would describe all the UDF software I have seen from SAI, when it comes to the use with magnetic media, as alphas, not even as betas. There are dozens of versions, under various names like WriteDVD!, WriteCD-RW, WriteUDF!, WriteUDO! [for Mac], FormatUDF!, ReadDVD!, FixDVD!, FixUDF!, Disk Drive Tune Up, DVD-RAM TuneUp Pro [Mac] and ArchivistPro Hard Disk Edition. The various versions work with specific hardware configurations under some operating systems. Maybe these versions were demos to demonstrate some specific capabilities for specific media/hardware/operating system releases. I have checked out many of these UDF programs by SAI on a dedicated near-virgin operating system selection, to avoid corruptions.

WriteUDF! v1.0.0.4 can quick format a USB HDD to UDF under WinXP SP2. Other versions have other capabilities, some run only under Win9x, others only under WinXP. it's a challenging and interesting heap of semi-finished products, at least when it comes to magnetic media (HDDs, LS-120, zip, jaz, regular floppies, clik! disks, SDHC etc). I assume the SAI software works Ok with plastic media (DVDs, etc), which was probably the main interest of OSTA. BTW, a higher version here probably just indicates that it was prepared at a later point in time. Currently, to me, the only alternative to a SAI version is another SAI version, although I haven't spent much time looking.

Edited by Multibooter, 22 July 2012 - 03:51 PM.


#9
rloew

rloew

    MSFN Expert

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,083 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

FAT-32 can be definitely be extended to 16TiB with 4K Sectors. This can be done with or without USB.

Getting Win9x/ME and 2k/XP to understand and use 4 kiB sectors, in a manufacturer agnostic way, seems to me one of the most pressing projects, ATM, since 3 TB HDDs are already out there. :yes:

Getting a 3TB USB Drive to work with Windows 9x was fairly easy. Getting a 3 TB SATA Drive to work was much more complicated as it involved supporting DOS as well as upgrading the Disk Driver. A DDO is also needed if 4KB Sector emulation is required.
Ye who enter my domain. Beware! Lest you become educated in the mysteries of the universe and suffer forever from the desire to know more.

#10
Multibooter

Multibooter

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 896 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

I'm not sure what the point of using UDF with Windows 9X is.

UDF v1.02 is one of the file systems which Win98 understands and which is not tied to Microsoft. Increased knowledge about UDF under Win98 may lead to surprising results. Maybe it will eventually be possible to burn a DL-DVD from an 8GB iso on a UDF-formatted archive HDD, under Win98.

Even if the File System can handle larger files, Windows 9x will not handle them. You need my Large File Emulator to do that.

I have double-clicked under Win98 on an 8GB .iso image of a DL DVD on the UDF-formatted HDD. The .iso image opened fine in UltraISO v9.3.6.2750. When I extracted under Win98 the files in the 8GB .iso image, all files extracted, but about half of them had a different content from the files on the original DL-DVD, the other half of the files were identical to the files on the original DL-DVD. The same happened when I extracted the 8GB .iso file under Win98 with WinRAR and MagicISO. IsoBuster 2.5.0.0 encountered bad sectors [non-existent in the original files] in some files when trying to extract the 8GB .iso under Win98.

What is interesting in this experiment is that an 8GB file could be opened under Win98 if the 8GB file was residing on UDF v1.02 media, but something during the processing/extraction went wrong, perhaps because of some glitch in Win98. WinRAR, UltraISO and MagicISO completed the extraction of the 8GB file under Win98 without an error message, but again, about half of the stuff extracted by them was incorrect. Maybe, with a patch, or with a modification of your Large File Emulator, the 4GB file size barrier under Win98 can be broken with UDF media.

Experiments under Win98 can probably be made just as well with 8GB etc iso files on UDF-formatted blu-ray BD-RE media.

The Read-Only limitation can be bypassed by doing raw Disk I/O so it is not secure.

It's a file system driver limitation, so I doubt that malware will be able to overcome this.

Edited by Multibooter, 21 July 2012 - 09:20 PM.


#11
rloew

rloew

    MSFN Expert

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,083 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

I'm not sure what the point of using UDF with Windows 9X is.

UDF v1.02 is one of the file systems which Win98 understands and which is not tied to Microsoft. Increased knowledge about UDF under Win98 may lead to surprising results. Maybe it will eventually be possible to burn a DL-DVD from an 8GB iso on a UDF-formatted archive HDD, under Win98.

Probably. I already created an ISO/Joliet Formatted Hard Disk using 2K Sector Emulation that was readable under Windows 9x. It was from a CD so it could always be reburned.

Even if the File System can handle larger files, Windows 9x will not handle them. You need my Large File Emulator to do that.

I have double-clicked under Win98 on an 8GB .iso image of a DL DVD on the UDF-formatted HDD. The .iso image opened fine in UltraISO v9.3.6.2750. When I extracted under Win98 the files in the 8GB .iso image, all files extracted, but about half of them had a different content from the files on the original DL-DVD, the other half of the files were identical to the files on the original DL-DVD. The same happened when I extracted the 8GB .iso file under Win98 with WinRAR and MagicISO. IsoBuster 2.5.0.0 encountered bad sectors [non-existent in the original files] in some files when trying to extract the 8GB .iso under Win98.

What is interesting in this experiment is that an 8GB file could be opened under Win98 if the 8GB file was residing on UDF v1.02 media, but something during the processing/extraction went wrong, perhaps because of some glitch in Win98. WinRAR, UltraISO and MagicISO completed the extraction of the 8GB file under Win98 without an error message, but again, about half of the stuff extracted by them was incorrect. Maybe, with a patch, or with a modification of your Large File Emulator, the 4GB file size barrier under Win98 can be broken with UDF media.

Experiments under Win98 can probably be made just as well with 8GB etc iso files on UDF-formatted blu-ray BD-RE media.

The internal structures used for File I/O are 32-Bits. This is why no File System can truly handle more than 4GiB Files. You may not get an error but the data will be wrong.
My Large File Emulator simulates a larger File at the User API by creating multiple smaller files. This is why it works with FAT32. It won't help with actual large files on an UDF Partition.
I already have created a Bootable Read/Write BD-RE that looks like a 23GB Floppy Disk, but it uses FAT32.

The Read-Only limitation can be bypassed by doing raw Disk I/O so it is not secure.

It's a file system driver limitation, so I doubt that malware will be able to overcome this.

Raw Disk I/O bypasses the File System Driver so smart malware could change even a "Read-Only" File System.
Ye who enter my domain. Beware! Lest you become educated in the mysteries of the universe and suffer forever from the desire to know more.

#12
dencorso

dencorso

    Adiuvat plus qui nihil obstat

  • Super Moderator
  • 5,756 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

What about a DDO that reads a GPT device and presents it to 9x/ME/2k/XP as a 4 KiB (or maybe 2 KiB) sectored FAT device? Wouldn't that solve all problems at the same time? Of course, a DOS patch would be needed, too, for 9x/ME.

#13
Multibooter

Multibooter

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 896 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

I already created an ISO/Joliet Formatted Hard Disk using 2K Sector Emulation that was readable under Windows 9x. It was from a CD so it could always be reburned.

Wow! How did you format the HDD to ISO/Joliet exactly? How large was the formatted HDD?

The internal structures used for File I/O are 32-Bits. This is why no File System can truly handle more than 4GiB Files. You may not get an error but the data will be wrong.

What gives me still a glimmer of hope is that about half the files extracted from the 8GB file under Win98 were Ok. If something doesn't work, then often all or most results are bad, but just 50%. Or do the 50% Ok files reflect 4GB accessible, and 4GB not accessible?

Maybe 90% of the files extracted Ok from the 8GB iso seem to have been in a perhaps contiguous chunk of the iso, i.e. all files in the folders DB075 to DB119 of the extracted iso were identical to those on the DVD, while most files in the folders DB001 to DB069 of the 8GB .iso had completely different content (but identical file names and file sizes).

My Large File Emulator simulates a larger File at the User API by creating multiple smaller files. This is why it works with FAT32. It won't help with actual large files on an UDF Partition.

My intention was to extract an 8GB file into small components, not to create an 8GB file

Raw Disk I/O bypasses the File System Driver so smart malware could change even a "Read-Only" File System.

Whether UDF is read-only or read-and-write depends on the file system driver used. The MS UDF file system driver under Win98SE allows only reading from UDF files, while the SAI UDF file system driver allows reading and writing. The UDF software from SAI comes with a SAI file system switching utility, which allows to switch between the MS and the SAI file system drivers. After switching the file system driver you have to reboot. The Windows 98 Resource Kit contains some info about UDF under Win98 (pp. 1312-1319, 1213, 442, 467).

#14
rloew

rloew

    MSFN Expert

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,083 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

I already created an ISO/Joliet Formatted Hard Disk using 2K Sector Emulation that was readable under Windows 9x. It was from a CD so it could always be reburned.

Wow! How did you format the HDD to ISO/Joliet exactly? How large was the formatted HDD?

I used my RFDISK Program to create a custom MBR and set a flag in it to indicate 2K Sector Emulation. I rebooted into DOS using my DDO and copied an ISO directly to the Hard Drive except for Sector 0. After rebooting again I could access it from Windows. The formatted HD was the size of the ISO. Not particularly efficient but it worked. Using my ISO writer and Large File Emulator, I could make any size ISO. This of course requires my Terabyte Plus Patches to emulate and support the 2K Sectors.

The internal structures used for File I/O are 32-Bits. This is why no File System can truly handle more than 4GiB Files. You may not get an error but the data will be wrong.

What gives me still a glimmer of hope is that about half the files extracted from the 8GB file under Win98 were Ok. If something doesn't work, then often all or most results are bad, but just 50%. Or do the 50% Ok files reflect 4GB accessible, and 4GB not accessible?

Maybe 90% of the files extracted Ok from the 8GB iso seem to have been in a perhaps contiguous chunk of the iso, i.e. all files in the folders DB075 to DB119 of the extracted iso were identical to those on the DVD, while most files in the folders DB001 to DB069 of the 8GB .iso had completely different content (but identical file names and file sizes).

The 4GiB limitation is on the size of the files not the entire FileSystem, but if you have created an Image (ISO) File to extract from rather than extracting from the original media, the limit applies.
All of the Directories and File Info are near the beginning of the Disk. This is why all Filenames and attributes appear correct, even if the File Data is near the end. The first 4GiB of data extracted correctly, but the remainder was garbage.

My Large File Emulator simulates a larger File at the User API by creating multiple smaller files. This is why it works with FAT32. It won't help with actual large files on an UDF Partition.

My intention was to extract an 8GB file into small components, not to create an 8GB file

The problem is you created an 8GB ISO File. You would have had to rip the DVD-DL with my Large File Emulator active to create the Emulated ISO File, then you could extract from it.

Raw Disk I/O bypasses the File System Driver so smart malware could change even a "Read-Only" File System.

Whether UDF is read-only or read-and-write depends on the file system driver used. The MS UDF file system driver under Win98SE allows only reading from UDF files, while the SAI UDF file system driver allows reading and writing. The UDF software from SAI comes with a SAI file system switching utility, which allows to switch between the MS and the SAI file system drivers. After switching the file system driver you have to reboot. The Windows 98 Resource Kit contains some info about UDF under Win98 (pp. 1312-1319, 1213, 442, 467).

True. But what I said still applies.

@Dencorso: I have been experimenting with a GPT Booter but DOS and Windows would have to be modified to Enumerate GPT Partitions.
I already created a MBR extension that supports 512TiB with 512 Byte Sectors, more with larger ones, that only required relatively simple Patches. It is already in my Terabyte Plus Package along with the Partitioning Tool and Formatter that supports it.
2K and XP are another story entirely. They would only use the DDO during initial loading and would revert afterwards. Implementing the MBR Extension would be less complicated.
Ye who enter my domain. Beware! Lest you become educated in the mysteries of the universe and suffer forever from the desire to know more.

#15
jaclaz

jaclaz

    The Finder

  • Developer
  • 13,989 posts
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
As often happens OT :ph34r:, but not much, it seems like our good Linux friends have a distinctive advantage on this, though it *seems* like also Vista :w00t: and 7 users have it:
http://superuser.com...usb-flash-drive
http://serverfault.c...rd-drive-as-udf

About iso's used on hard disk one can use a hybrid .iso allright, some interesting things here :yes: :
http://reboot.pro/9916/


jaclaz

#16
Multibooter

Multibooter

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 896 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Did you find an alternative? Posted Image


... it seems like our good Linux friends have a distinctive advantage on this, though it *seems* like also Vista :w00t: and 7 users have it: ... http://serverfault.c...rd-drive-as-udf

Thanks jaclaz, a very interesting link, here a quote from it:

I know two ways to format a hard drive as UDF:

* Windows Vista or later: "format x: /fs:UDF" (don't use /q ! )
* Linux: "mkudffs --media-type=hd --blocksize=512 /dev/sdx"
http://serverfault.c...rd-drive-as-udf

With which versions of UDF can Vista and Linux format HDDs?

I have dumped Vista from my computer, so I cannot check. The book "Windows Vista Inside Out" (MS Press, 2007, pp.921-923) states that Windows Vista supports UDF v1.50 thru 2.60. "Note that all of these variants are afforded read-write support by Windows Vista, and that none of them are supported in any form on Win9x platforms". On first glance it appears to me that the purpose of UDF 2.50 and UDF 2.60 was to introduce incompatibilities so that companies would have to upgrade their older windows and transfer money to MS. Reminds me somehow of the incompatibilities of the various Word, etc formats.

I have formatted the HDD to UDF v1.02, which can be read by Win98SE and WinXP without special software. In the revision history of UDF http://web.archive.o...myhome/udf.html Wenguang states:
"UDF 1.50 adds virtual partition and sparable partition. Virtual partition allows a write-once media (CD-R, DVD-R and DVD+R) appears as an overwritable media. A write-once media appears as an overwritable floppy (but hundreds or thousands times larger), except that its available space keeps decreasing as you use it. Even removing files cannot reclaim space. The sparable partition performs defect management on the media, similar to what the hard drive firmware does on modern hard drives... A sparable partition makes a disc with many defects appear as a good one with a contiguous logical space. "

So UDF 1.50, the next version after v1.02, adds features for plastic media, which are probably not needed for HDDs, which have their own defect management. Any ideas which version of UDF is the best for HDDs? WriteUDF! v1.0.0.4 can format under WinXP SP2 the UDF versions from 1.02 thru 2.60, so for the sake of compatibility I chose UDF 1.02.

Maybe these versions were demos to demonstrate some specific capabilities for specific media/hardware/operating system releases.

There may exist a newer version of "WriteUDF! UDF Data Writer" v1.0.3 for Windows Vista http://www.cdrinfo.c...px?NewsId=22745 although I didn't see it for sale at Digital River when I looked 3 years ago. The product announcement by cdrinfo.com dated March 12, 2008 states: "The software is available from 20 March 2008"

Here is a listing of the file systems supported by Windows 8, but without an indication of the UDF version numbers supported: http://technet.micro.../query/aa383358 Can Windows Vista, 7 and 8 read HDDs formatted to UDF 1.02?

Edited by Multibooter, 22 July 2012 - 12:11 PM.


#17
dencorso

dencorso

    Adiuvat plus qui nihil obstat

  • Super Moderator
  • 5,756 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

There are currently various versions of UDF used in the market:

* v1.02 - Basic file system as used by DVD video players (i.e. rental movies)
* v1.50 - Support for CD-R and CD-RW media
* v2.00 - Support for NT streaming.
* v2.01 - Support for RealTime Video Recording Files (ability to copy, read and delete VRO files).
* v2.50 - Support for the Metadata Partition facilitating metadata clustering and optional duplication of file system information.
* v2.60 - Support for Pseudo OverWrite capability on sequentially recordable BD-R media for consumer recorders.

The problem is that not all Windows and Mac operating systems can always read UDF formatted volumes. For example, Windows NT does not provide support for reading UDF disks at all. Win 98SE, 2000 and ME provide support for v1.02 and limited support for v1.5 (it doesn't handle CD-RW), and don't support UDF v2.00, 2.01, 2.50 or 2.60 at all. Also, the native Windows UDF reader frequently has difficulty with discs formatted with Roxio's proprietary version of UDF.

The above quotation is from this page (preserved by the Internet Archive).

  • The version of Microsoft Windows that you are using may not support the UDF version that is used on the disc. Most DVD-ROM/video that contain UDF 1.02 CD or DVD R/RW content that was recorded by "drag-and-drop" software will contain UDF 1.5 or later. Windows XP supports UDF 1.02, 1.5, and 2.01
  • Certain "drag-and-drop" recording programs (for example, the Adaptec/Roxio DirectCD program) allow the use of "compression" when you format discs. Compression is not a part of the OSTA UDF standard, and discs that have compression may not be readable by any UDF reader except readers from that software vendor



#18
Multibooter

Multibooter

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 896 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

As often happens OT :ph34r:, but not much, it seems like our good Linux friends have a distinctive advantage on this, though it *seems* like also Vista :w00t: and 7 users have it: http://superuser.com...usb-flash-drive

Disk Drive Tune Up v3.1.2 under Win98SE can format SDHC cards in a USB SDHC card reader. I just stuck an old 16GB SDHC card formatted to UDF 1.02 into an SDHC card reader and WinXP SP2 could read it Ok, without any special software.

Here an older link http://www.msfn.org/...post__p__891214
The subsequent posting #32 there http://www.msfn.org/...post__p__891251 by Offler may also be of interest:
"I was able to acess 8gb files, even write 8gb files with video creating program" (under Win98???)

#19
Multibooter

Multibooter

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 896 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

The above quotation is from this page (preserved by the Internet Archive).

I would doubt that ReadDVD! v2.0 for MS Vista works for UDF-formatted HDDs, but I haven't tried it. Only a subset of builds/versions of SAI software works with UDF-formatted HDDs. When SAI used the term "Disk" they usually meant optical (plastic) media, not hard disk drives. Identifying whether a specific build/version works with specific magnetic media is a matter of trial and error, just like looking for undocumented features. And when a product announcement said that it works with Win2000 or WinXP - which version of Win2000 or WinXP did SAI mean? And some claims that a product works on a HDD I have not been able to confirm. Very time-consuming experimentation.

Here is an old posting of mine when I was fiddling around with SAI UDF software which works on removable media, but not on hard disk drives under WinXP http://www.msfn.org/...r-as-removable/

Here a product announcement of ReadDVD! v2.0 for MS Windows Vista http://www.cdrinfo.c...px?NewsId=22294 Again this is a READER, not a writer of UDF, probably intended for users of Win2000/XP (Win98???) permitting access to stuff created by and for Windows Vista, i.e. UDF 2.50 and UDF 2.60.

Edited by Multibooter, 22 July 2012 - 02:40 PM.


#20
Multibooter

Multibooter

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 896 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag
MS Live File System
MS Live File System seems to be a modification of UDF with incompatibilities so that it doesn't work on operating systems other than Microsoft XP and higher. The English-language wikipedia http://en.wikipedia....ive_File_System has hardly any information about it, so here a link to the German-language page with content http://de.wikipedia....ive_File_System

"Kompatibilität[:] Das Livedateisystem ist nach Angaben von Microsoft nur mit Microsoft Windows XP und späteren Versionen des Betriebssystems Microsoft Windows kompatibel. Andere Betriebssysteme werden nicht unterstützt... LFS implementiert nicht die im UDF-Standard vorgesehenen Access Control Listen und eine Implementierung ist auch nicht geplant"

So a HDD formatted under Vista to MS-modded UDF 2.5 may not be a "Universal Disk Format" anymore, but just a "DF" (="Disk Format"). Nearly all operating systems can read UDF 1.02, except for DOS or MS Win3.x in the listing at http://en.wikipedia....sal_Disk_Format No idea whether Windows 7 or 8 use MS-modded UDF versions.

Edited by Multibooter, 22 July 2012 - 03:45 PM.


#21
LoneCrusader

LoneCrusader

    Resistere pro causa resistentiam.

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 799 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

Nearly all operating systems can read UDF 1.02, except for DOS or MS Win3.x in the listing at http://en.wikipedia....sal_Disk_Format

Technically that page should differentiate versions of Windows 9x. Windows 95 does NOT natively support UDF. Thanks to rloew, UDF 1.02 support is now available for Windows 95, but before this would have required third-party reader/writer software.

Edited by LoneCrusader, 22 July 2012 - 03:54 PM.


#22
Multibooter

Multibooter

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 896 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag
MS Live File System and non-compliant UDF file structures
Here an excerpt of a product description of FixUDF of 3 years ago, which apparently is not available at the internet anymore:

"Why use our Fix Utilities? ... non-compliant UDF file structures (the OSTA standard may not have been used when the file structure was created. For example Roxio's DirectCD ™, BHA's B's Clip ™ and Aplix's PacketMan ™ UDF file system utilities create a non-standard UDF format, and therefore are not interchangeable with other kinds of systems.)"

Here another excerpt about FixUDF (and other SAI products): "The UDF format for disk file structures [of SAI products] is based on the standard developed by the Optical Storage Association (OSTA)."

So I could imagine that an external UDF-formatted HDD, written to by the MS-modded UDF and by e.g. WriteUDF, could eventually get corrupted.

BTW FixUDF repairs only UDF 1.02, 1.50 2.0 and 2.01, NOT 2.50 or 2.60, so UDF 2.50 and UDF 2.60 can be rejected because of a lack of diagnostic/repair utilities.

#23
Multibooter

Multibooter

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 896 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag


Nearly all operating systems can read UDF 1.02, except for DOS or MS Win3.x in the listing at http://en.wikipedia....sal_Disk_Format

Technically that page should differentiate versions of Windows 9x. Windows 95 does NOT natively support UDF. Thanks to rloew, UDF 1.02 support is now available for Windows 95, but before this would have required third-party reader/writer software.

Hi LoneCrusader,
Not everything in wikipedia is correct :w00t: CP/M, for example, was omitted from that list of operating systems
IsoBuster v2.5.0.0 of 23-Dec-2008 (there is also a build 2.5.0.0 of 19-Dec-2013) is the last version for Win9x and according to the product description supports Win95 http://web.archive.o...-projects.net/? IsoBuster reads basically anything :thumbup written onto plastic, at least what's computer-readable, without stability issues as with the Adaptec UDF reader.

Edited by Multibooter, 22 July 2012 - 04:52 PM.


#24
Multibooter

Multibooter

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 896 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

As far as I know WriteUDF! is no longer available and, BTW, the Software Architects, Inc. is no more, AFAIK.

The products of Software Architects appear indeed to be no longer available at digitalriver.com , except perhaps in Japanese, google search string: "site:digitalriver.com softarch".

maybe: http://store.digital...ductID.43318000 or http://store.digital...SiteID=softarch

Edited by Multibooter, 22 July 2012 - 05:49 PM.


#25
LoneCrusader

LoneCrusader

    Resistere pro causa resistentiam.

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 799 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

Not everything in wikipedia is correct :w00t:

Naturally. :angel
Just pointing it out for clarification here, as this is a Windows 9x forum, and since you specifically named DOS and Win 3.x as being unable to read it, it gives the impression that Windows 95 would be able to read it.

Do we have any Wikipedia editors present that would care to fix it there? :lol:




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



How to remove advertisement from MSFN