Explorer09 Posted November 16, 2012 Share Posted November 16, 2012 I think it's time for Mimo to sign up an account in GitHub, and host the file-checker there. How would that be?At least for me, I can commit the code as soon as MS (and Adobe) release a new update, saving time for jvidal and other people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvidal Posted November 17, 2012 Share Posted November 17, 2012 Excuse my ignorance, but what is github?Yet another filesharing service? OR is it sumthin' else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Explorer09 Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 Excuse my ignorance, but what is github?Yet another filesharing service? OR is it sumthin' else?It's not just for file sharing, it's for code sharing.Some of the open-source software host their source code there. And people can make code commits or file bugs easily in GitHub. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvidal Posted November 19, 2012 Share Posted November 19, 2012 Alright, thx for the info... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dziubek Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 (edited) Found on the Web:Blackwingcat has found a new version for Root Certificates [November 2012] (KB931125) It's v37.0.2195.5 Link to his post: http://www.msfn.org/...ost__p__1019445 Link to file: http://www.download....en/rootsupd.exeupd:It's v37.0.2195.5 Edited November 22, 2012 by dziubek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mim0 Posted November 22, 2012 Author Share Posted November 22, 2012 new file-checker for XP:2012-11-22- Added: KB2727528 (MS12-072: Windows Shell)- Added: KB2761226 (MS12-075: Windows Kernel-Mode Drivers)- Added: Adobe Flash Player 11.5.502.110- Added: Malicious Software Removal Tool 4.14.6800.0- Removed: KB2731847 (MS12-055: Windows Kernel-Mode Drivers, v2, replaced by KB2761226)- Removed: Adobe Flash Player 11.4.402.287- Removed: Malicious Software Removal Tool 4.13.6701.0Download: HFSLIPFC v.2012/05/04 with WindowsXP-update-list v.2012/11/22 Regarding roots upd V37: could we trust this very-silent update? Should I add it to the list? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dziubek Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 Regarding roots upd V37: could we trust this very-silent update? Should I add it to the list?info form this topic:http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=128896#128896 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Explorer09 Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 (edited) Regarding roots upd V37: could we trust this very-silent update? Should I add it to the list?I think I should wait for a few days. MS didn't make an announcement about this update (yet). But, I can try installing it on a virtual machine and compare the difference.EDIT: Here is my brief compare result.(rootsupd.exe November 2012)In "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\AuthRoot\Certificates", 5 keys have been added by this update:06143151E02B45DDBADD5D8E56530DAAE328CF900C628F5C5570B1C957FAFD383FB03D7B7DD7B9C6585F7875BEE7433EB079EAAB7D05BB0F7AF2BCCCEABDA240440ABBD694930A01D09764C6C2D77966F138A330A4EA986BEB520BB11035876EFB9D7F1CThere are also 349 registry keys modified by this update in total:342 keys in "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\AuthRoot\Certificates",1 key in "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\CA\Certificates",6 keys in "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\ROOT\Certificates".EDIT2:I found another strange thing. Perhaps this is a bug in Microsoft, but the file modified date inside rootsupd.exe seems to be misleading or incorrect.For example, between the April and the November update, only these files are changed: rootsupd.inf, updroots.exe, updroots.sst.But two of the modified dates stay the same.Files inside the new rootsupd.exe (November 2012):05/31/2012 04:54 PM 91,136 ADVPACK.DLL11/02/2012 02:24 PM 75,116 authroots.sst08/29/2011 05:08 PM 16,562 delroots.sst07/24/2012 03:44 PM 7,273 roots.sst05/16/2011 03:16 PM 1,610 rootsupd.inf06/01/2012 11:48 AM 6,656 updroots.exe08/29/2011 05:08 PM 375,712 updroots.sst05/31/2012 04:55 PM 2,272 W95INF16.DLL05/31/2012 04:55 PM 4,608 W95INF32.DLL 9 File(s) 580,945 bytesFiles inside the old rootsupd.exe (April 2012):05/16/2011 02:52 PM 91,136 ADVPACK.DLL04/06/2012 12:07 PM 75,116 authroots.sst08/29/2011 05:08 PM 16,562 delroots.sst03/14/2012 12:29 PM 7,273 roots.sst05/16/2011 03:16 PM 1,610 rootsupd.inf05/18/2011 02:01 PM 5,632 updroots.exe08/29/2011 05:08 PM 368,180 updroots.sst05/16/2011 02:53 PM 2,272 W95INF16.DLL05/16/2011 02:53 PM 4,608 W95INF32.DLL 9 File(s) 572,389 bytes Edited November 23, 2012 by Explorer09 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZEUS__ Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 (edited) @Explorer0. also two updroots.exe in packages have some diferences. bolded.old one (April 2012)::5.632 bytes5.1.2484.05.1.2484.0Windows NT, Windows 32 bitApplicationİngilizce (A.B.D.), Unicode5.1.2484.0 (main.010529-2005)UPDROOTSMicrosoft® Windows® Operating System5.1.2484.0Microsoft Corporation© Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.UPDROOTSUPDROOTSnew one (November 2012):6.656 bytes5.2.3790.44565.2.3790.4456Debug, Private buildWindows NT, Windows 32 bitApplicationİngilizce (A.B.D.), Unicode5.2.3790.4456 built by: dnsrv(ansaboor)UPDROOTSMicrosoft® Windows® Operating System5.2.3790.4456Microsoft Corporation© Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.UPDROOTSUPDROOTSnew one has a flag that Debug, Private build Edited November 23, 2012 by ZEUS__ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Explorer09 Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 @Explorer0. also two updroots.exe in packages have some diferences. (sic) bolded.....new one has a flag that Debug, Private buildI knew the difference already, but you didn't notice that the new updroots.exe is bit-for-bit identical to the one inside the rvkroots.exe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZEUS__ Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 @Explorer0. also two updroots.exe in packages have some diferences. (sic) bolded.....new one has a flag that Debug, Private buildI knew the difference already, but you didn't notice that the new updroots.exe is bit-for-bit identical to the one inside the rvkroots.exe.you totally right, I just realized it sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dziubek Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 I found an error on the page:Bad location of the destination directory for the file WindowsXP-KB2761226-x86.reg.It should be HFSVCPACK instead of HF-----------------------------------------------------------Running HFSLIPFC v.2012/05/04 at 2012-11-24 14:47:52,56-----------------------------------------------------------unknown: HF\WindowsXP-KB2761226-x86.regmissing (S): HFSVCPACK\WindowsXP-KB2761226-x86.reg (Registry-File for MS12-075 (Windows Kernel-Mode Drivers)) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvidal Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 It's correct. The reg file goes in HFSVCPACK, not in HF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Explorer09 Posted November 25, 2012 Share Posted November 25, 2012 It's correct. The reg file goes in HFSVCPACK, not in HF.Only the latter (the file checker) is correct.The web page really misses the line about the reg file going to HFSVCPACK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvidal Posted November 25, 2012 Share Posted November 25, 2012 just a minor glitch. The important thing is the FC is correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now