[-X-]

Quote

How to obtain the latest Windows Update Agent
If Windows Update or Automatic Updates is turned on, the latest version of the Windows Update Agent will be automatically downloaded and installed on your computer. If you go to Windows Update before it gets installed automatically, you will see a message to install the Windows Update Agent:

Funny. I'm still on 7.4.7600.226 and get no prompt to upgrade.

We now need a URL to download it as

 http://download.windowsupdate.com/WindowsUpdate/redist/standalone/7.6.7600.256/WindowsUpdateAgent30-x86.exe

gives a 404.

EDIT: And here's why....

Quote

Notice
There is no standalone installer of the latest version of the Windows Update Agent (7.6.7600.256). The following are instructions on how to obtain version 7.4.7600.226 of the Windows Update Agent.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946928

This post has been edited by -X-: 09 June 2012 - 05:20 AM

[dziubek]

Microsoft Update Catalog Web Control 7.4.7057.249

[Mim0]

tomasz86, on 08 June 2012 - 04:49 AM, said:

I'd like to suggest changing this line in HFSLIP's script:

SET SW1=/quiet /norestart

to

SET SW1=/q /n /z

...

Yes I think it could be a good idea to use your switches. Bit I suggest to define (overwrite) them in the HFANSWER.INI. What do you think?

-X-, on 08 June 2012 - 06:13 AM, said:

Adobe Flash Player 11.3.300.257
...

THX for the info!!!

dziubek, on 09 June 2012 - 10:10 PM, said:

Microsoft Update Catalog Web Control 7.4.7057.249

Thx for the Info (but I don't have to change anything - the dl-link is still the same. Should I do something regarding version-check?)

This post has been edited by Mim0: 11 June 2012 - 04:36 AM

[dziubek]

Mim0, on 11 June 2012 - 04:25 AM, said:

]Thx for the Info (but I don't have to change anything - the dl-link is still the same. Should I do something regarding version-check?)

Do not have to, I gave this info for other users

[rulman]

KB2685939 replace KB2621440 & KB2570222
KB2709162 replace KB2641653
KB2707511 replace KB2633171
(IE)KB2699988 replace KB2675157

[-X-]

Actually it's....

KB2685939 replace KB2621440
KB2709162 reg entry replaces the KB2676562 reg entry. (the contents are the same)
KB2707511 replace KB2676562
The IE one is correct.

As is becoming more and more normal, Microsoft can't get it's head out of it's a** when it comes to bulletin replacement information.


BTW, Java got security updates today so update if you have it on your system.

This post has been edited by -X-: 12 June 2012 - 03:05 PM

[Mim0]

a small update before the big one (I had no time to upload this version before)

New file-checker for XP:

2012-06-11
- Added: Flash Player 11.3.300.257
- Removed: Flash Player 11.2.202.235

Download: HFSLIPFC v.2012/05/04 with WindowsXP-update-list v.2012/06/11

[Explorer09]

-X-, on 12 June 2012 - 02:54 PM, said:

Actually it's....

KB2685939 replace KB2621440
KB2709162 reg entry replaces the KB2676562 reg entry. (the contents are the same)
KB2707511 replace KB2676562
The IE one is correct.

As is becoming more and more normal, Microsoft can't get it's head out of it's a** when it comes to bulletin replacement information.


BTW, Java got security updates today so update if you have it on your system.

-X- got one thing wrong here. KB2707511 alone cannot replace KB2676562. It's the combination of KB2707511+KB2709162 that replaces KB2676562.

             | KB2676562     | KB2707511     | KB2709162
Win32k.sys   | 5.1.2600.6206 | no            | 5.1.2600.6228
(reg entry)  | yes           | no            | yes
Ntkrnlmp.exe | 5.1.2600.6206 | 5.1.2600.6223 | no
Ntkrnlpa.exe | 5.1.2600.6206 | 5.1.2600.6223 | no
Ntkrpamp.exe | 5.1.2600.6206 | 5.1.2600.6223 | no
Ntoskrnl.exe | 5.1.2600.6206 | 5.1.2600.6223 | no
(The "reg entry" mean the SessionImageSize registry entry. "No" means the update does not contain the file/registry.)

[dziubek]

Windows Update Agent 3.0 v7.6.7600.256

[jvidal]

just get the repacked installers by ricktendo, they seem to work fine and accept the same command line switches as the "official" versions.

[jvidal]

Got a question, guys. Does anyone know if the HFSLIP_PRE_TZ4 package is still needed? (.cab & .cmd)
I still have it in my hftools folder, but no idea if it does any good or is it enough with the latest tzone update...

bye!

[tomasz86]

Mimo,

There's a bug in HFSLIP related to slipstreaming of USP5 into Windows 2000 source. There's an *.exe file in the USP's "svcpack" folder which should be added to "svcpack.inf" but HFSLIP ignores it.

I've prepared a solution.

Before:

ECHO>>SVCPACK.INF [SetupHotfixesToRun]
IF EXIST HFSVCPACK\*.exe (
	IF EXIST WORK\HFSLIPCMDP1.TXT ECHO>>SVCPACK.INF HFSLIP.CMD
	FOR /F "DELIMS=" %%I IN ('DIR/B/ON HFSVCPACK\*.exe') DO ECHO>>SVCPACK.INF %%I
)

After:

ECHO>>SVCPACK.INF [SetupHotfixesToRun]
IF EXIST SOURCESS\I386\SVCPACK\*.exe IF EXIST SOURCESS\I386\SVCPACK.IN* DO (
	IF EXIST SOURCESS\I386\SVCPACK.IN_ EXPAND -R SOURCESS\I386\SVCPACK.IN_ >NUL
	FOR /F "DELIMS=" %%I IN ('DIR/B/ON SOURCESS\I386\SVCPACK\*.exe') DO FINDSTR/IL "%%I" SOURCESS\I386\SVCPACK.INF>>SVCPACK.INF
)
IF EXIST HFSVCPACK\*.exe (
	IF EXIST WORK\HFSLIPCMDP1.TXT ECHO>>SVCPACK.INF HFSLIP.CMD
	FOR /F "DELIMS=" %%I IN ('DIR/B/ON HFSVCPACK\*.exe') DO ECHO>>SVCPACK.INF %%I
)

Could you add the additional lines to the script? At the moment HFSLIP must not be used with USP5.

jvidal, on 17 June 2012 - 08:09 PM, said:

Got a question, guys. Does anyone know if the HFSLIP_PRE_TZ4 package is still needed? (.cab & .cmd)
I still have it in my hftools folder, but no idea if it does any good or is it enough with the latest tzone update...

I think they are useless if you integrate the newest time zones update.

This post has been edited by tomasz86: 18 June 2012 - 04:00 AM

[jvidal]

You sure about that, Tomas? thx for answering, BTW.
Now I don't even remeber what was it for or why we had to use it (I mean instead of just slipstreaming the latest tzone update)...

[tomasz86]

I know for sure that the time zones batch script and cab were removed from the 2K Updates List as soon as I prepared an unofficial time zones update. They were required for 2K because there was no official time zones update released. It's different in case of XP (time zones updates are still released) so I don't know what the reason for using the script was.

[jvidal]

thx. I guess i'll just get rid of 'em...

[Dogway]

-X-

In your page KB2707511 links to KB2676562.
Is that right?

[-X-]

I don't see it linking to KB2676562. Confused.

[Dogway]

WindowsXP-KB2709162-x86-ENU.exe links me to:
http://www.microsoft...7e-2141a04a321e

(sorry for typo)

[-X-]

Fixed. Thanks for pointing that out.

[Mim0]

Hi@all

I just prepared my update-list and I will upload it asap.

tomasz86, on 18 June 2012 - 03:57 AM, said:

There's a bug in HFSLIP related to slipstreaming of USP5 into Windows 2000 source. ...

I've prepared a solution.
...
Could you add the additional lines to the script? ...

Sure But could you explain these new lines? Could there problems with other updates be expected? Or are the if-conditions just true in combination of USP5 / Windows 2000?

Or could it be more safe to have something like this:

REM Example taken from line 3334 of current HFSLIP
IF "%VERSION%"=="2000" (
  IF EXIST HF\w2ksp5*.exe (
    IF %SP% LSS 5 (
      ....
    )
 )
)

around your additional lines? If you search for "USP" in the HFLIPS-script, you will find some infos that could help to confirm that Windows 2000 and USP5 will currently be used.