[Mim0]

tomasz86, on 22 June 2012 - 09:08 AM, said:

I've found the culprit.
...

IF EXIST SOURCE\I386\SVCPACK\setupusp.exe ECHO>>WORK\SVCMAIN.TXT SETUPUSP.EXE /q /n /z

...

bphlpt, on 22 June 2012 - 10:36 AM, said:

Are there other SP's in use that do have "spsetup.exe"? If so, maybe having both lines, rather than editing the line, would be a better solution? That way all the bases would be covered yet not cause you any problems with SP5.2. Or was it just a typo that is just now coming to light?
...

I have added the line from tomasz86. But I didn't removed the old line for compatibility to whatever

In the change log of HFSLIP I found this:

Quote

...
DEC 27, 2007 ~ FEB 23, 2008 -
...
Hardcoded handling of SVCPACK\spsetup.exe from USP5.
...

So I don't think that this was a typo from tommy. I didn't found anything regarding this entry of the changelog here in this forum. But after a quick search I found this:

Quote

...
2008/02/24
...
Complete changelog for HFSLIP 1.7.4
...
[USP5] when choosing merging options A, B or C, HFSLIP now correctly updates DRIVER.CAB; if USP5 was slipstreamed beforehand, make sure cdromsp5.tst is present in the root of the SOURCE folder
[USP5] handling of SVCPACK\spsetup.exe is now hardcoded; this fixes a problem when USP5 was slipstreamed beforehand (which in turn caused an error message about a missing SVCPACK.INF file to appear)
[USP5] HFSLIP now also displays the option to remove CAT files when USP5 was slipstreamed beforehand
[USP5] changed the way a source updated with USP5 is represented in HFSLIP.LOG
...

upload follows asap!

This post has been edited by Mim0: 02 July 2012 - 10:47 PM

[tomasz86]

Thanks, Mim0.

By the way, this option to remove catalog files when USP 5.1 is slipstreamed is very wrong. USP 5.1 neither disables nor breaks SFC. It's only during the installation that a hacked syssetup.dll is being used but after that it's replaced with the original one. At the end there are no hacked files in the system after the installation is finished which means that (unless you do disable SFC) there is no reason to delete the CAT files!

This post has been edited by tomasz86: 03 July 2012 - 12:13 AM

[dziubek]

Update for Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 (KB2728973)
new type of roots cert (revoke) installer rvkroots.exe

more information in this thread

This post has been edited by dziubek: 10 July 2012 - 11:26 AM

[rulman]

July,10 2012 WinXPSp3 Update List;
KB2719985 msxml3.dll (8.100.1053.0 - 2012/06/05) Msxml6.dll (6.20.2501.0 - 2012/05/06)
replace
2079403 msxml3.dll (8.100.1052.0 - 14.06.2010)
954459 Msxml6.dll (6.20.1099.0 - 10.09.2008)
973687 msxml3.dll (8.100.1051.0 - 31/07/2009) Msxml6.dll (6.20.1103.0 - 31/07/2009)

KB2721691 msxml4.dll (4.30.2114.0 - 2012/06/25) Msxml4r.dll (4.30.2100.0 - 2012/06/25)
replace
KB973685 msxml4.dll (4.30.2107.0 - 20.07.2009) Msxml4r.dll (4.30.2100.0 - 20.07.2009)

KB2718523 Win32k.sys (5.1.2600.6244 - 13/06/2012)
replace
2709162 Win32k.sys (5.1.2600.6228 - 2012/05/15)

KB2655992 schannel.dll (5.1.2600.6239 - 2012/06/04)
KB2691442 shell32.dll (6.0.2900.6242 - 2012/08/06)
KB2698365 msado15.dll (2.81.3014.0 - 2012/05/28)

And

http://download.microsoft.com/download/4/A/A/4AA524C6-239D-47FF-860B-5B397199CBF8/Windows-KB890830-V4.10.exe

This post has been edited by rulman: 12 July 2012 - 01:56 AM

[tomasz86]

Thank you rulman. There's also a new IE Cumulative Update though, and the one for MDAC installs many more files from QFE.

[Explorer09]

Note that the KB2698365 update (MS12-045) does NOT replace the KB2419632 update, because KB2419632 contains an additional "odbc32.dll" file.

And there is one Office 2003 update release this month:
KB2598361 MS12-046 (replaces KB976382 in MS10-031)

[Explorer09]

dziubek, on 10 July 2012 - 11:25 AM, said:

Update for Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 (KB2728973)
new type of roots cert (revoke) installer rvkroots.exe

I've converted that update into an .reg files that can be used in HFSLIP:
http://www.msfn.org/...ost__p__1003594

[-X-]

New Flash 11.3.300.265
http://fpdownload.ma...11_active_x.exe

[rulman]

KB2481109 09.03.2011
mstsc.exe (6.0.6001.18589 - 27.01.2011)
mstscax.dll (6.0.6001.18589 - 02.02.2011)
This ('KB2481109') HF folder, we add the update;
mstsc.exe (6.0.6001.22840 )

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2481109

[jvidal]

2481109 is a very old update, why are you mentioning it now?

[jvidal]

In case you guys are interested, I made an updated swflash.cab package, no updater.
get it here: https://dl.dropbox.c...652/SWFLASH.CAB

c ya!

This post has been edited by jvidal: 17 July 2012 - 08:50 PM

[Mim0]

Hi guys,
I'm back from holiday and will update the file-checker asap!
Mimo

[rulman]

KB2719985 not integrated HF
but SW1 integrate

[jvidal]

@rulman:it works, already tried it.
Made my updated CD, installed on a VM and MU only wanted the genuine notification crap, which I leave out intentionally.

try again!

bye!
PS: i'm talking with 2719985 in the HF folder.

This post has been edited by jvidal: 17 July 2012 - 10:38 AM

[Explorer09]

2719985 replaces these two updates: 973687, 2079403.
So if rulman integrated 973687 or 2079403 after 2719985, the update would be undone.

[-X-]

Hey Mim0, how did you manage to find a current WindowsXP-KB892130-ENU-x86.exe (Windows Genuine Advantage Validation)?

[tomasz86]

@Mim0

This reg file can be used instead of KB2603381 (HFSVCPACK_SW1):

 Windows2000-XP-2003-KB2603381-x86-XXX.reg (247bytes)
Number of downloads: 5

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunOnce]
"KB2603381"="cmd.exe /c \"reg.exe ADD HKCR\\Package\\protocol\\StdFileEditing\\server /ve /d %systemroot%\\system32\\packager.exe /f\""

[jvidal]

Explorer09, on 21 July 2012 - 07:52 PM, said:

2719985 replaces these two updates: 973687, 2079403.
So if rulman integrated 973687 or 2079403 after 2719985, the update would be undone.

that's probably what happened. I can ASSURE you that putting 2719985 in HF folder works just fine.

[jvidal]

tomasz86, on 22 July 2012 - 01:28 AM, said:

@Mim0

This reg file can be used instead of KB2603381 (HFSVCPACK_SW1):

Windows2000-XP-2003-KB2603381-x86-XXX.reg

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunOnce]
"KB2603381"="cmd.exe /c \"reg.exe ADD HKCR\\Package\\protocol\\StdFileEditing\\server /ve /d %systemroot%\\system32\\packager.exe /f\""

Why are you calling reg.exe from inside a reg file??? why not just add the registry value directly?

[tomasz86]

@jvidal

Because it's necessary to get the real value for %systemroot%. If you put %systemroot% in the reg file it will add it as "%systemroot%" while here it's required to be added as the real path.

You can check the difference yourself between the one above (correct) and this one (incorrect):

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunOnce]
"KB2603381"="reg.exe ADD HKCR\\Package\\protocol\\StdFileEditing\\server /ve /d %systemroot%\\system32\\packager.exe /f"

This post has been edited by tomasz86: 22 July 2012 - 01:59 PM