anybody else having problem integrating this into a win 7hp iso? as mine keep coming up with errors during the windows install
Login to Account Create an Account
Post-SP1 updates for Windows 7 (Updated 11/03/2014)
Posted 27 December 2013 - 02:31 PM
Posted 28 December 2013 - 09:09 AM
That's because you probably integrated some updates that are not meant to be integrated into a offline image, make a new image but be sure not to include these updates below (assuming you used my latest version of my ULZ's):-
Posted 30 December 2013 - 11:55 AM
So on the x86 version, it looks like you don't include kb2883150?
Posted 30 December 2013 - 12:53 PM
That's because this month it was superseded by KB2893984
Posted 30 December 2013 - 04:49 PM
new to this thread, and thus my question may be stupid (?):
In what order should I install the updates ? By KB numbers or any other way ?
I am creating a Win 7 x64 SP1 disc (it's a clean SP1 disc, it has got no updates/fixes but SP1 and KB976902.)
Now I used WAIK and dism (command line) to do some customizing and to get rid of some packages that I don't want in my image.
I also would like to try integrate IE11 - I manually got the 9 updates which IE11 downloads automatically before it actually installs itself - and I know the order in which they should be installed.
Altough, at first time I integrated them regardless the order, and after windows 7 had been installed, I installed IE11 offline and it worked fine - so probably here the order of installing those 9 does not matter.
but let's forget integrating IE11, that's not for this thread.
So now I have the clean x64 SP1 image installed on my notebook, with only IE11 added after installation (IE8 was removed with dism).
And I have the .iso image which is exactly the same as the system installed, only IE11 is not integrated.
I would like to integrate updates/hotfixes to this image - preferably using dism (cmd) - I'll make a simple batch file as I did for package removing.
I have updates which I downloaded using "Windows Update Downloader 2.50" - the list "Windows 7 SP1 x64 ENU (2013-12-10)".
I have "check for updates but let me choose..." option enabled in Windows Update, and it gives me a list of updates that MS suggests installing.
Well, I can even run and compare the two lists.
I just don't know in what order the updates should be installed ? by KB number? Should there be a separate order for security updates/non-security/optional/net framework ?
The other thing that came to my mind while writing to you ? the WUD list I dowloaded and used offers sp1 which I already have. Are the security updates/non-security/optional/net framework offered from that list all post SP1 ?
And if any updates had got superseded by others are they excluded from your list ?
great work, keep it up mate; Happy New Year! (to everybody on msfn)
Posted 30 December 2013 - 06:24 PM
Geez some questions, but I'll do my best to answer them:-
1) IE11 requires only 5 updates to be integrated before you can integrate IE11, as some updates that MS suggests have been superseded by newer updates. I have a dedicated IE11 Thread with all the downloads available: http://www.msfn.org/...dated-10122013/
2) Only download Updates from Security, Non-Security and .NET Framework 3.5.1 sections, some updates come with Non-Integrate at the end, which obviously means you can't integrate those updates into your offline image. And it doesn't really matter which order you integrate them.
3) Nearly all updates are post-sp1, except for KB971033, KB917607, KB976002 and few others which were released when Win7 first come out.
Thanks, Happy New year to you
Posted 02 January 2014 - 05:10 PM
thanks for help and the extra info.
indeed 5 updates are enough to make it work
Posted 03 January 2014 - 01:14 PM
Something I've discovered working with your UL. Was having problems with integrated ISO failing setup in a virtualbox VM, and after a good couple days of debugging, discovered the culprit was KB2819745, Windows Management Framework 4.0. The error was after first reset, it would say "failure to configure one or more Windows components" or something like that.
Reading the KB article it looks like .net 4.5 is a prerequisite, which means this update is not integratable into an offline image, unless there's some trick I don't know about.
Target OS is Win 7 Enterprise x86 SP1.
Posted 03 January 2014 - 04:54 PM
Spot on, WMF 4.0 requires .NET 4.5 as a minimum, but since we cannot integrate 4.5 (no thanks to MS) into the offline image, it will have to be installed after you've installed Win7.
Unless you use reverse integration, which is a lengthy process or you can use a script to initiate setup programs after install of 7 but before you reach the oobe screen (place where enter your login details, product key, etc) to automatically install 4.5/4.5.1 and WMF4.0.
In the next ULZ's, I'll put a non-integrate warning for WMF4.0!
Posted 03 January 2014 - 10:46 PM
Yeah that would probably be good for anyone else like me, using WUD to get the updates then using Wintoolkit to integrate them. I'm trying to build an iso now with all updates except this one, so I guess we'll see how that goes. Hopefully no more nasty surprises...
OK so there were no more nasty surprises, setup installed successfully in virtualbox, setuperr.log 0 bytes. BUT... upon running WU in the guest, it reports some needed updates:
kb2861855 - remote desktop
kb2862152 - directaccess
kb2868725 - disable rc4
kb2598845 - ie8 only
kb2574819 - remote desktop
kb2592687 - remote desktop
This list does not include kb2533552 which you reported as can't-integrate, or the hated kb971033.
BTW target OS = Win 7 Enterprise SP1 x86
Edited by Nameless Mofo, 04 January 2014 - 03:02 AM.
Posted 04 January 2014 - 04:03 PM
Hmm i wondered why i didnt get any errors when integrating WMF 4.0. Apparently i used my sysprepped ISO that had .NET 4.5 integrated. Lucky me i guess..
Posted 20 January 2014 - 01:53 PM
Posted 23 January 2014 - 01:40 AM
@steven4554 maybe have the non integrateable (offline) patches in a seperate folder (named non-integrateable) so that people dont try integrate them causing errors
Posted 23 January 2014 - 11:37 PM
Thanks for the suggestion. I've already put a warning next to the updates that cannot be integrated, so I don't see the point in creating another section in the lists.
Posted 12 February 2014 - 02:14 PM
Thanks Steven, you really spoil us here!
Posted 21 February 2014 - 03:27 AM
Many thanks as always Steven.
Anyone else getting KB2912390 being offered after install despite being integrated as well?
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users
ScoutJet (1), Google (3)