sorry for this 2nd post ... i've tried a lot of times to submit a modified post (even reported it to the site admins) but just wouldn't go through ... always came out blank in the 1st post with only the attachments left
------------------------------------------------
hi! i encountered lots of roadblocks in my recent run (after being away from it for a long time

) ... during the batch processing, i encountered lots of instances of
0 File(s) copied, such as:
WindowsMedia9-KB969878-x86-ENU.exe,
WindowsXP-KB894871-x86-ENU.exe - i'll take this out (based on this)
WindowsXP-KB894871-x86-Symbols-ENU.exe - i'll take this out (based on this)
WindowsXP-KB914440-v12-x86-ENU.exe
WindowsXP-KB915865-v11-x86-ENU.exe
WindowsXP-KB958911-x86-ENU.exe
WindowsXP-KB967715-x86-ENU.exe
WindowsXP-KB969898-x86-ENU.exe - hasn't support for active killbits been dropped (here)?
WindowsXP-KB973525-x86-ENU.exe - hasn't support for active killbits been dropped (here)?
KB961742-v3.exe
i don't think i was able to capture all of
0 File(s) copied instances though. there could be more.
along the way too, the run was halted by:
E:\HFSlip179\TEMP\AAO\MSWINATL.CAT already exists. Overwrite it ?
[Y]es, [N]o, [A]ll, n[E]ver, [R]ename, [Q]uit
& i answered
n[E]ver to stop the succeeding numerous prompts.
the other .cats but not all were:
MSWINCRT.CAT,
MSWINMFC.CAT
EDIT: had conversations with Kelsenellenelvian who prepared
Kels_Runtimes_addon_v6.rar. he thinks it's most likely because .cats actually exist in couple of the asms folders & suggests removing asms folder from the runtimes & manually drop it into I386 folder. in my last successful build though using
hfslip-1.5.0, i had an earlier ver of his pack:
Kels_Runtimes_addon_v2.6.6.CAB (the structure's still basically the same) & it worked without hiccups. could there have been code modifications in
hfslip-1.7.9 that might have affected the way this is processed now?
for some specific addons, i got these instances:
Processing "substituted_addon_name".7z
1 File(s) copied
0 File(s) copied
what could be wrong in these kind of instances? just for reference, i've inserted here an inquiry i had before:
Kiki Burgh, on May 31 2006, 04:26 AM, said:
i would just like to ask if these lines have in any way negative factor in SOURCESS?
... these are just bits that caught my attention while watching the script do its thing ...
i may not have caught everything though that shows 0 files copied ...
.
.
.
would it be quite safe to assume that newer files were already present in that is why nothing needs to be overwritten? or HFSLIP does not deal with these updates as all of these are not in our list of updates? btw, these are unofficial hotfixes
i know i do not need some of these & i am about to remove them from HF directory

i just like to know how these are treated ...
Tomcat76, on May 31 2006, 05:36 AM, said:
HFSLIP deletes "junk" files, and sometimes hotfixes are given special treatment. In these cases it's possible that no additional files are left to be copied over after a hotfix has been processed completely. So it's normal. I can only get rid of the "0 files copied" message by disabling all copy output, but I think most people would prefer to see the names of the binaries that are processed.
tp, your thoughts? thanks!
while other instances looked like these:
Processing "substituted_addon_ name"_v1.1.7z
'0' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
'1' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
'0' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
'1' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
0 File(s) copied
Processing "substituted_addon_ name"_v1.1.7z
'HKLM' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
'CONFIGURE_PROGRAMS' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
during the text-based portion, i believe this to be directx related:
Setup cannot copy the file: d3dx9_24.dll ... this lasted until
d3dx9_41.dll.
same for
d3dx10.dll &
d3dx11_42.dll. how can i process
directx_aug2009_redist.exe better? in my last successful run, this had to be extracted & only select files were put in
HFCABS. would it be better to utilize .cabs &
HFCABS instead? what abt the other files? when extracted these are the x86 files i see:
Quote
BDANT.cab - is this to be included?
BDAXP.cab - is this to be included?
DSETUP.dll - is this to be included, this is a .dll?
dsetup32.dll - is this to be included, this is a .dll?
dxdllreg_x86.cab - is this to be included?
dxnt.cab - is this to be included?
DXSETUP.exe - is this to be included?
dxupdate.cab - is this to be included?
Feb2005_d3dx9_24_x86.cab
Apr2005_d3dx9_25_x86.cab
Jun2005_d3dx9_26_x86.cab
Aug2005_d3dx9_27_x86.cab
Oct2005_xinput_x86.cab
Dec2005_d3dx9_28_x86.cab
Feb2006_d3dx9_29_x86.cab
Feb2006_XACT_x86.cab
Apr2006_d3dx9_30_x86.cab
Apr2006_MDX1_x86.cab - is MDX1 supported?
Apr2006_MDX1_x86_Archive.cab - is MDX1 supported?
Apr2006_XACT_x86.cab
Apr2006_xinput_x86.cab
JUN2006_XACT_x86.cab
AUG2006_XACT_x86.cab
AUG2006_xinput_x86.cab
OCT2006_d3dx9_31_x86.cab
OCT2006_XACT_x86.cab
DEC2006_d3dx10_00_x86.cab
DEC2006_d3dx9_32_x86.cab
DEC2006_XACT_x86.cab
FEB2007_XACT_x86.cab
APR2007_d3dx10_33_x86.cab
APR2007_d3dx9_33_x86.cab
APR2007_XACT_x86.cab
APR2007_xinput_x86.cab
JUN2007_d3dx10_34_x86.cab
JUN2007_d3dx9_34_x86.cab
JUN2007_XACT_x86.cab
AUG2007_d3dx10_35_x86.cab
AUG2007_d3dx9_35_x86.cab
AUG2007_XACT_x86.cab
Nov2007_d3dx10_36_x86.cab
Nov2007_d3dx9_36_x86.cab
NOV2007_X3DAudio_x86.cab - is X3DAudio supported?
NOV2007_XACT_x86.cab
Mar2008_d3dx10_37_x86.cab
Mar2008_d3dx9_37_x86.cab
Mar2008_X3DAudio_x86.cab - is X3DAudio supported?
Mar2008_XACT_x86.cab
Mar2008_XAudio_x86.cab - is X3DAudio supported?
JUN2008_d3dx10_38_x86.cab
JUN2008_d3dx9_38_x86.cab
JUN2008_X3DAudio_x86.cab - is X3DAudio supported?
JUN2008_XACT_x86.cab
JUN2008_XAudio_x86.cab - is X3DAudio supported?
Aug2008_d3dx10_39_x86.cab
Aug2008_d3dx9_39_x86.cab
Aug2008_XACT_x86.cab
Aug2008_XAudio_x86.cab - is X3DAudio supported?
Nov2008_d3dx10_40_x86.cab
Nov2008_d3dx9_40_x86.cab
Nov2008_X3DAudio_x86.cab - is X3DAudio supported?
Nov2008_XACT_x86.cab
Nov2008_XAudio_x86.cab - is X3DAudio supported?
Mar2009_d3dx10_41_x86.cab
Mar2009_d3dx9_41_x86.cab
Mar2009_X3DAudio_x86.cab - is X3DAudio supported?
Mar2009_XACT_x86.cab
Mar2009_XAudio_x86.cab - is X3DAudio supported?
Aug2009_D3DCompiler_42_x86.cab - is D3Decompiler supported?
Aug2009_d3dcsx_42_x86.cab
Aug2009_d3dx10_42_x86.cab
Aug2009_d3dx11_42_x86.cab
Aug2009_d3dx9_42_x86.cab
Aug2009_XACT_x86.cab
Aug2009_XAudio_x86.cab - is X3DAudio supported?
is it just me or has directx icon changed?
i had many powershell related errors too but i don't recall putting any powershell update/hotfix/patch in my run. upon tracing the extensions, i suppose these came from
WindowsXP-KB968930-x86-ENG.exe.
to add to this, during text setup, all my wallpapers were not copied. (i had these setup like it was in my last successful run abt a couple of years ago:
HFEXPERT\WIN\Web\Wallpaper).
also had copy prob with
cWnd.exe.
please look at the attached pics. i've attached too my hfslip.log. appreciate the support.

i'm trying new runs as we speak taking out some items.
hey Mim0, could you please cross-ref this with our current XP list, esp
WindowsXP-KB968930-x86-ENG.exe. (this 1 has given me lots of errors. could there be other HF as requisites for this?) seems like no new binaries are taken from the above HFs i reported ... or perhaps i should have those in another directory instead of
HF ... your thoughts? thanks!
EDIT:i have confirmed that
WindowsXP-KB968930-x86-ENG.exe has caused a lot of errors during text mode of setup. tried it even with & without
WindowsXP-KB926139-v2-x86-ENU in
HF too to see if it could address
.ps1xml errors but to no avail.
This post has been edited by PC_LOAD_LETTER: 16 February 2010 - 10:34 AM
Reason for edit: fixed bbcode for new IPB version